[IEM] New York NA/SA Player Replacement Tourny - Page 2
Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
IzieBoy
United States865 Posts
| ||
Xcobidoo
Sweden1871 Posts
| ||
DoomsVille
Canada4885 Posts
GL to him though. Hope he makes it through. | ||
-reveNge-
77 Posts
| ||
pHaRSiDE
United States752 Posts
| ||
Badfatpanda
United States9719 Posts
On October 04 2011 08:33 -reveNge- wrote: 7 zergs 1 protoss as the 8 contestants O_O According to popular belief this means Zerg is OP and we need an 80 page thread denouncing ESL for creating such a horrid spectacle for us to watch | ||
ottersareneat
United States55 Posts
On October 04 2011 06:02 pHaRSiDE wrote: Because we hosted 3 separate qualifiers thats why we can't simply go down the line of the next person. In the other format where we had a championship bracket, then yes we would go straight down the line to the next person as its 1 tournament. When you have 3 tournaments you simply can't do it in a fair way. So another mini tournament is the most fair way. Gix, owmygroin, and strifecro will participate as they all can go. As far as your fights with carmac and shawn, it a little odd considering this was approved by Carsten. the $600 on the prize list is the stipend pay. You hosted different qualifiers for the other Global Challenges, too. I was told that the policy still applies. I agree that it is "odd" that this was approved given the depth of the past discussions that I've had. "Odd" is kind of a nice way of putting it. I would describe the situation as "internal communication breakdowns and lack of consistent policy enforcement." | ||
Derity
Germany2951 Posts
So why not apply the same rule for the same qualifier? just take the 4th from the 1st qualifier, in which qxc succeded. | ||
pHaRSiDE
United States752 Posts
On October 04 2011 08:52 EGalex wrote: You hosted different qualifiers for the other Global Challenges, too. I was told that the policy still applies. I agree that it is "odd" that this was approved given the depth of the past discussions that I've had. "Odd" is kind of a nice way of putting it. I would describe the situation as "internal communication breakdowns and lack of consistent policy enforcement." We hosted different qualifiers that qualified into 1 championship bracket tournament for the last 2 global challenges. This time around we hosted 3 qualifiers that directly qualified the players into the event and not a championship bracket. Things change when you are the host country because it jumps from 2 players being allowed to attend to 8 players being allowed to attend. Is it a break down of communication? Maybe, but its more likely an adjustment to the situation at hand rather than a breakdown. I understand your concern for consistency, but this is not the same format as the past two global challenges. On October 04 2011 09:07 Derity wrote: for IEM Guangzhou you had a rematch for 3rd place in the 2nd qualifier. HasuObs lost to Xlord, but Xlord withdraw... So why not apply the same rule for the same qualifier? just take the 4th from the 1st qualifier, in which qxc succeded. Fourth was Attero who qualified in the next one. | ||
ssg
United States1768 Posts
| ||
Torte de Lini
Germany38463 Posts
| ||
Derity
Germany2951 Posts
On October 04 2011 09:09 pHaRSiDE wrote: Fourth was Attero who qualified in the next one. oh, sry, i missed that... | ||
Xeris
Iran17695 Posts
| ||
Sfydjklm
United States9218 Posts
On October 04 2011 09:33 Torte de Lini wrote: Dhalism and GiX are equally good players. Dhalism is a no skill newbie! GiX has beaten HuK at one of the WCG qualifiers tho(to win a slot at national finals) | ||
iNcontroL
USA29055 Posts
we are very proud of our two EG's going axslav and strife! | ||
Axeltoss
United States283 Posts
| ||
pHaRSiDE
United States752 Posts
All replays available at the brackets! Just click the "vs" | ||
stormLP
Canada19 Posts
| ||
Thrax
Canada1755 Posts
Good luck at IEM NY. That weekend will be pretty epic. | ||
HaCkTeR
Chile29 Posts
| ||
| ||