War of the Roses - EG.DeMuslim vs d.BlinG - £1000 - Page 47
Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
Badfatpanda
United States9719 Posts
| ||
Funkydonky
950 Posts
On January 31 2012 06:24 SC2NeCro wrote: Do you guys know HOW good DeMusliM was at one point? Back in 2011, I saw him get #1 GM on NA and EU, he played people like Stephano (no disrespect to Stephano) and he made me think Stephano was someone not special. That's how much DeMu owned people. They almost never played against each other, and many players can get first on NA and EU, they just don't think its worth their time... | ||
Stancel
Singapore15360 Posts
| ||
ViRii
United States826 Posts
| ||
Froob
United Kingdom342 Posts
| ||
SayHello
Czech Republic147 Posts
| ||
Azhrei16
United States284 Posts
On January 31 2012 06:22 ftd.rain wrote: Instead of calling people stupid and suggesting your low level ideas, try to think if they will actually work, the seeker missiles will do mininum damage to the zealots while the majority of your marines die, that is if you manage to emp all of the hts , there's a reason they aren't used, and it's not because competitive sc2 lacks a genius like you. Okay, really. I did not call YOU stupid. I am not suggesting low level ideas. What you need to realize is I'm trying to engage in a strategic discussion, which I have realized in the past is impossible to do on TeamLiquid now. The point of a discussion is both people throw out ideas and counters and both realize that each person may have a point. High Templar can Feedback the Ravens, but alternatively I can argue that the Vikings/Marines could have shot down the Warp Prism. Ghosts could have sniped the High Templars. Then you can come back with "well they cost too much", and then I come back with "it would be nice to see someone TRY these things." Neither one of us is wrong, I am not posting anything in anger. I'm just suggesting things, trying to add to a discussion. You are the one coming back and just saying I am wrong. That is not how a strategy discussion works. I understand your points, and I am not saying they are bad nor wrong. I am just trying to say that yes, the Seeker Missiles could potentially cause friendly fire onto the Terran units due to the Chargelots, BUT a certain level of micro could be invoked to make sure the friendly fire damage is mitigated. I'm sorry if you just want to shoot down everything I say because you just want to be a jerk or something but that's not how I'm approaching it and things would be much better around here if everyone took that perspective. Your points are valid, but so are mine. Just because I try and suggest things and have a competent conversation does not mean I consider myself "a sc2 genius". Also, Hunter Seeker Missile does a flat 100 damage, regardless of Armor and Shield upgrades. So yes, it would devastate the Zealots. | ||
XaCez
Sweden6991 Posts
| ||
SC2NeCro
Canada507 Posts
| ||
Drazerk
United Kingdom31255 Posts
| ||
Jono7272
United Kingdom6328 Posts
| ||
dragonborn
4781 Posts
because demuslim is in same team with PuMa. | ||
Olinimm
1471 Posts
| ||
[17]Purple
United Kingdom3489 Posts
| ||
Seiniyta
Belgium1815 Posts
| ||
Bagration
United States18282 Posts
| ||
HeavenS
Colombia2259 Posts
| ||
Laids
United Kingdom596 Posts
| ||
MVTaylor
United Kingdom2893 Posts
| ||
ZedX_
United Kingdom57 Posts
| ||
| ||