Brackets for 2013 GSL Season 1 Up&Down Matches - Page 12
Forum Index > SC2 General |
Holgerius
Sweden16951 Posts
| ||
Lysanias
Netherlands8351 Posts
Oh well they did like this every year so perhaps we should get used to it. Ticket prices could be better diffided though, not saying it's not worth it just the structure seems kinda off. | ||
Nyvis
France284 Posts
DRG isn't "back". He barely won against an Mvp with more exploding wrists than ever before, barely won against HerO and Leenock is awfully overrated since his lategame is utter shite. Wtf did I just read? Leenock have the best infestor/broodlord control on earth, and proved it times and times, winning games with all odds against him (like 3 bases zerg vs 4 bases protoss) just by controlling his army better. | ||
Waxangel
United States32550 Posts
| ||
Olli
Austria24413 Posts
On December 28 2012 21:37 Elem wrote: What? Don't bring in sarcasm if you cannot even read anything I said, you utter tool. Great use of ad hominem but you did say Leenock is awfully overrated since his lategame is utter shit. Which is a completely fucking retarded thing to say, you utter tool. | ||
Elem
Sweden4717 Posts
On December 28 2012 21:43 Nyvis wrote: You're talking if 3 base zerg with BL infestor beating 4-5+ base protoss is something new and revolitionising. I do not understand what the world has come to if you call what he has "good lategame".Wtf did I just read? Leenock have the best infestor/broodlord control on earth, and proved it times and times, winning games with all odds against him (like 3 bases zerg vs 4 bases protoss) just by controlling his army better. On December 28 2012 21:48 DarkLordOlli wrote: Can you do anything but endlessly spout out small lines of sarcasm and repetition? I called you a tool because it is evident that you didn't even bother to read through my post but then began with your snarky comments which just makes you look silly.Great use of ad hominem but you did say Leenock is awfully overrated since his lategame is utter shit. Which is completely fucking retarded thing to say, you utter tool. | ||
Olli
Austria24413 Posts
On December 28 2012 21:54 Elem wrote: You're talking if 3 base zerg with BL infestor beating 4-5+ base protoss is something new and revolitionising. I do not understand what the world has come to if you call what he has "good lategame". Can you do anything but endlessly spout out small lines of sarcasm and repetition? I called you a tool because it is evident that you didn't even bother to read through my post but then began with your snarky comments which just makes you look silly. Lol, I read your whole post 3 times trying to find anything that possibly makes your statement about Leenock's lategame any less ridiculous than it is but I didn't. If you're just looking to insult somebody, I'd recommend people who actually deserve it. You might try a mirror. | ||
X3GoldDot
Malaysia3840 Posts
On December 28 2012 21:54 Elem wrote: You're talking if 3 base zerg with BL infestor beating 4-5+ base protoss is something new and revolitionising. I do not understand what the world has come to if you call what he has "good lategame". Can you do anything but endlessly spout out small lines of sarcasm and repetition? I called you a tool because it is evident that you didn't even bother to read through my post but then began with your snarky comments which just makes you look silly. sir, check your brains out, its quite apparent there are some errors in it. leenock has the best infestorbrood control BY FAR. while he might not have the best late game, his unit control of infestors is incredible, if you think otherwise you must be watching the wrong games because even as someone who doesnt like leenock, i acknowledge that he has incredible infestorbrood control and he is one of the only players capable of turning a game around incredibly just on his army control alone. | ||
