|
I think it is time to teach some of you the meaning of "hot". The meaning of "hot" should die out by say, 20. If your smart. Just like you should stop bar hopping by 25. But that is another blog for another time. it is time to learn the difference between "hot" and "beautiful" and I hope by the time of this little lecture, or rant, you will be able to notice the difference between the two in the real world Let class begin:
Our first "hot" subject:
Now settle down, I know some of you are thinking, "damn I'd like to tap that!" and so forth.
Here's is what I see, a shallow dumb bitch that won't be able to get up every morning without a 100k + car to drive her to the mall to be willingly part of a voyeur that will be on PornTube by the end of the month.
Beautiful subject:
Notice anything? If not, let me explain. Notice the lack of what I like to call sharp as a knife, but slow as a brick syndrome. She has class. If Athena were real, this is what she would look like. No STD in there I bet.
Is another glimpse of what a woman looks like:
Pardon my French, but, Damn.
Next "Hot" subject:
Hmmm, what is wrong with this picture you ask. It has probably been recycled a dozen times. The lips look to plastic, and she probably wants to be a Nurse while also manging a Baskin Robins. That and she seems like a bitch. Moving on.
Beautiful subject:
Meet Julie Benz, gentlemen. She also has class, and knows it. A little spunk never hurt anybody. Notice the plain look that she has but somehow manges to make it beautiful. This is beauty in it's truest form.
One more pic of her:
Now I hope the next time someone makes a hot girl thread they take things like this into consideration. Instead of posting some chick who you think would probably try to smell a scratch and sniff sticker at the bottom of a pool, go with class. And make it count. Those 10k babies you just wasted won't come back.
If the pictures don't work, just Google them.
|
shit my little sister was next to me -.-
|
|
|
On March 26 2008 03:55 MeriaDoKk wrote: shit my little sister was next to me -.-
Lol
|
+ Show Spoiler +On March 26 2008 03:40 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:I think it is time to teach some of you the meaning of " hot". The meaning of " hot" should die out by say, 20. If your smart. Just like you should stop bar hopping by 25. But that is another blog for another time. it is time to learn the difference between " hot" and " beautiful" and I hope by the time of this little lecture, or rant, you will be able to notice the difference between the two in the real world Let class begin: Our first " hot" subject: Now settle down, I know some of you are thinking, "damn I'd like to tap that!" and so forth. Here's is what I see, a shallow dumb bitch that won't be able to get up every morning without a 100k + car to drive her to the mall to be willingly part of a voyeur that will be on PornTube by the end of the month. Beautiful subject: Notice anything? If not, let me explain. Notice the lack of what I like to call sharp as a knife, but slow as a brick syndrome. She has class. If Athena were real, this is what she would look like. No STD in there I bet. Is another glimpse of what a woman looks like: Pardon my French, but, Damn. Next " Hot" subject: Hmmm, what is wrong with this picture you ask. It has probably been recycled a dozen times. The lips look to plastic, and she probably wants to be a Nurse while also manging a Baskin Robins. That and she seems like a bitch. Moving on. Beautiful subject: Meet Julie Benz, gentlemen. She also has class, and knows it. A little spunk never hurt anybody. Notice the plain look that she has but somehow manges to make it beautiful. This is beauty in it's truest form. One more pic of her: Now I hope the next time someone makes a hot girl thread they take things like this into consideration. Instead of posting some chick who you think would probably try to smell a scratch and sniff sticker at the bottom of a pool, go with class. And make it count. Those 10k babies you just wasted won't come back. If the pictures don't work, just Google them.
It's time to learn the difference between "you're" and "your".
Your shit is immature and subjective. You don't know shit about any of the people in the pictures. I doubt you've met Jenna Fisher so I don't think you can say shit about her "class" etc.
|
Zurich15241 Posts
Congratulation, you compared two 18yr old plastic porn teens to three ~30yr old women. What are you even trying to say? That you find 30yr old women more attractive than 20yr old girls? Well, other people might have a totally different taste here. Who are you to "teach" us?
The meaning of "hot" should die out by say, 20. Really? Well, maybe most people who find the hot girls hot, are, in fact, younger than 20.
Oh, and also thanks for the bar hopping advice, I'll keep that in mind as I too want to be counted among the smart people like you.
All that aside, I totally concur that the three beautiful women you posted are a lot hotter that the two plastic chicks.
|
I totally agree with zatic here. You're placing wayy too much emphasis on the way the photo was taken (photoshopped, how "bare" she looks) and using that information to judge the model's intelligence (hint: they aren't related).
