|
I dunno, man, the Silver Surfer would probably only beat Superman if he called on Galactus. They're both basically unbeatable demigods, lol. They can both time-travel, both can deconstruct matter to some extent, but the advantage of the Surfer has always been the Board and the incredible power that comes with it. It's his link to Galactus and there is no fucking way Superman could ever stand up to a god.
|
On August 25 2013 02:58 Assault_1 wrote:Show nested quote +On August 25 2013 01:53 Mafe wrote: I just hope they make very clear this isn't supposed to be the Nolan/Bale-Batman. For me as somebody who isnt't reading comics (I know for just about every thinkable meeting of superheroes, there is a comic where it happens, and similarly a comic where each hero turns villain and vice versa), this movie still seems to be shitting on just about about everything build by the dark-knight-trilogy: Making a batman who was made to be a "realistic" superhero meet an alien from outer space whose powers are so ridiculous you have to think "why doesn't he do X" each second every movie he's in? No thanks. At least that's what it looks like to me. The only thing I can think of that would wreck superman is dr manhatten from watchmen, he was basically god uhrm. . . Doomsday?
|
The saddest thing about all of this is that for the time and money spent taking Ben Affleck to coffee to cast him in the movie and fitting him for a batcodpiece, you could actually film a sequel to the extremely well executed Dredd film.
It's like a billion souls who like mediocre bullshit cried out and were rewarded.
(Edited for spelling mistake.)
|
On August 25 2013 07:39 Qwyn wrote: I dunno, man, the Silver Surfer would probably only beat Superman if he called on Galactus. They're both basically unbeatable demigods, lol. They can both time-travel, both can deconstruct matter to some extent, but the advantage of the Surfer has always been the Board and the incredible power that comes with it. It's his link to Galactus and there is no fucking way Superman could ever stand up to a god. I think you're confusing the movie and comics versions of the Silver Surfer. In the comics, his power does not come from his board.
There would be absolutely no need for the Surfer to call Galactus to utterly defeat Superman. His cosmic awareness would instantly let him know Superman's weaknesses, and he'd absorb Superman's solar energy before Supes could even move. He could also encase him in kryptonite, immerse him in red sun radiation, create a black hole inside his brain... the Surfer's simply way faster, more versatile (he's a matter & energy manipulator, Supes isn't) and more powerful than Superman.
|
On August 25 2013 08:10 kwizach wrote:Show nested quote +On August 25 2013 07:39 Qwyn wrote: I dunno, man, the Silver Surfer would probably only beat Superman if he called on Galactus. They're both basically unbeatable demigods, lol. They can both time-travel, both can deconstruct matter to some extent, but the advantage of the Surfer has always been the Board and the incredible power that comes with it. It's his link to Galactus and there is no fucking way Superman could ever stand up to a god. I think you're confusing the movie and comics versions of the Silver Surfer. In the comics, his power does not come from his board. There would be absolutely no need for the Surfer to call Galactus to utterly defeat Superman. His cosmic awareness would instantly let him know Superman's weaknesses, and he'd absorb Superman's solar energy before Supes could even move. He could also encase him in kryptonite, immerse him in red sun radiation, create a black hole inside his brain... the Surfer's simply way faster, more versatile (he's a matter & energy manipulator, Supes isn't) and more powerful than Superman.
Technically speaking, in the DC Universe, no one is harder than Lobo. End of story, bastich.
|
Northern Ireland20838 Posts
On August 25 2013 08:03 NSGrendel wrote: The saddest thing about all of this is that for the time and money spent taking Ben Affleck to coffee to cast him in the movie and fitting him for a batcodpiece, you could actually film a sequel to the extremely well executed Dredd film.
It's like a billion souls who like mediocre bullshit cried out and were rewarded.
(Edited for spelling mistake.)