Shinespark
Chile843 Posts
| ||
X3GoldDot
Malaysia3840 Posts
On December 28 2012 21:57 DarkLordOlli wrote: Lol, I read your whole post 3 times trying to find anything that possibly makes your statement about Leenock's lategame any less ridiculous than it is but I didn't. If you're just looking to insult somebody, I'd recommend people who actually deserve it. You might try a mirror. thats an incredible quote im going to use next time lol, also for the first time i agree with you...... i cant believe he thinks leenock isnt good | ||
X3GoldDot
Malaysia3840 Posts
On December 28 2012 21:31 sciserr wrote: It's a fucking shame that out-dated players like Grubby and HuK are prioritized over the likes of badasses like GLSnute (4-0 Symbol, 2-1 Life, 4-0 Grubby, 3-2 Stephano) and Acer.Nerchio/Scarlett Get it together GSL! they invite players willing to stay in korea for a season long, and since TL/EG is in proleague theyre players are willing to do so | ||
Schelim
Austria11525 Posts
On December 28 2012 21:31 sciserr wrote: It's a fucking shame that out-dated players like Grubby and HuK are prioritized over the likes of badasses like GLSnute (4-0 Symbol, 2-1 Life, 4-0 Grubby, 3-2 Stephano) and Acer.Nerchio/Scarlett Get it together GSL! not everybody they might want to invite will accept the invitation, for various reasons. also i realize you're Norwegian, and Snute was very impressive at HSC, but i don't know that one foreign tournament is enough of a justifaction for a GSL seed. if Snute gets a few more results like that, i'll consider him worthy. there's still another seed to go though, so maybe it will be one of the names you mentioned. and Grubby isn't out dated, he's looking better than he ever has in sc2. if anything he's not quite at the level for GSL just yet, i'll give you that. | ||
TheSir
1830 Posts
| ||
cbRRRR
Germany179 Posts
| ||
fightout
Singapore35 Posts
| ||
Nyvis
France284 Posts
On December 28 2012 22:03 Shinespark wrote: Why did Huk get a seed? Did he do well in something I missed? Code S seeds are rewards for doing well outside of GSL (Stephano ...). Code A seeds are more "try doing well here, if you don't, you'll be out quickly anyway" for people who aren't in the korean circuit for a while and won't compete in code A qualifiers. Like a trial by fire. We'll see if HuK survive it (staying in code A would be an big win, seeing how it's stacked now). | ||
TheBB
Switzerland5133 Posts
+ Show Spoiler [Group A] + Group A Flash Expected score: 2.90-2.10 (sets: 2.90-2.10) Probability of achieving top 2: 45.03% Most likely place: 1st (24.93%) Yonghwa Expected score: 2.68-2.32 (sets: 2.68-2.32) Probability of achieving top 2: 38.08% Most likely place: 1st (19.54%) MC Expected score: 2.67-2.33 (sets: 2.67-2.33) Probability of achieving top 2: 37.61% Most likely place: 1st (19.12%) Jaedong Expected score: 2.60-2.40 (sets: 2.60-2.40) Probability of achieving top 2: 35.95% Most likely place: 2nd (18.01%) Vampire Expected score: 2.18-2.82 (sets: 2.18-2.82) Probability of achieving top 2: 24.04% Most likely place: 6th (22.78%) YoDa Expected score: 1.97-3.03 (sets: 1.97-3.03) Probability of achieving top 2: 19.28% Most likely place: 6th (28.58%) details, data source, code + Show Spoiler [Details] + Detailed placement probabilities + Show Spoiler [Group B] + Group B Squirtle Expected score: 3.40-1.60 (sets: 3.40-1.60) Probability of achieving top 2: 61.00% Most likely place: 1st (37.57%) Trap Expected score: 2.98-2.02 (sets: 2.98-2.02) Probability of achieving top 2: 46.74% Most likely place: 1st (24.12%) TaeJa Expected score: 2.94-2.06 (sets: 2.94-2.06) Probability of achieving top 2: 43.39% Most likely place: 2nd (22.64%) Shine Expected