Seahawks Win the Superbowl - Page 2
Forum Index > Closed |
IronMentality
United States1129 Posts
| ||
iNcontroL
USA29055 Posts
| ||
TreY
United States997 Posts
Edit - Just looked, if the standings stayed how they are now, the Jags would play the Patriots in the 1st round. That'll be fun. | ||
CaucasianAsian
Korea (South)11558 Posts
| ||
DTDominion
United States2148 Posts
i'm not a huge steeler fan but they do have what it takes. i would still bet on colts winning the superbowl. | ||
NuclearAntelope
United States1369 Posts
On December 20 2005 02:32 {88}iNcontroL wrote: no offense / not good on the road How can a seahawks fan accuse another team of not being good on the road? | ||
pooper-scooper
United States3108 Posts
| ||
oneofthem
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
| ||
Hot_Bid
Braavos36362 Posts
On December 20 2005 04:30 DTDominion wrote: the steelers are the ONLY team in the league tough enough to effectively defend the colts offense. and the steeler offense can be good. have you watched this season? the steelers defense got manhandled by the colts O-line. the steelers defense is nowhere near as good as it was the year they made it to the championship game. plus how can they be the only team when San Diego just "effectively defended" the Colts two days ago? the jags did as well in week two, and i'm sure the bears can as well... it's just that those teams can't score on the colts, but SD can, so indy better pray that SD doesn't make the playoffs because they're the only AFC team with a realistic chance of beating them. denver i guess has a shot, but the colts have owned them the last few years. | ||
KOFgokuon
United States14885 Posts
On December 20 2005 00:53 IronMentality wrote: As a Bears fan who was at one of the top ten coldest games in Soldier Field history last night, the Bears with a healthy Rex Grossman, and Mike Brown are going to be the best team in the NFC. Period. bears defense has a ridiculous amount of playmakers. vasher tillman brown brown ogunleye urlacher. they have a physical and fast enough defense to give peyton manning problems. whether or not they can get to the superbowl is another problem. i highly doubt rex grossman is the solution to the quarterback woes. he's proven absolutely nothing at the professional level (except that he gets FAR too much). i'm not saying that switching was a good idea, grossman will prolly be at least as good as orton was. either way though, if they can't ride their defense all the way, they're in trouble | ||
iNcontroL
USA29055 Posts
On December 20 2005 11:27 NuclearAntelope wrote: How can a seahawks fan accuse another team of not being good on the road? You are an idiot. Do i have to be a fan of the best road team to look at a team and see they are bad on the road? Im a fan of Brian Urlacher but can i also be a fan of a running back? That "ok" with you? I prefer pasta, but i like seafood from time to time, is it ok? Im a fan of the Seahawks but their performance in any way shape or form has nothing to do with my opinion on other teams and how they do in different situations. | ||
NuclearAntelope
United States1369 Posts
First of all, the bears aren't THAT bad on the road. Yeah, they had that loss at cleveland, and I'd be lying if I said it looks impressive for chicago. They lost by two points at washington (not an easy place to play in, and washington's defense hadn't collapsed yet at that point in the season), and then lost a tough one at pittsburgh because bettis played amazing, and fast willy parker chipped in some more yards. When those two guys are running well, it is next to impossible to beat pitt in a ball control game, which is how the bears play. The bears went on the road and beat tampa bay (should have went to OT but a win is a win). Their real test will come in week 17, so let's not dismiss them as a truly bad road team until the regular season ends. It is a pity that they started out so shaky, because I don't think seattle could win a playoff game in chicago (even though seattle is looking really nice this year and I'd probably call them the favorites in the NFC). | ||
iNcontroL
USA29055 Posts
Seahawks in Chi town late december or early january is death for seahawks no doubt. But Bears comming to Seattle favors Seattle hugely, as i think is true for all the teams in NFC. And Seahawks my friend, have home field locked up this week or at the very least the next vs a team that the fucking Ravens offense tore up. Than we go to the Super bowl etc etc.. | ||
Sharkey
668 Posts
I am going!! Any advice? How cold will it be, what should I look out for, etc? Alexander is too good. | ||
NuclearAntelope
United States1369 Posts
-The seahawks have played overall very consistant and alexander is simply unstoppable. He's playing for a new contract I believe so I don't see him slowing down at all. -The bears' defense is incredible, and thomas jones is running the ball pretty well. I'm interested to see how the team responds to the new change at QB (orton did his job I guess but they really do need a bit more of a two-dimensional offense) -The giants are the toughest team to predict. They keep winning despite eli doing his best to throw every game away. Tiki is having a career year and their D is stepping up big time. If eli keeps throwing the ball to the other team, they will lose at seattle or at chicago. Panthers/bucs/redskins/vikings probably deserve to be mentioned too, but those are the main three right now. | ||
iNcontroL
USA29055 Posts
Sharkey: i may be going, shouldnt be to cold but dress warmly. Also a safe bet to wear a rain resistant coat. Bring the noise! Seattle is getting back the reputation for being a hostile ass environment and the 12th man is getting big again!.= | ||
decafchicken
United States19904 Posts
On December 20 2005 12:13 Hot_Bid wrote: have you watched this season? the steelers defense got manhandled by the colts O-line. the steelers defense is nowhere near as good as it was the year they made it to the championship game. plus how can they be the only team when San Diego just "effectively defended" the Colts two days ago? the jags did as well in week two, and i'm sure the bears can as well... it's just that those teams can't score on the colts, but SD can, so indy better pray that SD doesn't make the playoffs because they're the only AFC team with a realistic chance of beating them. denver i guess has a shot, but the colts have owned them the last few years. You realize that game meant absolutely nothing to the colts. They were already completely set for the playoffs. | ||
iNcontroL
USA29055 Posts
HOHO! | ||
mcmascote
Brazil1575 Posts
american rugby is art! I was a 49ers fan! | ||
ChoboCop
United States954 Posts
| ||
| ||