|
|
|
|
you goddamn protoss t______________t
|
On June 18 2009 07:46 FragKrag wrote: you goddamn protoss t______________t I wholeheartedly agree.
Good job on D+ anyway
|
|
Well, for iccup tosses you might as well subtract a rank. So C toss = D player. Pretty sure you can get to C- in a day just with DTs and cannon rushes and 2 gate lots.
|
On June 18 2009 08:44 Sadistx wrote: Well, for iccup tosses you might as well subtract a rank. So C toss = D player. Pretty sure you can get to C- in a day just with DTs and cannon rushes and 2 gate lots.
You are just bitter because you are bad verse toss.
|
On June 18 2009 08:44 Sadistx wrote: Well, for iccup tosses you might as well subtract a rank. So C toss = D player. Pretty sure you can get to C- in a day just with DTs and cannon rushes and 2 gate lots.
this. but B- and up and low level protoss cheese is so ineffective :p
|
D+ actually is not even a real effort for any player who knows at least 3 proper bos, so dont run arround trying to get attention for something that worthless pls.. t.t
|
Im protoss and i've never cheesed a game in my life on my main account. I got to B- with just playing straight up. Also cheesing to rank up means you miss all those games that could've been practice and you end up getting owned later on.
|
an emotional rollarcoaster. Happens to me too
|
On June 18 2009 07:20 kOre wrote:So I made a blog about how I cheesed to try and get to D+ to play Lz (blog is here) but like it says I only got to play 7 games. Few days later I decided to play normal? Like regular games without cheese and I found myself getting really bored from playing games but I finally made it to D+, I can never get past D+ or stay D+ for long so I'm going to mass cheese D+ games to see if it works to C-! Oh yeah and just looking at my match history I lose to every damn Korean I play ... wtf? Ewwww 6 wins and 6 losses when I don't cheese ... + Show Spoiler [Game 1] +I Cannon rushed him as usual and then he blocked it So I proceeded with a natural Cannon contain and then Zealot rape! + Show Spoiler [Game 2] +Regular PvP until I took out his natural twice (he didn't gg I don't know why) so I made mass Cannons outside of his natural because I got bored after taking out his natural twice already. P.S. Point of this as because I made it to D+ and IM HAPPPPPPYYYY!!! ^^ EDIT: Okay I checked the profiles of my opponents and they all suck so now it doesn't even feel like I made D+ properly ... IM SAAAAAAAAAAD!!! fuck ... iCCup Profile
You have to realize that they are suppose to suck, they are at the D level. If they were better they wouldn't be there
|
l10f
United States3241 Posts
|
|
On June 18 2009 09:27 MeriaDoKk wrote: just 1a2a3a to C- As sad as it is, it doesn't work =(.
|
On June 18 2009 09:35 Archaic wrote:As sad as it is, it doesn't work =(. you're not trying hard enough
You have to select your units and hotkey them before you 1a2a3a
|
don't get it, you faggot tosses dont need cheese lol it's that easy
edit: yes i hate protoss
|
konadora
Singapore66060 Posts
|
On June 18 2009 10:04 clazziquai wrote: don't get it, you faggot tosses dont need cheese lol it's that easy
edit: yes i hate protoss wats ur race?
|
|
United States10328 Posts
On June 18 2009 07:46 FragKrag wrote: you goddamn protoss t______________t
hmm why are cannons so weak
|
On June 18 2009 09:27 MeriaDoKk wrote: just 1a2a3a to C-
Someone wants to start a race war.. ~_~
|
lol, I support this blog because its making elitist 'better than thou' people upset. Keep it up and grats on d+!
|
On June 18 2009 07:56 barth wrote:I wholeheartedly agree. Good job on D+ anyway
|
I remember when i made it to D+ for the first time last season. The points on that account was 2002 and I got scared that if i kept playing on that account for practice i would lose D+ status. So i played on my other account and left the D+ account be
|
I never said I cheesed because I couldn't play a normal game, I just get bored really easily.