score: 2.20-2.80 (sets: 2.20-2.80) Probability of achieving top 2: 22.73% Most likely place: 5th (20.68%) Happy Expected score: 1.71-3.29 (sets: 1.71-3.29) Probability of achieving top 2: 13.08% Most likely place: 6th (33.80%) Dream Expected score: 1.76-3.24 (sets: 1.76-3.24) Probability of achieving top 2: 13.07% Most likely place: 6th (30.22%) details, data source, code + Show Spoiler [Details] + Detailed placement probabilities + Show Spoiler [Group C] + Group C DongRaeGu Expected score: 3.72-1.28 (sets: 3.72-1.28) Probability of achieving top 2: 72.05% Most likely place: 1st (50.81%) Symbol Expected score: 2.95-2.05 (sets: 2.95-2.05) Probability of achieving top 2: 45.41% Most likely place: 2nd (25.98%) LosirA Expected score: 2.41-2.59 (sets: 2.41-2.59) Probability of achieving top 2: 28.17% Most likely place: 3rd (19.81%) First Expected score: 2.30-2.70 (sets: 2.30-2.70) Probability of achieving top 2: 25.38% Most likely place: 4th (19.82%) Bbyong Expected score: 1.91-3.09 (sets: 1.91-3.09) Probability of achieving top 2: 16.12% Most likely place: 6th (26.09%) Grubby Expected score: 1.70-3.30 (sets: 1.70-3.30) Probability of achieving top 2: 12.88% Most likely place: 6th (34.20%) details, data source, code + Show Spoiler [Details] + Detailed placement probabilities + Show Spoiler [Group D] + Group D Bomber Expected score: 3.66-1.34 (sets: 3.66-1.34) Probability of achieving top 2: 69.73% Most likely place: 1st (46.71%) HerO Expected score: 2.89-2.11 (sets: 2.89-2.11) Probability of achieving top 2: 43.04% Most likely place: 2nd (23.30%) ByuL Expected score: 2.59-2.41 (sets: 2.59-2.41) Probability of achieving top 2: 35.09% Most likely place: 2nd (19.05%) sOs Expected score: 2.17-2.83 (sets: 2.17-2.83) Probability of achieving top 2: 21.68% Most likely place: 5th (20.72%) Byun Expected score: 2.10-2.90 (sets: 2.10-2.90) Probability of achieving top 2: 20.32% Most likely place: 5th (22.62%) Genius Expected score: 1.60-3.40 (sets: 1.60-3.40) Probability of achieving top 2: 10.14% Most likely place: 6th (36.97%) details, data source, code + Show Spoiler [Details] + Detailed placement probabilities + Show Spoiler [Group E] + Group E finale Expected score: 2.93-2.07 (sets: 2.93-2.07) Probability of achieving top 2: 45.91% Most likely place: 1st (25.57%) NesTea Expected score: 2.92-2.08 (sets: 2.92-2.08) Probability of achieving top 2: 45.79% Most likely place: 1st (25.33%) HuK Expected score: 2.55-2.45 (sets: 2.55-2.45) Probability of achieving top 2: 33.50% Most likely place: 3rd (18.19%) FanTaSy Expected score: 2.38-2.62 (sets: 2.38-2.62) Probability of achieving top 2: 29.73% Most likely place: 5th (18.27%) Center Expected score: 2.27-2.73 (sets: 2.27-2.73) Probability of achieving top 2: 26.42% Most likely place: 6th (20.51%) Flying Expected score: 1.95-3.05 (sets: 1.95-3.05) Probability of achieving top 2: 18.66% Most likely place: 6th (28.97%) details, data source, code + Show Spoiler [Details] + Detailed placement probabilities | ||
nooboon
2602 Posts
On December 28 2012 22:32 Nyvis wrote: Code S seeds are rewards for doing well outside of GSL (Stephano ...). Code A seeds are more "try doing well here, if you don't, you'll be out quickly anyway" for people who aren't in the korean circuit for a while and won't compete in code A qualifiers. Like a trial by fire. We'll see if HuK survive it (staying in code A would be an big win, seeing how it's stacked now). Oh i thought this was code S groups. Since it's code A it's okay to have Huk and Grubby there as it's more of a test then anything. But yeah, it is a trial by fire as the skill level in Code A nowadays are just loaded with great players. Jaedong vs Flash group A o.o | ||
chesshaha
United States1117 Posts
I'm hyped for JD vs Flash! | ||
shabby
Norway6402 Posts
| ||
| ||