It's such a shame, I hope the mooted sequel does occur. I enjoyed Dredd and really felt it was a good dip into the waters of the Dredd universe, and that the sequels would be more grand in scope. Sadly idiots didn't go to watch it
|
On August 25 2013 08:10 kwizach wrote:Show nested quote +On August 25 2013 07:39 Qwyn wrote: I dunno, man, the Silver Surfer would probably only beat Superman if he called on Galactus. They're both basically unbeatable demigods, lol. They can both time-travel, both can deconstruct matter to some extent, but the advantage of the Surfer has always been the Board and the incredible power that comes with it. It's his link to Galactus and there is no fucking way Superman could ever stand up to a god. I think you're confusing the movie and comics versions of the Silver Surfer. In the comics, his power does not come from his board. There would be absolutely no need for the Surfer to call Galactus to utterly defeat Superman. His cosmic awareness would instantly let him know Superman's weaknesses, and he'd absorb Superman's solar energy before Supes could even move. He could also encase him in kryptonite, immerse him in red sun radiation, create a black hole inside his brain... the Surfer's simply way faster, more versatile (he's a matter & energy manipulator, Supes isn't) and more powerful than Superman.
I know the power doesn't come from the board and it comes from Galactus, but the board is his aura and is how he is changed by the Power Cosmic to be an icon, no? At least that was how I understood it, that the aura changes each herald in a different way and he got the board.
I also thought that the ability to warp space and time and create black holes/manipulate the multi-verse directly only belonged to Galactus. Though yes I was thinking after the fact that the Surfer could just form Kryptonite lol.
|
Bale chose Moses over Batman... interesting...
|
On August 25 2013 07:19 kwizach wrote:Show nested quote +On August 25 2013 07:04 BenKen wrote:On August 25 2013 06:37 kwizach wrote:On August 25 2013 05:39 CubEdIn wrote:On August 25 2013 04:38 kwizach wrote:On August 25 2013 02:58 Assault_1 wrote:On August 25 2013 01:53 Mafe wrote: I just hope they make very clear this isn't supposed to be the Nolan/Bale-Batman. For me as somebody who isnt't reading comics (I know for just about every thinkable meeting of superheroes, there is a comic where it happens, and similarly a comic where each hero turns villain and vice versa), this movie still seems to be shitting on just about about everything build by the dark-knight-trilogy: Making a batman who was made to be a "realistic" superhero meet an alien from outer space whose powers are so ridiculous you have to think "why doesn't he do X" each second every movie he's in? No thanks. At least that's what it looks like to me. The only thing I can think of that would wreck superman is dr manhatten from watchmen, he was basically god There are plenty of comic characters that can beat Superman (which certainly does not mean Superman is weak). In terms of human-like characters, the Silver Surfer is a good example (he'd also convincingly beat Dr. Manhattan, whose actual feats are relatively scarce and who tends to be massively overrated - I'm not even sure he could actually beat Superman, given Superman's feats with regards to resistance to matter manipulation). I didn't read a lot of comic books and such, but technically, couldn't Dr.M simply make a wall of kryptonite around him? :D Well, how would he know about Superman's weakness to kryptonite? Contrary to the Silver Surfer, Dr. Manhattan does not possess cosmic awareness ,-) Been a while since I read Watchmen, but doesn't Manhattan experience all of time at once or something? That alone makes him way more godlike than either Supes or the Surfer. No, he has the possibility to see his own past and future, but he can't see the past and future of other people. He has shown the ability to modify the past from his own timeline, but when he did he "fractured reality" (something he had no control over) and had to go back to fix the changes. That's why he states himself that he is a slave to determinism. The Silver Surfer, meanwhile, has actual time travel feats (beyond his own timeline). I'm not sure post-Crisis Superman can time travel the way pre-Crisis Superman could, but I think he can still do it through speed. Yeah I think you're right. I Still think manhattan would smash superman. Dude can put himself back together after being taken apart at the atomic level. What's Kal-El gonna do against that?