I like Jenna Fischer too (I assume you already watch The Office), but your argument is ridiculous. You probably also believe that people have "leagues" in terms of boy/girls that they can potentially date.
Bottom line is none of us are going to date these women so why do you care how smart they are? Does it make you feel better when you masturbate about them that they can hold their own in a conversation?
|
this is how i rank it:
Fit - nice body, you know...nothing wrong (generic blonde big tits that are plastered everywhere)
Hot - again nice body, but with a kind of unique look...someone like Rose Byrne or so
Beautiful - basically hot, but this incorporates personality into it as well, so you can't really bust this out to jpgs on the internets
|
On March 26 2008 03:55 MeriaDoKk wrote: shit my little sister was next to me -.- XD
|
On March 26 2008 03:55 MeriaDoKk wrote: shit my little sister was next to me -.- pix plz -_-
What? Someone had to say it.
|
Not everyone who looks at members of the opposite sex is looking for someone to settle down with, or go steady with.
|
WTF, is that Pam from The Office? O_o
|
|
United States22883 Posts
Wait, so a beautiful girl in a bikini at the beach has less class than the girl posing naked in her kitchen?
Pam is great, but this thread is retarded.
|
|
i dont like jeena's jameson face tho, i couldnt find a better "quick hottie".
|
idk, normally when someone says something like "wow she's hot" and post a pic of their (favorite?) girl, usually I have no interest at all. I honestly don't understand people's taste. I guess its just me.
|
United States22883 Posts
Hot to me is just a body description. Face plays no real role when I use that term. And it doesn't mean cute bodies (like when people start posting pics of normal looking asian girls), it means full figure 9-10s.
|
they're all hot in my eyes o.o
|
well, I find the face most important, and the personality/mind. the body is less important to me.
|
Now I realize everyone is different, but my perception of "hot" has changed a lot in recent years. It's even more sexist than it used to be, but also more objective.
I find girls to be hot when they're submissive, have child bearing hips, can cook, don't argue with me (submissive I guess) unless they catch some random mistake I make then I can give them one of those "oh boy, you just wait until you err!" smiles, major in something like Spanish, art, education, or psychology (fake science) instead of something like engineering, economics, math, or chemistry (two of which are mine) and the like. But this is the kind of person I'd want to marry, I'm not so interested in random flings anymore.
But I do agree that the human female is pretty great in the great cases. On that note though, I think the girls you labeled "beautiful" are attractive and the ones you labeled "hot" are not at all.
Edit: If you don't want to read all that, the most important thing to remember is: No fat chicks
|
iNcontroL
USA29055 Posts
Not sure if its fair to judge the type of woman they are based on a picture. One of the flat out hottest girls I have ever been with was also the most pure of heart/soul. I think generalizing like that is dangerous and unfair.
But the distinction between hot and beautiful is nice I like that discussion. I've had it several times myself with friends that I feel misuse the term(s).
|
you're comparing pictures, not people. most people in this world can look hot, beautiful, cute, ugly, disgusting - all depends on the picture (and PHOTOSHOP)
|
I agree with your general idea here, OP. However, I don't really agree with your examples. Your first example of "beautiful" (naked woman hidden by a sheet) is great. But your other examples of beautiful strike me as very fake, therefore placing them in the "hot" and "less classy" category. The Benz, girl, for example, is heavily made up. I don't see the "plain" look you describe. I see tons of make up. In another example of "beautiful" I see a woman wearing a kinky, silly, stupid outfit that is more suited to porn than anything (not that this is bad, necessarily, but definitely not what I consider to be a look of pure, simple beauty.)
To be as clear as I can be without photo's, my idea of beautiful (in the sense that you use the word) requires the following:
- Healthy. Takes care of herself with a good diet and exercise. Not overweight or underweight. - No makeup. At all! - Simple clothes (or no clothes!) I hate high fashion. In general fancy clothes make people seem fake to me. - Not girlish, stupid, or submissive (as in most porn, jap-anime, etc.) Women ought to come off as aware, active in their lives, and confident (not arrogant, haughty, etc.)
In general, an all natural and healthy look will tend towards beautiful. Many people would be beautiful if they could meet these two standards. Unfortunately, here in the states, over half our population is overweight, and no one is natural.
|
u gotta skate8152 Posts
Zooey Deschanel defines beautiful! (IMO :p)
|
so you like milfs good for you
|
beauty is subjective
your judgements on the models in these photos are presumptuous, and i find it to be quite funny
|
she defines beautiful............ i love her
|
United States22883 Posts
It's pretty misleading to call anyone hot or beautiful from a professional photograph. What you see is not what you get.
|
I read the O.P., and agree to some extent, but I still take issue with it.
