squelch! option?
Forum Index > Website Feedback |
STIMEY d okgm fish
Canada6140 Posts
| ||
TeCh)PsylO
United States3552 Posts
| ||
Meat
Netherlands3751 Posts
| ||
STIMEY d okgm fish
Canada6140 Posts
| ||
z7-TranCe
Canada3158 Posts
| ||
Saro
United States852 Posts
I can see why some people might want that feature, but really, if someone's posts are unanimously considered bad, they usually get banned. Anyway, what do you think Meat? Gogo? | ||
Mydnyte
3306 Posts
Squelch option would be weak, imo. But then again, I'm not in charge ! | ||
Taguchi
Greece1575 Posts
do it! | ||
Rekrul
Korea (South)17174 Posts
Don't do it. | ||
SillyCat
United States960 Posts
| ||
Countdown
1217 Posts
| ||
Twisted
Netherlands13552 Posts
| ||
STIMEY d okgm fish
Canada6140 Posts
furthermore, this feature would let admins see just how many people feel this way about each user, if they wanted to see. it would give the admins more support in considering any decision. | ||
Liquid`Spy
Netherlands1301 Posts
| ||
Louder
United States2276 Posts
| ||
Dang-it
United States557 Posts
| ||
STIMEY d okgm fish
Canada6140 Posts
On May 03 2004 16:19 Dang-it wrote: dont do it its gay cause if someone said something and people are bming him you''ll end up asking what the fuck is going on thats gay its not gay cause it could say --squelched-- and there could be a link that says what he say???? that u click on so no one has to post asking what the fuck is going on | ||
Rekrul
Korea (South)17174 Posts
On May 03 2004 19:26 STIMEY d okgm fish wrote: thats gay its not gay cause it could say --squelched-- and there could be a link that says what he say???? that u click on so no one has to post asking what the fuck is going on just accept it. you're childish if you need this option. it wasn't a bad idea, but it wasn't a good one either. ! move on ! | ||
FakeSteve[TPR]
Valhalla18444 Posts
Well then I suppose that's your problem. Squelch seems stupid | ||
Meat
Netherlands3751 Posts
Now i could consider something like a button "I would like this user banned" that forum regulars have and if someone has 10+ votes or whatever that we take a special look at that user. However i have doubts about this too, i think it's only to weed out the new users that come here to fuck around and admins dont see immidiatly. | ||
FakeSteve[TPR]
Valhalla18444 Posts
| ||
SweeTLemonS[TPR]
11739 Posts
On May 03 2004 03:48 [pG]Rekrul wrote: Bad idea. Don't do it. Hahaha, I love your reasoning. Every time someone has an idea it's just, "Bad idea. Don't do it." Awesome. I don't like the idea, either, but I can see why some people might want it. | ||
STIMEY d okgm fish
Canada6140 Posts
every once in a while you see people on irc who pretend they can mentally block out everything they dont care to see, they refuse to use /ignore. they are in the minority, of course :| they like to look down on people who use /ignore, too. i guess that's one of the perks of having super powers is that you get to blame everyone else for not having them; you can call them childish, for instance. and u think it doesnt apply to msg boards? i dont know about you but ive read a post before and not realized who wrote it until getting a ways into it and then going "wtf, this is shit", i look at who posted it, and sure enough, i shoulda checked the name. it's a mistake i make, now and then, and it would be nice if there was a feature to help me decrease this. sometimes i just know i'm better off if i never see some people's posts ever again, it's for the best, and the best way to let me do this is with some forum option. sure, "in theory", with rekrul/fakesteve-like super powers, i can magically not respond to anything written by certain people, but now and then, it just doesn't work out that way. calling me childish might give u the moral high ground but it doesnt help me any less to be tempted to respond to the consistently horrible posts by certain people | ||
Countdown
1217 Posts
| ||
STIMEY d okgm fish
Canada6140 Posts
| ||
mensrea
Canada5062 Posts
| ||
Mydnyte
3306 Posts
You don't wanna read a persons post, just ignore it. | ||
Rekrul
Korea (South)17174 Posts
On May 08 2004 01:52 mensrea wrote: I like the idea... think harder | ||
Countdown
1217 Posts
On May 07 2004 22:14 STIMEY d okgm fish wrote: really, why wouldnt you? same with amat, right? thats 2 right there. if i never read any of their posts i think i would be better off in every way. i dont care if they're banned but i'd like 2 squelch them i was kidding. i wouldn't squelch blackjack or amat, but i would squelch you | ||
STIMEY d okgm fish
Canada6140 Posts
| ||
Mydnyte
3306 Posts
| ||
| ||