|
On August 25 2013 10:08 BenKen wrote:Show nested quote +On August 25 2013 07:19 kwizach wrote:On August 25 2013 07:04 BenKen wrote:On August 25 2013 06:37 kwizach wrote:On August 25 2013 05:39 CubEdIn wrote:On August 25 2013 04:38 kwizach wrote:On August 25 2013 02:58 Assault_1 wrote:On August 25 2013 01:53 Mafe wrote: I just hope they make very clear this isn't supposed to be the Nolan/Bale-Batman. For me as somebody who isnt't reading comics (I know for just about every thinkable meeting of superheroes, there is a comic where it happens, and similarly a comic where each hero turns villain and vice versa), this movie still seems to be shitting on just about about everything build by the dark-knight-trilogy: Making a batman who was made to be a "realistic" superhero meet an alien from outer space whose powers are so ridiculous you have to think "why doesn't he do X" each second every movie he's in? No thanks. At least that's what it looks like to me. The only thing I can think of that would wreck superman is dr manhatten from watchmen, he was basically god There are plenty of comic characters that can beat Superman (which certainly does not mean Superman is weak). In terms of human-like characters, the Silver Surfer is a good example (he'd also convincingly beat Dr. Manhattan, whose actual feats are relatively scarce and who tends to be massively overrated - I'm not even sure he could actually beat Superman, given Superman's feats with regards to resistance to matter manipulation). I didn't read a lot of comic books and such, but technically, couldn't Dr.M simply make a wall of kryptonite around him? :D Well, how would he know about Superman's weakness to kryptonite? Contrary to the Silver Surfer, Dr. Manhattan does not possess cosmic awareness ,-) Been a while since I read Watchmen, but doesn't Manhattan experience all of time at once or something? That alone makes him way more godlike than either Supes or the Surfer. No, he has the possibility to see his own past and future, but he can't see the past and future of other people. He has shown the ability to modify the past from his own timeline, but when he did he "fractured reality" (something he had no control over) and had to go back to fix the changes. That's why he states himself that he is a slave to determinism. The Silver Surfer, meanwhile, has actual time travel feats (beyond his own timeline). I'm not sure post-Crisis Superman can time travel the way pre-Crisis Superman could, but I think he can still do it through speed. Yeah I think you're right. I Still think manhattan would smash superman. Dude can put himself back together after being taken apart at the atomic level. What's Kal-El gonna do against that? Obviously you havent read the comics. You just base your argument on the movies. It's a pretty even fight, and Dr. M is not necessarily stronger as Superman can manipulate matter in some level. Also, Fortress of Solitude.
|
On August 25 2013 09:47 Qwyn wrote:Show nested quote +On August 25 2013 08:10 kwizach wrote:On August 25 2013 07:39 Qwyn wrote: I dunno, man, the Silver Surfer would probably only beat Superman if he called on Galactus. They're both basically unbeatable demigods, lol. They can both time-travel, both can deconstruct matter to some extent, but the advantage of the Surfer has always been the Board and the incredible power that comes with it. It's his link to Galactus and there is no fucking way Superman could ever stand up to a god. I think you're confusing the movie and comics versions of the Silver Surfer. In the comics, his power does not come from his board. There would be absolutely no need for the Surfer to call Galactus to utterly defeat Superman. His cosmic awareness would instantly let him know Superman's weaknesses, and he'd absorb Superman's solar energy before Supes could even move. He could also encase him in kryptonite, immerse him in red sun radiation, create a black hole inside his brain... the Surfer's simply way faster, more versatile (he's a matter & energy manipulator, Supes isn't) and more powerful than Superman. I know the power doesn't come from the board and it comes from Galactus, but the board is his aura and is how he is changed by the Power Cosmic to be an icon, no? At least that was how I understood it, that the aura changes each herald in a different way and he got the board. I also thought that the ability to warp space and time and create black holes/manipulate the multi-verse directly only belonged to Galactus. Though yes I was thinking after the fact that the Surfer could just form Kryptonite lol. I'm not too sure of what you mean by "aura" - I've never come across the term with regards to Galactus heralds (or perhaps I don't remember it). The Silver Surfer without his board still has the same powers (in fact, it's been destroyed before and he simply remade it). You're right that his board is pretty much like a part of him, though. (btw, to clarify, Galactus gave him his powers, but if Galactus suddenly stopped existing it wouldn't affect the Surfer's powers at all)
