|
On April 08 2019 04:12 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:Show nested quote +On April 08 2019 04:11 Eywa- wrote: If it's a win condition that doesn't involve town winning.... HRMMMM It just sounds like an overly complicated mason. Doesn't seem to indicate anything about town or scum. You on the other hand seem to think that your alignment can be flipped. That I don't like. My, Grack and Damdred all win if LS recruits us.
|
On April 08 2019 04:13 Eywa- wrote:Show nested quote +On April 08 2019 04:12 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:On April 08 2019 04:11 Eywa- wrote: If it's a win condition that doesn't involve town winning.... HRMMMM It just sounds like an overly complicated mason. Doesn't seem to indicate anything about town or scum. You on the other hand seem to think that your alignment can be flipped. That I don't like. My, Grack and Damdred all win if LS recruits us. Oh yeah, we don't win with town though if that happens.. SORRY
|
On April 08 2019 04:15 Tumblewood wrote:Show nested quote +On April 08 2019 04:14 Eywa- wrote:On April 08 2019 04:13 Eywa- wrote:On April 08 2019 04:12 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:On April 08 2019 04:11 Eywa- wrote: If it's a win condition that doesn't involve town winning.... HRMMMM It just sounds like an overly complicated mason. Doesn't seem to indicate anything about town or scum. You on the other hand seem to think that your alignment can be flipped. That I don't like. My, Grack and Damdred all win if LS recruits us. Oh yeah, we don't win with town though if that happens.. SORRY what exactly do you know about LS?????? Uhmm... he full claimed recruiter...
On April 07 2019 23:29 LightningStrike wrote: So ya my role is actually kinda shitty but I can deal with it because I only get to recruit Arbic/Hindu mathematicians into a qt.
|
On April 08 2019 04:16 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:Show nested quote +On April 08 2019 04:14 Eywa- wrote:On April 08 2019 04:13 Eywa- wrote:On April 08 2019 04:12 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:On April 08 2019 04:11 Eywa- wrote: If it's a win condition that doesn't involve town winning.... HRMMMM It just sounds like an overly complicated mason. Doesn't seem to indicate anything about town or scum. You on the other hand seem to think that your alignment can be flipped. That I don't like. My, Grack and Damdred all win if LS recruits us. Oh yeah, we don't win with town though if that happens.. SORRY So you're the only one who has said this means you don't win with the town. I'm comfortable lynching you now. I'm not. Rayn claimed multiple win cons, several people have, so yes.. Lynch me when I'm trying to lynch a CLAIMED recruiter who FULFILLS an anti-town win condition.
Fucking lynch me.
|
On April 08 2019 04:17 Vivax wrote: The correct play here is to kill LS so his buddies have to play with town instead of fulfilling their selfish win conditions. THIS IS WHAT I'M SAYING
|
On April 08 2019 04:17 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:Show nested quote +On April 08 2019 04:16 Eywa- wrote:On April 08 2019 04:15 Tumblewood wrote:On April 08 2019 04:14 Eywa- wrote:On April 08 2019 04:13 Eywa- wrote:On April 08 2019 04:12 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:On April 08 2019 04:11 Eywa- wrote: If it's a win condition that doesn't involve town winning.... HRMMMM It just sounds like an overly complicated mason. Doesn't seem to indicate anything about town or scum. You on the other hand seem to think that your alignment can be flipped. That I don't like. My, Grack and Damdred all win if LS recruits us. Oh yeah, we don't win with town though if that happens.. SORRY what exactly do you know about LS?????? Uhmm... he full claimed recruiter... On April 07 2019 23:29 LightningStrike wrote: So ya my role is actually kinda shitty but I can deal with it because I only get to recruit Arbic/Hindu mathematicians into a qt. He says recruit them into a qt. He doesn't say change alignments He doesn't say leave the game idk where you got all these ideas from. So the 4 people who claimed the same role as me do not have the same victory conditions is what you're saying? Your logical reasoning is truly fascinating. Tell me more.
