Last time I played, I called out 2/3 scumbags at the end of day 2. Let's see if I lost my sharpness or not.
[N][M] Normal Ass Normal Game
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Djagulingu
Germany3605 Posts
Last time I played, I called out 2/3 scumbags at the end of day 2. Let's see if I lost my sharpness or not. | ||
Djagulingu
Germany3605 Posts
| ||
Djagulingu
Germany3605 Posts
| ||
Djagulingu
Germany3605 Posts
| ||
Djagulingu
Germany3605 Posts
On April 15 2014 17:50 OmniEulogy wrote: I'm eating my breakfast man, can't start scum hunting before a good nutritious and balanced meal entirely composed of poptarts and eggo waffles. That being said of course I'm interested if you also have the spirit of the great maximus black and nova war instilled in you. He's claiming that he has the spirit of the great maximus black and novawar instilled in himself. I don't think so. This is fucking Mafia by the way. It's not about stopping cheesers or some weird shit. It's Hunter the Reckoning style. | ||
Djagulingu
Germany3605 Posts
WTF is a robik? On April 15 2014 18:03 Koshi wrote: Are you scumslipping I am town or am I not reading this propperly? It definitely is a scumslip. On April 15 2014 18:49 Koshi wrote: How do you discribe your scum play and your town play? Good point. Can everyone tell his town play and scum play? I can define my town play but I can't define my scum play (because I have never played scum in any mafia game. In fact, this is my second mafia game and I was a townie in the first). My town play is really stalk heavy. I watch all of you. All of you, when you post, when you sleep, when you work, when you eat. I might come out of nowhere with random people to lynch for random reasons. They did come out true though. I would define my town play as systematic instead of impulsive, I don't care about collateral damage, sharp and decisive over overly cautious. I think the game was Normal Mini Mafia XIII (The game had marvellosity, Chezinu and talismania as scum; Palmar, VisceraEyes, me, Shady Sands and some other people I don't remember as town. I called Chezinu and talismania right at the end of day 2, I could call out marvellosity but I tunnel visioned and lost my sharpness day 4.). If you dare to investigate any further, you will find that I'm telling you the truth. If your scum play is passive and town play is spammy, then I can pretty much say that you're a scumbag who is trying to masquerade amongst the town folk. This will not get you out of your gehenna though. Come on, vampires who break masquerade are eliminated even by other vampires. The only reason you're living right now is because there was no lynch-night kill. | ||
Djagulingu
Germany3605 Posts
On April 15 2014 20:15 Skanjab1s wrote: No, I don't, he's a townie through and through. Do you think he's scum? And I see no reason to think YOU are a townie. | ||
Djagulingu
Germany3605 Posts
| ||
Djagulingu
Germany3605 Posts
On April 15 2014 20:25 Koshi wrote: I am awaiting his response first. It was as scumslip as "100%" | ||
Djagulingu
Germany3605 Posts
On April 15 2014 20:29 Koshi wrote: I don't see what you are seeing tbh. I can guess somewhere what you are thinking but it kinda thin. We will see. You have no idea what I'm thinking lol. | ||
Djagulingu
Germany3605 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + LIMB BY LIMB | ||
Djagulingu
Germany3605 Posts
On April 15 2014 20:45 OmniEulogy wrote: weak pressure on Skan on an association based on his first post and riding Koshi's tail seems to be what you're doing though what that means you are thinking though no clue... *omg and easy way to seem like I'm doing something productive for town!* perhaps? I actually AM doing something productive for town. Luring people into a sophisticated discussion, trying to make the game a high-post game instead of a low-post one that would be good for scumbags. You can't say it didn't work, can you? Especially considering the fact that you jumped right in. | ||
Djagulingu
Germany3605 Posts
On April 15 2014 21:06 OmniEulogy wrote: what? didn't you just join on Koshi's discussion? And then I really want to make people realize you tried to make an association case on Skan for his second post... yeah... you're totally up for sophisticated discussion as long as it involves shutting down everybody with an opinion that doesn't match yours by labeling them scum immediately =/ I'm not against the method I'm against how you do it. "I label people whose opinions don't match me as scum, right on" so you say. And you're not against the method and you're against how I do it. First of all, what do you think the method is? If you answer the question correct, then I'll ask you a second question. Scum slips are sometimes so simple as a "100%". Shit like this happened in one of the games, guy turned out as scum. Guy took 4 townies all by himself before they actually realized. | ||
Djagulingu
Germany3605 Posts