|
i lost the stupidest fucking game today (OF COURSE AGAINST PROTOSS)
he went 1 gate no range into reaver. I FD all the way into his main leaving nothing but the reaver.. by the time he reaches my base I have pretty much a full turret ring as well as my nat completely up. He kills about 2 supply depots and 3 SCVs with his reaver, before I eventually kill his shuttle containing 2 reavers. I then add 4 facts to finish the job when he has teched to DTs. I actually had scan at this point, but I just had scanned his base to see carrier tech also incoming. He is also trying to expand to the min only and the island (map is PYTH, cross positions). I fuck up bad with my scans and end up getting delayed a ton, but I end up taking out both is nat and his 4th base, while taking my 3rd. I begin to pump goliaths like mad when i realize he has also taken 3 oclock, and since I suck balls against carriers he starts raping my push with a now alarming amount of carriers. eventually He just builds massive amounts of cannons until he has like 15 carriers and runs me over. OMFG IT WAS SO STUPID HE WAS SO BAD ITS NOT FAIRRRR
sry for the rage post LOL
|
Some pretty ridiculous cheeses going on there lol
|
United States11390 Posts
On June 18 2009 10:10 konadora wrote: Ban protoss thx This is why you have a star.
|
On June 18 2009 11:35 dekuschrub wrote: i lost the stupidest fucking game today (OF COURSE AGAINST PROTOSS)
he went 1 gate no range into reaver. I FD all the way into his main leaving nothing but the reaver.. by the time he reaches my base I have pretty much a full turret ring as well as my nat completely up. He kills about 2 supply depots and 3 SCVs with his reaver, before I eventually kill his shuttle containing 2 reavers. I then add 4 facts to finish the job when he has teched to DTs. I actually had scan at this point, but I just had scanned his base to see carrier tech also incoming. He is also trying to expand to the min only and the island (map is PYTH, cross positions). I fuck up bad with my scans and end up getting delayed a ton, but I end up taking out both is nat and his 4th base, while taking my 3rd. I begin to pump goliaths like mad when i realize he has also taken 3 oclock, and since I suck balls against carriers he starts raping my push with a now alarming amount of carriers. eventually He just builds massive amounts of cannons until he has like 15 carriers and runs me over. OMFG IT WAS SO STUPID HE WAS SO BAD ITS NOT FAIRRRR
sry for the rage post LOL
thats only because of your noobness-.-
|
On June 18 2009 09:48 Aqo[il] wrote:Show nested quote +On June 18 2009 09:35 Archaic wrote:On June 18 2009 09:27 MeriaDoKk wrote: just 1a2a3a to C- As sad as it is, it doesn't work =(. you're not trying hard enough You have to select your units and hotkey them before you 1a2a3a
hahah
|
On June 18 2009 11:59 coltrane wrote:Show nested quote +On June 18 2009 11:35 dekuschrub wrote: i lost the stupidest fucking game today (OF COURSE AGAINST PROTOSS)
he went 1 gate no range into reaver. I FD all the way into his main leaving nothing but the reaver.. by the time he reaches my base I have pretty much a full turret ring as well as my nat completely up. He kills about 2 supply depots and 3 SCVs with his reaver, before I eventually kill his shuttle containing 2 reavers. I then add 4 facts to finish the job when he has teched to DTs. I actually had scan at this point, but I just had scanned his base to see carrier tech also incoming. He is also trying to expand to the min only and the island (map is PYTH, cross positions). I fuck up bad with my scans and end up getting delayed a ton, but I end up taking out both is nat and his 4th base, while taking my 3rd. I begin to pump goliaths like mad when i realize he has also taken 3 oclock, and since I suck balls against carriers he starts raping my push with a now alarming amount of carriers. eventually He just builds massive amounts of cannons until he has like 15 carriers and runs me over. OMFG IT WAS SO STUPID HE WAS SO BAD ITS NOT FAIRRRR
sry for the rage post LOL thats only because of your noobness-.-
Nah dude, losing to a late carrier tech and dt's is CHEESE. That build is CHEESE. The only build Protoss can do that isnt cheese is 4 gate goon.
