|
On May 07 2012 04:37 Nova_Terra wrote: Next, Kenpachi Absolutely worthless, if you consider his connection case useful i dunno what to say Vote: Kenpachi
Quit lurking.
|
United Kingdom35820 Posts
I'm starting to really dislike Nova_Terra. BH just pointed out that he hadn't posted in about a day. And looking at his filter, we have a whole stream of one-liners before that anyway.
A day without posting and we get this:
On May 07 2012 04:37 Nova_Terra wrote: Next, Kenpachi Absolutely worthless, if you consider his connection case useful i dunno what to say Vote: Kenpachi
Just nothingness. What I don't get is that he had a 'big' case on Mementoss where he reels off a bunch of whole things about why Mementoss is scummy. Except he's basically completely willing to abandon this read because he doesn't like a Kenpachi connection case. It's fair enough not liking connection cases, but to abandon your top read over it?
Also looking back this post is just smelly
On May 04 2012 14:46 Nova_Terra wrote: i resent the fact that many of the players here are well known and have much more sway because of it. I dont even feel like posting when someone will just as easily do something else and get followed. And also there are other reasons for not posting much other than being scum. Right now i think it would be correct to be shooting into the lurker crowd.
Reads as: "I don't wanna post. I don't wanna post. Kill the people who don't wanna post".
After the point I criticised him for not giving his reads, he subsquently gives Mementoss, then has a go at Kenpachi, a bunch of fluff, abandons case on mementoss, afks for a day and a one-liner on Kenpachi. I do not like at all.
|
lol i love how NT says "it would be correct to be shooting into the lurker crowd" while lurking himself
|
United Kingdom35820 Posts
Thanks jdub, I need you to rehash parts of my post for me <3
|
SA, you didn't answer that question about layabout that has been bugging me. It's even something that makes him townier in my eyes (still scum though), and yet you are unable to build on it.
And action = vote, calling somebody scum several times and not voting is definitely NOT action. It's more like "i make the impression i am active but i better wait till a wagon forms".
|
i just noticed that from your post and thought it was interesting. i guess it is rehashing. I'm just agreeing that it's strange and scummy
|
On May 07 2012 04:40 layabout wrote:Show nested quote +So anyway, I'm going to vote for layabout. All the other accusations are good, but one thing most people are missing is that if we had lynched BM and the modkills hadn't happened, we'd be completely lost right now. Lynching a lurker who had done almost literally nothing because he 'might hurt town' gives us zero information. We'd all still be running around in the chaos of day one on day two if kat/206 hadn't fucked up. Between that and the kat defense, I'm throwing my vote on him. If lay flips red then marvel is worth looking at just because of being so associated with both layabout and kat day one. Eiii, are you saying that we shouldn't lynch players that lurk because we gain very little information? You are aware of the fact that in the last 24 hours there have been about 100 posts from the 18 players still alive? And that half of the thread are lurking? And that both of the scum players that flipped were lurkers?
zzzzz
We should *kill* the lurkers by some means. We have ways of killing that isn't a lynch! Ideally we'd shoot all the lurkers and lynch people who took scummy positions. Maximum information (which is a good thing, no matter how you spin it)! That's not always possible, though-- but to lynch a lurker day one when we had a handful of lynch candidates actually puts the town behind. Really, ask yourself. If BM had been the only death day one, where would we be right now?
On May 07 2012 04:40 layabout wrote: You are reiterating a weak point ("kat defence") and saying that you should lynch me for the sake of "information". The link between myself and marvellosity that you are trying to create is weak. You fail to say what to do when i flip town. I cannot think of a worse reason to vote for me.
What? No, I don't think you should be lynched for information at all. You should be lynched for pushing BM day one, which accomplished nothing, together with your questionable defense of kat when it wasn't clear that he'd be modkilled, like several other people have pointed out before me. The part about marvel isn't an accusation, just an observation that'll come into play if you flip red.
Since you're so interested in what my plan is if you flip green: I'll probably say 'darn' and apologize for voting for the wrong person. And you'll be dead. I'm willing to take that chance, though!
|
Blazinghand
United States25546 Posts
On May 07 2012 04:37 Nova_Terra wrote: Next, Kenpachi Absolutely worthless, if you consider his connection case useful i dunno what to say Vote: Kenpachi
This is not acceptable.
Not even close.
You might have slipped past my D1 but not any more. Now you die like scum.
##unvote ##vote: Nova_Terra
Defend yourself or die like a punk
|
On May 07 2012 04:37 Nova_Terra wrote: Next, Kenpachi Absolutely worthless, if you consider his connection case useful i dunno what to say Vote: Kenpachi
Considering your doing about as much as him why not vote you?...
This seems familiar to another lynch that just happened, hmmmm BM townie lynch?
|
EBWOP:
Feeling slightly better about layabout for now....
