Do you play in fullscreen, or windowed?
What monitor do you use for playing Remastered?
Forum Index > BW General |
krocan.cz
56 Posts
Do you play in fullscreen, or windowed? | ||
Jealous
9974 Posts
| ||
sM.Zik
Canada2542 Posts
Full screen at 1080p | ||
Shana
Indonesia1814 Posts
| ||
npnl19
Russian Federation24 Posts
27" 1920x1080, VA, 60hz (Overclocked to 75hz) Best settings for Remastered for me are: Fullscreen mode, Fast Sync (or VSync off), 300 fps cap, Disable mouse scaling, Hardware cursor On, sensitivity 95%, (Logitech G102 btw best mouse i ever had ever) As for monitor, planning to update in 2-3 years for something larger and with G-Sync | ||
krocan.cz
56 Posts
This one: http://prod.danawa.com/info/?pcode=3537142 Now Im thinking about it. What do you think? | ||
fazek42
Hungary438 Posts
"Enjoy a superb viewing experience thanks to this impressive HP vs19e 19-inch flat-panel TFT screen with high-quality integrated speakers! With the vs19e you can experience uncompromised viewing performance for video, photos, games and more thanks to the monitors 1280 x 1024 optimal resolution, fast 8 ms response rate, and 700:1 contrast for photo-realistic quality. The vs19e is simple to set up and use, it's also the perfect match for your HP or Compaq PC and peripherals! Don't have enough desktop space? It's OK because the vs19e is wall-mountable! Order today!" xD Playing SC:R on full-screen and SD on this beauty :D (I have just recently ordered a Dell Ultrasharp U2518D though.) | ||
HaFnium
United Kingdom1068 Posts
I think most ppl'd play with fullscreen unless they are playing ums/obing.. | ||
Cheesefome
304 Posts
On October 22 2018 03:10 HaFnium wrote: Wondering the advantages of 144hz monitor vs the standard ones. Am currenting using 24" 144hz monitor. I think most ppl'd play with fullscreen unless they are playing ums/obing.. If you play a lot of first person shooters where there is a ton of movement then yeah, I would invest on a higher hz monitor, otherwise it isn't really necessary. | ||
QuadroX
385 Posts
| ||
Moataz
Egypt267 Posts
On October 22 2018 04:34 QuadroX wrote: There are no good 4:3 monitors anymore. So I had to play on a fucking 1080p monitor with black bars on the sides (benq gl2450). More people hate black bars, although away from SCR, there is a solution. God forgive Blizzard for what they've done, Amen. | ||
PuRpOs3
United States42 Posts
| ||
Dante08
Singapore4101 Posts
| ||
XenOsky
Chile2142 Posts
| ||
Rovant1c
China69 Posts
(It seems that most FPS game players choose TN panel for fastest response time.) | ||
Moataz
Egypt267 Posts
On October 30 2018 18:40 XenOsky wrote: edit: wrong thread. Wake up , whats the time in your country? | ||
zerglingling
131 Posts
| ||
QuadroX
385 Posts
On October 30 2018 14:30 PuRpOs3 wrote: anybody know what moniter KSL/ WCS uses? Good question, Larva mentioned they have good monitors on KSL since he’s using the same model at home. | ||
QuadroX
385 Posts
On October 30 2018 19:11 zerglingling wrote: Some old 1280x1024 thing, on a monitor like this there's no difference between SD mode and 1.16 I believe on a monitor like this pixels are not square in SD mode or 1.16 if there are no horizontal black bars. It’s 5:4 aspect ratio while BW was designed for 4:3 (1280x960). | ||
QuadroX
385 Posts
On October 30 2018 18:45 Rovant1c wrote: Which panel type is better for RTS game:IPS or TN? (It seems that most FPS game players choose TN panel for fastest response time.) I would go for faster refresh rate and response time TN. IPS, VA make sense for graphics/video editing to show you the perfect colors on any view angle. You don’t need to care about view angle since you’re sitting in front of the screen. If you play on 60Hz (default rate) then you need 16ms or lower response time to support that. Today’s IPS monitors are even faster than that but more expensive than TN. If you go 120hz you need 8ms or lower response time. Today you can buy 240hz with 1ms response time or something crazy like that. I would chose this option if I had unlimited money. :D | ||
Navane
Netherlands2690 Posts
| ||
zerglingling
131 Posts
On October 31 2018 14:46 QuadroX wrote: I believe on a monitor like this pixels are not square in SD mode or 1.16 if there are no horizontal black bars. It’s 5:4 aspect ratio while BW was designed for 4:3 (1280x960). BW's resolution is 640x480 1.16 runs in exactly that, and the monitor's scaler does an okay-ish job at blowing it up. Windowed 2x also fits well. 1.2 runs the desktop resolution, and upscales while preserving the aspect with a letterbox, so I get an exact 2x scale with tiny bars above and below. | ||
krocan.cz
56 Posts
| ||
MeSaber
Sweden1221 Posts
im at 27" benQ 144Hz like 50 cm away from screen. It works to play BW but any bigger and i would have issues, or have to move screen backwards (which is not possible for me atm). Edit: Oh and moving screen backwards would defeat the purpose of having a bigger screen. Also its a subjective matter as any noob can claim it works wonders.. While pros most likely will not agree. | ||
EndingLife
United States1558 Posts
On November 02 2019 06:19 krocan.cz wrote: Do you think is it good idea to play remastered in 32" monitor? 2560 I've been using a 32" for quite some time. While microing is easier than ever, multitasking is pretty damn hard. If you play an aggressive style and like short games, a bigger monitor makes sense. It has its pros and cons though. | ||
TT1
Canada9926 Posts
mouse moves way more fluidly | ||
seriosity
United States214 Posts
| ||
SchAmToo
United States1141 Posts
I really like this monitor, I have 3 of them on a stand. | ||
Piste
6137 Posts
| ||
TT1
Canada9926 Posts
On November 03 2019 14:45 SchAmToo wrote: ASUS VG24QE. 24” 144hz. I agree with TT1 you notice 144 hz a little and it’s more pleasant. Obvi not needed. I really like this monitor, I have 3 of them on a stand. got the same monitor, no stand is a deal breaker for me | ||
SCWes
Canada74 Posts
| ||
BonitiilloO
Dominican Republic588 Posts
| ||
| ||