|
On April 08 2019 04:19 Tumblewood wrote:Show nested quote +On April 08 2019 04:16 Eywa- wrote:On April 08 2019 04:15 Tumblewood wrote:On April 08 2019 04:14 Eywa- wrote:On April 08 2019 04:13 Eywa- wrote:On April 08 2019 04:12 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:On April 08 2019 04:11 Eywa- wrote: If it's a win condition that doesn't involve town winning.... HRMMMM It just sounds like an overly complicated mason. Doesn't seem to indicate anything about town or scum. You on the other hand seem to think that your alignment can be flipped. That I don't like. My, Grack and Damdred all win if LS recruits us. Oh yeah, we don't win with town though if that happens.. SORRY what exactly do you know about LS?????? Uhmm... he full claimed recruiter... On April 07 2019 23:29 LightningStrike wrote: So ya my role is actually kinda shitty but I can deal with it because I only get to recruit Arbic/Hindu mathematicians into a qt. ok yes but you seem to know that you can win if he recruits you, etc, and i only know that he can recruit people into a QT. i have 0 extra information about him Everyone who shares my role can win if they get recruited, Rayn also claimed that he wins if he gets recruited... So killing a claimed recruiter makes sense.
Everyone sharing my faction is then confirmed town that can only win with TOWN
Grack, Damdred and myself.
|
On April 08 2019 04:20 Mig wrote: How does it make any sense that Eywa says he wins if LS recruits him but then he also wants to lynch LS? Because it forwards the town win condition....
|
Alright, so we're not lynching a claimed recruiter when people who get recruited automatically win.
Sweet... The current highest wagon is trying to lynch someone who's pushing the only pro-town lynch here... K, I guess I just make that wagon bigger?
|
Well, LS, at least you know with certainty now that you can take your action on me tonight :D
|
Like, I don't understand this town
|
On April 08 2019 04:20 Mig wrote: How does it make any sense that Eywa says he wins if LS recruits him but then he also wants to lynch LS? The most reasonable answer is that I'm actually a roman recruiter or pleb... Both are false, I win with LS or with town, but if town refuses my offer, I guess I'll take the 1/3 shot that LS picks me.
|
On April 08 2019 04:25 Holyflare wrote: Why would you want to kill a recruiter who removes people from the game if they win :D
that's literally like christmas for free lynches and information Because those people are already confirmed town...
|
On April 08 2019 02:09 raynpelikoneet wrote: So this game is actually really stupid and i am not really interested in trying properly. There is a counterpart in Romans for LS and Damdred apparently is my "counter role". Soo the roman recruiter can recruit me or you can lynch me or whatever i dont really care, if any of us (damdred, LS, whoever has the roles similar) are mafia this game is even more stupid.
I am going to vote for Eywa- because he just added people to his scumlist without apparently having even properly read their posts. You think he wants to be recruited by the Romans just for shits and giggles? MZ your reasoning is so bad when many people have claimed similar roles to what I'm claiming.
|
On April 08 2019 04:27 Tumblewood wrote:Show nested quote +On April 08 2019 04:26 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:On April 08 2019 04:25 Holyflare wrote: Why would you want to kill a recruiter who removes people from the game if they win :D
that's literally like christmas for free lynches and information HOW THE FUCK DO WE KNOW THEY GET REMOVED FROM THE GAME? Only Eywa is saying this. He has way too much information about this shit. Literally all we know comes from LS who said he gets to put people in a QT. Where the fuck did we get this whole "removed from the game" bullshit from. !!!!!! We don't know that they get removed from the game. It's just a reasonable assumption... Why would they continue playing if they've already won?
|
I've literally never seen a mafia game where people don't want to lynch a claimed recruiter that is not a claimed mason.
|
On April 08 2019 04:29 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:Show nested quote +On April 08 2019 04:27 Holyflare wrote:On April 08 2019 04:25 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:On April 08 2019 04:23 Eywa- wrote: Alright, so we're not lynching a claimed recruiter when people who get recruited automatically win.
