Tasteless Statement
[Valor] Tasteless Statement
Forum Index > BW General |
Artosis
United States2135 Posts
Tasteless Statement | ||
Showtime!
Canada2938 Posts
EDIT: Exactly as I expected: Lipton collects the reps and distributes them. You should have replayed the fucking game. This happens in WGTCL all the time. | ||
tree.hugger
Philadelphia, PA10406 Posts
Except the decision to film it outside on the busy street. Would it have been really sketchy to film it in a quieter room? I think this should be the new controversy. | ||
RushWifDietCoke
United States488 Posts
| ||
houseurmusic
United States544 Posts
| ||
InToTheWannaB
United States4770 Posts
| ||
gokai
United States812 Posts
On July 01 2009 13:03 tree.hugger wrote: It all makes sense. Except the decision to film it outside on the busy street. Would it have been really sketchy to film it in a quieter room? I think this should be the new controversy. What are you talking about. I had no problems hearing what Tasteless said. | ||
usopsama
6502 Posts
| ||
StarBrift
Sweden1761 Posts
| ||
Sadistx
Zimbabwe5568 Posts
| ||
iNcontroL
USA29055 Posts
| ||
LG)Sabbath
Argentina3022 Posts
Tasteless is clearly doing his best for things to go smoothly and although I think he kind of missed the point that Strelok was trying to make, there is just no point in discussing it any further as we know that he would have made a good decision in the first place if he had been there. | ||
illu
Canada2531 Posts
| ||
Yaqoob
Canada3293 Posts
On July 01 2009 14:40 illu wrote: Can anyone explain the drama in words? Its explained in words in the video. Watch the video. | ||
JWD
United States12607 Posts
The gist of this video is that Tasteless denies that Lipton or Daniel Lee ever gave Strelok a "final decision". His implication is that Strelok either totally misinterpreted Lipton and Daniel Lee, or that Strelok understood their decision was not final and was simply lying in his OP here. I'm not sure how to reconcile this with the fact that both Strelok (biased) and Artosis (unbiased) wrote that Lipton / "admins" had issued a "decision" on the disconnect. | ||
Husky
United States3362 Posts
| ||
Etherone
United States1898 Posts
If they agree that SDM and Lipton do not have the know how or authority to make a tournament decision such as this they should have simply asked both players to bear with them and wait till Tasteless was available to make a verdict. this was not the case afaik. I also agree that the standard would be to replay the game of the disconnect as opposed to the entire match, but once SDM stated the entire set would be replayed, independently of whether or not he said "final decision", it is exactly that, unless clearly stated otherwise. I thank tasteless for giving us his side of it, and i understand he is in a difficult position of deciding whether to retract what the others decided (wrongly), or to do what should have been done in the first place, but in the process retracting their authority. | ||
ZeitgeistMovie
144 Posts
| ||
Idle
Korea (South)124 Posts
| ||
Kyuki
Sweden1867 Posts
On July 01 2009 15:06 JWD wrote: First off, props to Tasteless for giving us his side of this story. The gist of this video is that Tasteless denies that Lipton or Daniel Lee ever gave Strelok a "final decision". His implication is that Strelok either totally misinterpreted Lipton and Daniel Lee, or that Strelok understood their decision was not final and was simply lying in his OP here. I'm not sure how to reconcile this with the fact that both Strelok (biased) and Artosis (unbiased) wrote that Lipton / "admins" had issued a "decision" on the disconnect. Tasteless stressed "Final" quite a few times, obviously there were initial decisions that had to be done (i.e Lipton making a decision on the spot with X help) and after further discussion it would lead to a Final Decision. It's been a communication problem from the start, and I cant see how one shouldnt take this as a learning experience, and just brush it off and play the fucking game from now on. | ||
| ||