On April 15 2014 21:29 kushm4sta wrote: Koshi, true or false? Skans claim almost never is coming from scum. Claiming that someone is townie through and through and showing no reason about that claim and dodging every single question about his reasoning almost never is coming from scum? He might or might not be a townie, but his behaviors just don't help town at all. | ||
Djagulingu
Germany3605 Posts
On April 15 2014 21:06 OmniEulogy wrote: what? didn't you just join on Koshi's discussion? And then I really want to make people realize you tried to make an association case on Skan for his second post... yeah... you're totally up for sophisticated discussion as long as it involves shutting down everybody with an opinion that doesn't match yours by labeling them scum immediately =/ I'm not against the method I'm against how you do it. EBWOP: If Koshi tries to do shit that benefits town, of course I will join on Koshi's discussion. If it was you instead of Koshi, I would join on your discussion instead of Koshi's. | ||
Djagulingu
Germany3605 Posts
On April 15 2014 21:42 OneThousandWords wrote: Djagulingu, you describe your town play as: In this game you have already called 2 people scum for supposed scum slips. Am I to assume that you have now 180° on your own meta so quickly? This doesn't look very systematic to me, it looks like the complete opposite. You jump on people and call them scum without much basis and state that you are helping the town by making a pro-town atmosphere of sophisticated discussion when, instead, you are steering people in a very specific direction on a point of view that seems entirely skewed on pushing an agenda. You would understand if you have read Hunter Book: Wayward. But I like your sharpness. You're like Peleus in that book. This is how God45 defines Peleus: And so I found him. The prodigal problem child. Alleyman. Peleus. The sniper was a little resitant to my ideas. That's understandable. I was actually pleased that he didn't take to them so quickly. Enlightenment shouldn't come immediately. It took me a long time to discover the truth. We can't all be Paul on the road to Damascus. He had the methods down. He's messy and he leaves too much of himself behind, but he's efficient. His numbers are great. And I appreciate his attitude toward others of our kind. He won't tolerate their whiny, backstabbing bullshit. Their opinions are threefold- they can help, they can get out of the way or they try to find their way out of a body bag. He doesn't know the words for it yet, but somewhere in there he knows that if you're not curing the cancer, you are the cancer. There's no in between. | ||
Djagulingu
Germany3605 Posts
On April 15 2014 22:24 Koshi wrote: Or super duper townreads? I read town on OneThousandWords | ||
Djagulingu
Germany3605 Posts
On April 15 2014 23:59 OmniEulogy wrote: I think Djag's thinking on that is pretty similar to my own. OTW has made decent points based on what people have said so far + Show Spoiler + On April 15 2014 21:42 OneThousandWords wrote: Djagulingu, you describe your town play as: In this game you have already called 2 people scum for supposed scum slips. Am I to assume that you have now 180° on your own meta so quickly? This doesn't look very systematic to me, it looks like the complete opposite. You jump on people and call them scum without much basis and state that you are helping the town by making a pro-town atmosphere of sophisticated discussion when, instead, you are steering people in a very specific direction on a point of view that seems entirely skewed on pushing an agenda. + Show Spoiler + On April 15 2014 22:19 OneThousandWords wrote: No, it's about the fact that I think he is town for when he claimed and how he did it and all situations point to it being beneficial for town but then you determine that there is likely a mafia motive behind the play and talk about mafia gambling plays, which I think at this point is crazy. I find it hard to call him scummy with posts like this although it's too early for me to call him town either for lack of anything substantial. Djag did say something that irked me a bit as I try to avoid this very thing in every game I've played but "I can define my town play but I can't define my scum play (because I have never played scum in any mafia game. In fact, this is my second mafia game and I was a townie in the first)." I can see him sticking OTW as town immediately for the above two reasons even though OTW is pressuring Djag as he does it. 1- Did you play any mafia game as a scum? 2- If your answer to the 1st question is no, can you tell me how you define your scum meta? | ||
Djagulingu
Germany3605 Posts
Talking about my own self-meta: I'm still as systematic, calm and careful as I described. I just didn't describe my "system". | ||
Djagulingu
Germany3605 Posts
On April 16 2014 01:38 Koshi wrote: You must have missed his pretty hard "I played 1 game and caught all scum" post then. The irky feeling was the soft newbie claim? It was actually 2/3. Both were pretty obvious :D lurking, bandwagoning, not helping town at all. Obvious scum tells, consistent for all 4 game days. | ||
| ||