On August 25 2013 10:08 BenKen wrote:Show nested quote +On August 25 2013 07:19 kwizach wrote:On August 25 2013 07:04 BenKen wrote:On August 25 2013 06:37 kwizach wrote:On August 25 2013 05:39 CubEdIn wrote:On August 25 2013 04:38 kwizach wrote:On August 25 2013 02:58 Assault_1 wrote:On August 25 2013 01:53 Mafe wrote: I just hope they make very clear this isn't supposed to be the Nolan/Bale-Batman. For me as somebody who isnt't reading comics (I know for just about every thinkable meeting of superheroes, there is a comic where it happens, and similarly a comic where each hero turns villain and vice versa), this movie still seems to be shitting on just about about everything build by the dark-knight-trilogy: Making a batman who was made to be a "realistic" superhero meet an alien from outer space whose powers are so ridiculous you have to think "why doesn't he do X" each second every movie he's in? No thanks. At least that's what it looks like to me. The only thing I can think of that would wreck superman is dr manhatten from watchmen, he was basically god There are plenty of comic characters that can beat Superman (which certainly does not mean Superman is weak). In terms of human-like characters, the Silver Surfer is a good example (he'd also convincingly beat Dr. Manhattan, whose actual feats are relatively scarce and who tends to be massively overrated - I'm not even sure he could actually beat Superman, given Superman's feats with regards to resistance to matter manipulation). I didn't read a lot of comic books and such, but technically, couldn't Dr.M simply make a wall of kryptonite around him? :D Well, how would he know about Superman's weakness to kryptonite? Contrary to the Silver Surfer, Dr. Manhattan does not possess cosmic awareness ,-) Been a while since I read Watchmen, but doesn't Manhattan experience all of time at once or something? That alone makes him way more godlike than either Supes or the Surfer. No, he has the possibility to see his own past and future, but he can't see the past and future of other people. He has shown the ability to modify the past from his own timeline, but when he did he "fractured reality" (something he had no control over) and had to go back to fix the changes. That's why he states himself that he is a slave to determinism. The Silver Surfer, meanwhile, has actual time travel feats (beyond his own timeline). I'm not sure post-Crisis Superman can time travel the way pre-Crisis Superman could, but I think he can still do it through speed. Yeah I think you're right. I Still think manhattan would smash superman. Dude can put himself back together after being taken apart at the atomic level. What's Kal-El gonna do against that? Yeah, I don't think Superman can do much to harm Dr. Manhattan (I must say I'm very far from an authority on Superman though :p), unless he gets prep time and can build a machine that would go beyond what Veidt built and actually do damage to him (or possibly send him to another dimension, or into a black hole - after all, in the comics, Superman has a genius-level intellect). I meant that the fight could possibly end in a stalemate.
|
I thought Bale was a great batman.
One of my friends suggested Michael Fasbender as Batman, which I find to be an intriguing idea.
No telling how amazing (or terrible) Ben Affleck will be until we actually see him. That's the nature of acting :D I hope they make him look old
On August 25 2013 01:53 Mafe wrote: I just hope they make very clear this isn't supposed to be the Nolan/Bale-Batman. For me as somebody who isnt't reading comics (I know for just about every thinkable meeting of superheroes, there is a comic where it happens, and similarly a comic where each hero turns villain and vice versa), this movie still seems to be shitting on just about about everything build by the dark-knight-trilogy: Making a batman who was made to be a "realistic" superhero meet an alien from outer space whose powers are so ridiculous you have to think "why doesn't he do X" each second every movie he's in? No thanks. At least that's what it looks like to me.
They will make it clear.
This marks a departure away from Nolan's trilogy, which I'm actually happy for. I absolutely love Nolan's take on Batman, but I also love the other dark-knight take on him, Frank Miller's, which features an older and grittier Batman who faces off against Superman... twice.