Sweet... The current highest wagon is trying to lynch someone who's pushing the only pro-town lynch here... K, I guess I just make that wagon bigger? You are the only person saying this. You clearly know something the rest of us don't about how this mechanic works. You want to lynch someone for their role, that is not a pro-town lynch lmao. Your lack of full claim at this point is a scumclaim imo. My role works exactly the same way just on an individual level. I don't believe it makes him mafia, he just has an alternate win con that would remove all those people from the game but he can still win with town. It's literally what my PM says too and why it's so shit to put in a game because it's anti town to remove 1 person, let alone 4-5. That's why we should be lynching people we think are mafia. These people can play with the shitty mechanics and recruit people for their selfish victory if they wish but the fun of mafia is solving alignments for me so they can do what they want. So HF let me get this straight, your roll LITERALLY says that you can "remove" someone from the game? Because that's not at all what LS has claimed. My role says I win if LS recruits me, you can bet that I will stop playing if that happens.
|
On April 08 2019 04:32 LightningStrike wrote: I sort of here but the people who want me to lynch me because of my claim and not because of my play is pretty scummy. I dont I get removed from the game if I get my alternate win condition fulfilled but will ask Onegu on that. But why would you continue playing if you won via your alternate condition?
|
On April 08 2019 04:33 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:Show nested quote +On April 08 2019 04:31 Eywa- wrote:On April 08 2019 04:29 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:On April 08 2019 04:27 Holyflare wrote:On April 08 2019 04:25 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:On April 08 2019 04:23 Eywa- wrote: Alright, so we're not lynching a claimed recruiter when people who get recruited automatically win.
Sweet... The current highest wagon is trying to lynch someone who's pushing the only pro-town lynch here... K, I guess I just make that wagon bigger? You are the only person saying this. You clearly know something the rest of us don't about how this mechanic works. You want to lynch someone for their role, that is not a pro-town lynch lmao. Your lack of full claim at this point is a scumclaim imo. My role works exactly the same way just on an individual level. I don't believe it makes him mafia, he just has an alternate win con that would remove all those people from the game but he can still win with town. It's literally what my PM says too and why it's so shit to put in a game because it's anti town to remove 1 person, let alone 4-5. That's why we should be lynching people we think are mafia. These people can play with the shitty mechanics and recruit people for their selfish victory if they wish but the fun of mafia is solving alignments for me so they can do what they want. So HF let me get this straight, your roll LITERALLY says that you can "remove" someone from the game? Because that's not at all what LS has claimed. My role says I win if LS recruits me, you can bet that I will stop playing if that happens. Ok cool let's kill you then. LS has said that you'll be put in a QT with him. Cool, then he'll recruit one of the other players that have claimed my role and I'll be proven right and you'll look like a bum.
|
On April 08 2019 04:33 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:Show nested quote +On April 08 2019 04:31 Eywa- wrote:On April 08 2019 04:29 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:On April 08 2019 04:27 Holyflare wrote:On April 08 2019 04:25 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:On April 08 2019 04:23 Eywa- wrote: Alright, so we're not lynching a claimed recruiter when people who get recruited automatically win.
Sweet... The current highest wagon is trying to lynch someone who's pushing the only pro-town lynch here... K, I guess I just make that wagon bigger? You are the only person saying this. You clearly know something the rest of us don't about how this mechanic works. You want to lynch someone for their role, that is not a pro-town lynch lmao. Your lack of full claim at this point is a scumclaim imo. My role works exactly the same way just on an individual level. I don't believe it makes him mafia, he just has an alternate win con that would remove all those people from the game but he can still win with town. It's literally what my PM says too and why it's so shit to put in a game because it's anti town to remove 1 person, let alone 4-5. That's why we should be lynching people we think are mafia. These people can play with the shitty mechanics and recruit people for their selfish victory if they wish but the fun of mafia is solving alignments for me so they can do what they want. So HF let me get this straight, your roll LITERALLY says that you can "remove" someone from the game? Because that's not at all what LS has claimed. My role says I win if LS recruits me, you can bet that I will stop playing if that happens. Ok cool let's kill you then. LS has said that you'll be put in a QT with him. Honestly, like... What? 1.5 hours left? You're on the highest wagon 7-2 and you're trying to start a brand new wagon. That's just terrible mafia play as any alignment.
|
|
|
|