Duh.
|
I didn't say it was cheese.
i just said it was really really dumb
|
is awesome32248 Posts
|
On June 18 2009 11:35 dekuschrub wrote: i lost the stupidest fucking game today (OF COURSE AGAINST PROTOSS)
he went 1 gate no range into reaver. I FD all the way into his main leaving nothing but the reaver.. by the time he reaches my base I have pretty much a full turret ring as well as my nat completely up. He kills about 2 supply depots and 3 SCVs with his reaver, before I eventually kill his shuttle containing 2 reavers. I then add 4 facts to finish the job when he has teched to DTs. I actually had scan at this point, but I just had scanned his base to see carrier tech also incoming. He is also trying to expand to the min only and the island (map is PYTH, cross positions). I fuck up bad with my scans and end up getting delayed a ton, but I end up taking out both is nat and his 4th base, while taking my 3rd. I begin to pump goliaths like mad when i realize he has also taken 3 oclock, and since I suck balls against Protoss he starts raping my push with a now alarming amount of carriers. eventually He just builds massive amounts of cannons until he has like 15 carriers and runs me over. OMFG IT WAS SO STUPID HE WAS SO BAD ITS NOT FAIRRRR
sry for the rage post LOL
|
hmm i like this better than the, YAY GOT HIT D+ threads
heh, mildly better
|
Why so much protoss hate? One race always has to be the easiest one. I remember when everyone made fun of terran because it sucked, lol. (Before boxer)
|
On June 18 2009 13:51 ghermination wrote: Why so much protoss hate? One race always has to be the easiest one. I remember when everyone made fun of terran because it sucked, lol. (Before boxer) Well then there will always be hate towards the easiest race.
|
On June 18 2009 12:31 dekuschrub wrote: I didn't say it was cheese.
i just said it was really really dumb
Are you the type of person that calls people who beat you noob? If you lose to really really dumb stuff you must be really really really dumb.
|
I actually find zerg to be the easiest race at the very low levels, just because of how their builds work. I.E. in a ZvT the zerg makes all the moves (disregarding mech, not enough experience with it). While the zerg only has to learn how to execute buildorders, the terran has to learn how to see, react, and execute the proper counter. The zerg can pretty much just pick a build at random. And because of this the terran has to learn alot of different timings, how to defend, when, with what, and where? Good building placement is also ridiculously important. Exposing a science facility to mutalisks can usually mean death right there, which is another thing the zerg doesn't have to bother with. The same concept applies to PvZ, and to some extent PvT where the terran has to strike before Protoss' econ kicks in, or else GG. So at the very lowest of levels, zerg is easier than protoss, protoss is easier than terran. I also think it's easier for a weaker protoss player to beat a stronger terran (strengths in relation to each other), because of the more variations that a toss player has with his builds, which skews the timings. Same thing for weaker zerg against protoss. Thoughts?
|
United States11390 Posts
On June 18 2009 20:41 Adeny wrote: I actually find zerg to be the easiest race at the very low levels, just because of how their builds work. I.E. in a ZvT the zerg makes all the moves (disregarding mech, not enough experience with it). While the zerg only has to learn how to execute buildorders, the terran has to learn how to see, react, and execute the proper counter. The zerg can pretty much just pick a build at random. And because of this the terran has to learn alot of different timings, how to defend, when, with what, and where? Good building placement is also ridiculously important. Exposing a science facility to mutalisks can usually mean death right there, which is another thing the zerg doesn't have to bother with. The same concept applies to PvZ, and to some extent PvT where the terran has to strike before Protoss' econ kicks in, or else GG. So at the very lowest of levels, zerg is easier than protoss, protoss is easier than terran. I also think it's easier for a weaker protoss player to beat a stronger terran (strengths in relation to each other), because of the more variations that a toss player has with his builds, which skews the timings. Same thing for weaker zerg against protoss. Thoughts?
On June 17 2009 10:29 Underwhelmed wrote:Your name seemed very familiar,and I just figured out why:
|
On June 18 2009 20:41 Adeny wrote: I actually find zerg to be the easiest race at the very low levels, just because of how their builds work. I.E. in a ZvT the zerg makes all the moves (disregarding mech, not enough experience with it). While the zerg only has to learn how to execute buildorders, the terran has to learn how to see, react, and execute the proper counter. The zerg can pretty much just pick a build at random. And because of this the terran has to learn alot of different timings, how to defend, when, with what, and where? Good building placement is also ridiculously important. Exposing a science facility to mutalisks can usually mean death right there, which is another thing the zerg doesn't have to bother with. The same concept applies to PvZ, and to some extent PvT where the terran has to strike before Protoss' econ kicks in, or else GG. So at the very lowest of levels, zerg is easier than protoss, protoss is easier than terran. I also think it's easier for a weaker protoss player to beat a stronger terran (strengths in relation to each other), because of the more variations that a toss player has with his builds, which skews the timings. Same thing for weaker zerg against protoss. Thoughts? MNM AND GOLIATH
TANKS COST GAS
YOUR MOM.