However, I hope Zack Snyder doesn't direct the movie... he has yet to impress me with anything
On August 25 2013 00:43 KaiserKieran wrote: I really enjoyed this past Batman trilogy and I was hoping for a few more movies starring some more batman villans. (There are so many different ones like Killer Croc [MY FAV], Mr. Freeze, Zsazz, ect...) The options are endless! I wish in the recent trilogy there was some more detective work in it but it was still great.
As for Superman his newest movie was kind of a let down and I have no idea what to expect for this new movie. It just seems kind of stuipid. Like I wanted to really like it especially since i really enjoyed the soundtrack but the entire first half of the movie just seemed boring.
Invincible Alien vs billionaire in a suit.
it just doesn't make much sense.
Nearly invincible.
You don't understand... the fun part about Batman vs Superman... is that Batman wins.
|
On August 25 2013 10:27 electronic voyeur wrote:Show nested quote +On August 25 2013 10:08 BenKen wrote:On August 25 2013 07:19 kwizach wrote:On August 25 2013 07:04 BenKen wrote:On August 25 2013 06:37 kwizach wrote:On August 25 2013 05:39 CubEdIn wrote:On August 25 2013 04:38 kwizach wrote:On August 25 2013 02:58 Assault_1 wrote:On August 25 2013 01:53 Mafe wrote: I just hope they make very clear this isn't supposed to be the Nolan/Bale-Batman. For me as somebody who isnt't reading comics (I know for just about every thinkable meeting of superheroes, there is a comic where it happens, and similarly a comic where each hero turns villain and vice versa), this movie still seems to be shitting on just about about everything build by the dark-knight-trilogy: Making a batman who was made to be a "realistic" superhero meet an alien from outer space whose powers are so ridiculous you have to think "why doesn't he do X" each second every movie he's in? No thanks. At least that's what it looks like to me. The only thing I can think of that would wreck superman is dr manhatten from watchmen, he was basically god There are plenty of comic characters that can beat Superman (which certainly does not mean Superman is weak). In terms of human-like characters, the Silver Surfer is a good example (he'd also convincingly beat Dr. Manhattan, whose actual feats are relatively scarce and who tends to be massively overrated - I'm not even sure he could actually beat Superman, given Superman's feats with regards to resistance to matter manipulation). I didn't read a lot of comic books and such, but technically, couldn't Dr.M simply make a wall of kryptonite around him? :D Well, how would he know about Superman's weakness to kryptonite? Contrary to the Silver Surfer, Dr. Manhattan does not possess cosmic awareness ,-) Been a while since I read Watchmen, but doesn't Manhattan experience all of time at once or something? That alone makes him way more godlike than either Supes or the Surfer. No, he has the possibility to see his own past and future, but he can't see the past and future of other people. He has shown the ability to modify the past from his own timeline, but when he did he "fractured reality" (something he had no control over) and had to go back to fix the changes. That's why he states himself that he is a slave to determinism. The Silver Surfer, meanwhile, has actual time travel feats (beyond his own timeline). I'm not sure post-Crisis Superman can time travel the way pre-Crisis Superman could, but I think he can still do it through speed. Yeah I think you're right. I Still think manhattan would smash superman. Dude can put himself back together after being taken apart at the atomic level. What's Kal-El gonna do against that? Obviously you havent read the comics. You just base your argument on the movies. It's a pretty even fight, and Dr. M is not necessarily stronger as Superman can manipulate matter in some level. Also, Fortress of Solitude. I'm willing to bet that I read Watchmen before you were able to read, kid. :-P Believe whatever you want, DR. M blinks and pulls apart the Kryptonian atom by atom, nothing Superman can do about that.