So
##Vote: Nova_Terra
|
Paqman Marv BH and Mementoss are all saying the same thing at approximately the same time? weird, maybe you just agree with one another and want to quote it as if you found it yourself? O_o
|
Eiii you're either misunderstanding layabout on purpose or you haven't read the thread.
|
Blazinghand
United States25546 Posts
On May 07 2012 05:02 johnnywup wrote: Paqman Marv BH and Mementoss are all saying the same thing at approximately the same time? weird, maybe you just agree with one another and want to quote it as if you found it yourself? O_o
Would you rather I not explain myself?
|
United Kingdom35820 Posts
On May 07 2012 05:02 johnnywup wrote: Paqman Marv BH and Mementoss are all saying the same thing at approximately the same time? weird, maybe you just agree with one another and want to quote it as if you found it yourself? O_o
Instead of posting useless shit like this, why not devote your time to filters and a case like you promised?
|
Blazinghand
United States25546 Posts
On May 07 2012 05:05 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On May 07 2012 05:02 johnnywup wrote: Paqman Marv BH and Mementoss are all saying the same thing at approximately the same time? weird, maybe you just agree with one another and want to quote it as if you found it yourself? O_o Instead of posting useless shit like this, why not devote your time to filters and a case like you promised?
He might be trying to be intentionally unhelpful
|
On May 07 2012 04:59 Mementoss wrote:Show nested quote +On May 07 2012 04:37 Nova_Terra wrote: Next, Kenpachi Absolutely worthless, if you consider his connection case useful i dunno what to say Vote: Kenpachi Considering your doing about as much as him why not vote you?... This seems familiar to another lynch that just happened, hmmmm BM townie lynch? because i am town
|
On May 07 2012 05:11 Nova_Terra wrote:Show nested quote +On May 07 2012 04:59 Mementoss wrote:On May 07 2012 04:37 Nova_Terra wrote: Next, Kenpachi Absolutely worthless, if you consider his connection case useful i dunno what to say Vote: Kenpachi Considering your doing about as much as him why not vote you?... This seems familiar to another lynch that just happened, hmmmm BM townie lynch? because i am town
And you're purposely playing anti-town? :S
|
On May 07 2012 03:00 layabout wrote: Who is more likely to know if one of the mafia team is about to be modkilled? Members of the mafia team who can communicate privately and should know if their team mate is there (no) Members of town who can only see the thread and will have no idea who is watching the thread (yes)
Interesting idea mentioned by layabout. The WIFOM would be the mafia knew katina/206 would be modkilled, should they... A) backstab katina/206 and later claim "ooh I called it, dawgs!" [grush?], or should they... B) vote BM and not backstab in hope of katina/206 returning or avoiding someone analyzing their actions as option A)?[layabout/marvel/JW?]
On May 07 2012 04:23 Eiii wrote: So anyway, I'm going to vote for layabout. All the other accusations are good, but one thing most people are missing is that if we had lynched BM and the modkills hadn't happened, we'd be completely lost right now. Lynching a lurker who had done almost literally nothing because he 'might hurt town' gives us zero information. We'd all still be running around in the chaos of day one on day two if kat/206 hadn't fucked up. Between that and the kat defense, I'm throwing my vote on him. If lay flips red then marvel is worth looking at just because of being so associated with both layabout and kat day one.
I think lynching layabout is a good option because it can give us hints regardless of his alignment. More so, like Eiii mentions above, if he flips red, but also to some extent points to grush if he flips blue. I also agree with Eiii that if layabout IS red, marvel should be our next lynch.
However, I don't agree with Eiii on me being a good shoot option. T-T
Afterthought after F5: layabout, I think if you are blue, grush might be our next suspect.
|
Blazinghand
United States25546 Posts
On May 07 2012 05:11 Nova_Terra wrote:Show nested quote +On May 07 2012 04:59 Mementoss wrote:On May 07 2012 04:37 Nova_Terra wrote: Next, Kenpachi Absolutely worthless, if you consider his connection case useful i dunno what to say Vote: Kenpachi Considering your doing about as much as him why not vote you?... This seems familiar to another lynch that just happened, hmmmm BM townie lynch? because i am town
One a scale of Bill_Murray to 10 how serious are you right now? This isn't helping you, or the town.
|
United Kingdom35820 Posts
On May 07 2012 05:13 papapanda wrote:Show nested quote +On May 07 2012 03:00 layabout wrote: Who is more likely to know if one of the mafia team is about to be modkilled? Members of the mafia team who can communicate privately and should know if their team mate is there (no) Members of town who can only see the thread and will have no idea who is watching the thread (yes) Interesting idea mentioned by layabout. The WIFOM would be the mafia knew katina/206 would be modkilled, should they... A) backstab katina/206 and later claim "ooh I called it, dawgs!" [grush?], or should they... B) vote BM and not backstab in hope of katina/206 returning or avoiding someone analyzing their actions as option A)?[layabout/marvel/JW?] Show nested quote +On May 07 2012 04:23 Eiii wrote: So anyway, I'm going to vote for layabout. All the other accusations are good, but one thing most people are missing is that if we had lynched BM and the modkills hadn't happened, we'd be completely lost right now. Lynching a lurker who had done almost literally nothing because he 'might hurt town' gives us zero information. We'd all still be running around in the chaos of day one on day two if kat/206 hadn't fucked up. Between that and the kat defense, I'm throwing my vote on him. If lay flips red then marvel is worth looking at just because of being so associated with both layabout and kat day one. I think lynching layabout is a good option because it can give us hints regardless of his alignment. More so, like Eiii mentions above, if he flips red, but also to some extent points to grush if he flips blue. I also agree with Eiii that if layabout IS red, marvel should be our next lynch. However, I don't agree with Eiii on me being a good shoot option. T-T Afterthought after F5: layabout, I think if you are blue, grush might be our next suspect.
Good god. Are you calling layabout scum or not? And if so, why?
Useless post of connections without even making a stance on layabout's alignment, yukyukyukyukyuk.
|
|
|
|