|
On June 18 2009 23:31 koreasilver wrote: MNM AND GOLIATH
Tell that to Flash.
|
On June 18 2009 09:48 Aqo[il] wrote:Show nested quote +On June 18 2009 09:35 Archaic wrote:On June 18 2009 09:27 MeriaDoKk wrote: just 1a2a3a to C- As sad as it is, it doesn't work =(. you're not trying hard enough You have to select your units and hotkey them before you 1a2a3a
lol
ctrl1ctrl2ctrl3? HAHAHA
|
my blog is turning into a flame fest lol
|
On June 18 2009 20:41 Adeny wrote: I actually find zerg to be the easiest race at the very low levels, just because of how their builds work. I.E. in a ZvT the zerg makes all the moves (disregarding mech, not enough experience with it). While the zerg only has to learn how to execute buildorders, the terran has to learn how to see, react, and execute the proper counter. The zerg can pretty much just pick a build at random. And because of this the terran has to learn alot of different timings, how to defend, when, with what, and where? Good building placement is also ridiculously important. Exposing a science facility to mutalisks can usually mean death right there, which is another thing the zerg doesn't have to bother with. The same concept applies to PvZ, and to some extent PvT where the terran has to strike before Protoss' econ kicks in, or else GG. So at the very lowest of levels, zerg is easier than protoss, protoss is easier than terran. I also think it's easier for a weaker protoss player to beat a stronger terran (strengths in relation to each other), because of the more variations that a toss player has with his builds, which skews the timings. Same thing for weaker zerg against protoss. Thoughts?
A terran stole my gas(I play zerg). First I lol'd. Then I adapted by just taking the gas at my nat instead.
Also screw your shit. You don't have to sacrifice precious workers just to build something.
Zerg placement not important? Enjoy vultures in your main popping drones and laying down mini-nukes. Or how about placing scourge against drops? Maybe positioning overlords against sairs too? Jeez.
|
Sure sounds like you're a real toss yes. :p
|
i get confused with how offended people get when you say their race is the easiest to learn
|
+ Show Spoiler +On June 18 2009 22:49 Harem wrote:Show nested quote +On June 18 2009 20:41 Adeny wrote: I actually find zerg to be the easiest race at the very low levels, just because of how their builds work. I.E. in a ZvT the zerg makes all the moves (disregarding mech, not enough experience with it). While the zerg only has to learn how to execute buildorders, the terran has to learn how to see, react, and execute the proper counter. The zerg can pretty much just pick a build at random. And because of this the terran has to learn alot of different timings, how to defend, when, with what, and where? Good building placement is also ridiculously important. Exposing a science facility to mutalisks can usually mean death right there, which is another thing the zerg doesn't have to bother with. The same concept applies to PvZ, and to some extent PvT where the terran has to strike before Protoss' econ kicks in, or else GG. So at the very lowest of levels, zerg is easier than protoss, protoss is easier than terran. I also think it's easier for a weaker protoss player to beat a stronger terran (strengths in relation to each other), because of the more variations that a toss player has with his builds, which skews the timings. Same thing for weaker zerg against protoss. Thoughts? Show nested quote +On June 17 2009 10:29 Underwhelmed wrote:Your name seemed very familiar,and I just figured out why: lmao
|
Vatican City State491 Posts
The point system on ICCUP is actually very irritating, because it promotes playing lots of games. Im C- in 2v2 for example with thrash stats of 40-50 for example. It doesnt mean that I cant play the game, but I dont like the idea that anyone can get 2000pts if he has just a 25% winning ratio and plays enough games. I would really prefer the old neo-gamei system - you lose the same ammount of points that you can win. Of course this has big disadvantages as people start to dodge a lot, but this is actually a real term of proving skill. At this moment you can get C+ with like 50-80 stats which is equal to a 30% win rate...
|
|
|
|