|
On August 25 2013 11:05 BenKen wrote:Show nested quote +On August 25 2013 10:27 electronic voyeur wrote:On August 25 2013 10:08 BenKen wrote:On August 25 2013 07:19 kwizach wrote:On August 25 2013 07:04 BenKen wrote:On August 25 2013 06:37 kwizach wrote:On August 25 2013 05:39 CubEdIn wrote:On August 25 2013 04:38 kwizach wrote:On August 25 2013 02:58 Assault_1 wrote:On August 25 2013 01:53 Mafe wrote: I just hope they make very clear this isn't supposed to be the Nolan/Bale-Batman. For me as somebody who isnt't reading comics (I know for just about every thinkable meeting of superheroes, there is a comic where it happens, and similarly a comic where each hero turns villain and vice versa), this movie still seems to be shitting on just about about everything build by the dark-knight-trilogy: Making a batman who was made to be a "realistic" superhero meet an alien from outer space whose powers are so ridiculous you have to think "why doesn't he do X" each second every movie he's in? No thanks. At least that's what it looks like to me. The only thing I can think of that would wreck superman is dr manhatten from watchmen, he was basically god There are plenty of comic characters that can beat Superman (which certainly does not mean Superman is weak). In terms of human-like characters, the Silver Surfer is a good example (he'd also convincingly beat Dr. Manhattan, whose actual feats are relatively scarce and who tends to be massively overrated - I'm not even sure he could actually beat Superman, given Superman's feats with regards to resistance to matter manipulation). I didn't read a lot of comic books and such, but technically, couldn't Dr.M simply make a wall of kryptonite around him? :D Well, how would he know about Superman's weakness to kryptonite? Contrary to the Silver Surfer, Dr. Manhattan does not possess cosmic awareness ,-) Been a while since I read Watchmen, but doesn't Manhattan experience all of time at once or something? That alone makes him way more godlike than either Supes or the Surfer. No, he has the possibility to see his own past and future, but he can't see the past and future of other people. He has shown the ability to modify the past from his own timeline, but when he did he "fractured reality" (something he had no control over) and had to go back to fix the changes. That's why he states himself that he is a slave to determinism. The Silver Surfer, meanwhile, has actual time travel feats (beyond his own timeline). I'm not sure post-Crisis Superman can time travel the way pre-Crisis Superman could, but I think he can still do it through speed. Yeah I think you're right. I Still think manhattan would smash superman. Dude can put himself back together after being taken apart at the atomic level. What's Kal-El gonna do against that? Obviously you havent read the comics. You just base your argument on the movies. It's a pretty even fight, and Dr. M is not necessarily stronger as Superman can manipulate matter in some level. Also, Fortress of Solitude. I'm willing to bet that I read Watchmen before you were able to read, kid. :-P Believe whatever you want, DR. M blinks and pulls apart the Kryptonian atom by atom, nothing Superman can do about that.
Depends on the superman. Superman Prime would be pretty much omnipotent, and also wields a GL ring.
|
On August 25 2013 11:05 BenKen wrote:Show nested quote +On August 25 2013 10:27 electronic voyeur wrote:On August 25 2013 10:08 BenKen wrote:On August 25 2013 07:19 kwizach wrote:On August 25 2013 07:04 BenKen wrote:On August 25 2013 06:37 kwizach wrote:On August 25 2013 05:39 CubEdIn wrote:On August 25 2013 04:38 kwizach wrote:On August 25 2013 02:58 Assault_1 wrote:On August 25 2013 01:53 Mafe wrote: I just hope they make very clear this isn't supposed to be the Nolan/Bale-Batman. For me as somebody who isnt't reading comics (I know for just about every thinkable meeting of superheroes, there is a comic where it happens, and similarly a comic where each hero turns villain and vice versa), this movie still seems to be shitting on just about about everything build by the dark-knight-trilogy: Making a batman who was made to be a "realistic" superhero meet an alien from outer space whose powers are so ridiculous you have to think "why doesn't he do X" each second every movie he's in? No thanks. At least that's what it looks like to me. The only thing I can think of that would wreck superman is dr manhatten from watchmen, he was basically god There are plenty of comic characters that can beat Superman (which certainly does not mean Superman is weak). In terms of human-like characters, the Silver Surfer is a good example (he'd also convincingly beat Dr. Manhattan, whose actual feats are relatively scarce and who tends to be massively overrated - I'm not even sure he could actually beat