I just don't see the problem in enjoying the look of a 'hot' chick from time to time. Just because she isn't the sharpest tool in the shed personality wise doesn't detract from the fact that she is pleasing to look at. Idk, just my thoughts.
|
should be hot vs beauty vs slutty to be even more accurate
|
Somehow something feels very wrong about judging each of these women's personality and lifestyle by a picture of them. Someone can look dumb as rocks but that doesn't necessarily mean that's an accurate gauge of their actual intelligence. I'd imagine most women would find it highly insulting that you are judging based entirely on appearance, not even in person at that.
Practically all the women in all of the OP's pictures most likely didn't have anything to do with choosing their pose, clothing, amounts of makeup, setting, or how the photo was finished in terms of photoshop editing. Any of the women listed as beautiful could probably just as easily be made to look like complete trashy sluts given the right conditions in an image. The same being true of the women deemed hot, I'm fairly confident that you could take any of them and make them look far more sophisticated and "beautiful" given the right photographer.
Unless you know any of these people, have heard them speak candidly about a variety of subjects, or at least read up a bit on these individuals I don't feel it's fair at all to judge them as people. You can judge the image all you want, perhaps you can draw some conclusions about the photographer, but a bit of a far stretch to make the kind of assumptions the OP is making.
Edit: An example of what I was talking about. The OP used Julie Benz as an example of a women with "class" but I'm of the mindset that this is more a product of the image he chose to post. This is the second result from google image search:
http://www.wallpaperbase.com/wallpapers/celebs/juliebenz/julie_benz_3.jpg
In my opinion, she doesn't look any classier in the above photo than the first picture the OP posted. Perhaps a little better since I would guess the photographer was of a bit higher quality.
|
OP is so wrong, in so many ways, it hurts. You're basically saying that a girl who is trying to look sexy must have a worse personality than a girl who is not trying to look sexy, and so she is in fact worse looking. First of all I don't see how you can infer personality from looks (especially the way a porn star looks in a photoshopped picture), and secondly I don't see how you can use the personality of a girl to judge her physical beauty.
It seems like all you're really saying is that you prefer "cute" girls to "sexy" girls. No problem with that, but you're not gonna convince me that sexy girls aren't sexy.
|
Is this the Hot Girls thread that EvilTeletubby was referencing?
|
Yeah this thread is retarded. Plus, all you did was post blonde girls. AS if the words weren't biased enough.
|
Haha for once I agree with you, Stork.
|
On August 30 2011 06:51 StorkHwaiting wrote: Yeah this thread is retarded. Plus, all you did was post blonde girls. AS if the words weren't biased enough. You mean his arbitrary standards of beauty don't give with yours??
heavens no!!!!
|
Well the part that gets me is that he asserts one is more wholesome than the other when they're both standing nude/halfnaked in front of a camera for the internet for the express purpose of fueling strangers' masturbation. There's nothing really classy about that. Then again, it was 3 years ago ^^ I suppose the difference is whether you're talking about what you think the actual girl is like (stupid) or if you're just basking in the illusion created by the picture (ignoring the fact that there's a camera there and a purpose to the shoot).
|
Ha ha ha
Geoff said it best. Anyway, I don't care for either. I care for oh natural girls who don't even have to try.
|
StealthBlue has bad taste in girls, sorry to say.
|
When do we get some hot girls in this thread
|
Holy necro batman! But this is pretty fun to read :3
|
Zurich15241 Posts
Reported. Maybe a banling like StealthBlue will close this.
|
Yummie aesthetics there.
|
mod edit: tasteless picture
User was temp banned for this post.
User was warned for this post
|
This thread is such a trap for stealthblue to explode his banling hammer all over us. And I don't think beautiful and hot are mutually exclusive. Hot imo refers more to how sexually attractive a woman is while beautiful refers more to 'a sigh to behold' , a rarity. You can see hot women all the time but it's not all the time you get to see a woman's beautiful side.
|
1/5 cos the first picture reminded me of my ex from 4 months ago. Shame on you for posting a picture that looks like someone I dated 2 years after you posted that picture. Shame. On. You.
|
Zurich15241 Posts
Three years later and I am still doing bar hopping. Am I hoplessly retarded SB? How can I join the ranks of you smart people?
|
I always classified the two terms as the following:
Hot: Someone you want to bang/have a one night stand Beautiful: Someone you want to actually get to know/marry.
Even though those two words are supposed to be associated with one's physical appearance, it's slowly become a word to describe their personality, at least for me.
|
On August 30 2011 07:00 Chef wrote: Haha for once I agree with you, Stork.
I've been looking forward to this moment for oh so long!!
|
|
|
|