Superman, given Superman's feats with regards to resistance to matter manipulation). I didn't read a lot of comic books and such, but technically, couldn't Dr.M simply make a wall of kryptonite around him? :D Well, how would he know about Superman's weakness to kryptonite? Contrary to the Silver Surfer, Dr. Manhattan does not possess cosmic awareness ,-) Been a while since I read Watchmen, but doesn't Manhattan experience all of time at once or something? That alone makes him way more godlike than either Supes or the Surfer. No, he has the possibility to see his own past and future, but he can't see the past and future of other people. He has shown the ability to modify the past from his own timeline, but when he did he "fractured reality" (something he had no control over) and had to go back to fix the changes. That's why he states himself that he is a slave to determinism. The Silver Surfer, meanwhile, has actual time travel feats (beyond his own timeline). I'm not sure post-Crisis Superman can time travel the way pre-Crisis Superman could, but I think he can still do it through speed. Yeah I think you're right. I Still think manhattan would smash superman. Dude can put himself back together after being taken apart at the atomic level. What's Kal-El gonna do against that? Obviously you havent read the comics. You just base your argument on the movies. It's a pretty even fight, and Dr. M is not necessarily stronger as Superman can manipulate matter in some level. Also, Fortress of Solitude. I'm willing to bet that I read Watchmen before you were able to read, kid. :-P Believe whatever you want, DR. M blinks and pulls apart the Kryptonian atom by atom, nothing Superman can do about that. Well, Superman has resistance to matter manipulation feats. All Dr. Manhattan ever destroyed with his matter manipulation powers were a regular human and the top of a tank. That's why if you go by feats, you can't really call this imo.
|
On August 25 2013 10:53 TheRealPaciFist wrote:I thought Bale was a great batman. One of my friends suggested Michael Fasbender as Batman, which I find to be an intriguing idea. No telling how amazing (or terrible) Ben Affleck will be until we actually see him. That's the nature of acting :D I hope they make him look old Show nested quote +On August 25 2013 01:53 Mafe wrote: I just hope they make very clear this isn't supposed to be the Nolan/Bale-Batman. For me as somebody who isnt't reading comics (I know for just about every thinkable meeting of superheroes, there is a comic where it happens, and similarly a comic where each hero turns villain and vice versa), this movie still seems to be shitting on just about about everything build by the dark-knight-trilogy: Making a batman who was made to be a "realistic" superhero meet an alien from outer space whose powers are so ridiculous you have to think "why doesn't he do X" each second every movie he's in? No thanks. At least that's what it looks like to me. They will make it clear. This marks a departure away from Nolan's trilogy, which I'm actually happy for. I absolutely love Nolan's take on Batman, but I also love the other dark-knight take on him, Frank Miller's, which features an older and grittier Batman who faces off against Superman... twice. However, I hope Zack Snyder doesn't direct the movie... he has yet to impress me with anythingShow nested quote +On August 25 2013 00:43 KaiserKieran wrote: I really enjoyed this past Batman trilogy and I was hoping for a few more movies starring some more batman villans. (There are so many different ones like Killer Croc [MY FAV], Mr. Freeze, Zsazz, ect...) The options are endless! I wish in the recent trilogy there was some more detective work in it but it was still great.
As for Superman his newest movie was kind of a let down and I have no idea what to expect for this new movie. It just seems kind of stuipid. Like I wanted to really like it especially since i really enjoyed the soundtrack but the entire first half of the movie just seemed boring.
Invincible Alien vs billionaire in a suit.
it just doesn't make much sense. Nearly invincible. You don't understand... the fun part about Batman vs Superman... is that Batman wins. I actually hope they kick out David S Goyer. Snyder can do decent directing if he gets a good script. Goyer is just god awful. I just found out that he wrote the blade trilogy. Holy batman that is bad.
|
At least they didn't make a movie with the flash in it, that dude takes overpowered bullshit to the next level
|
On August 25 2013 12:21 Ettick wrote: At least they didn't make a movie with the flash in it, that dude takes overpowered bullshit to the next level to make the flash overpowered it takes an somewhat intelligent writer. i won't take that for granted
|
Northern Ireland20838 Posts
This super-power vs super-power hypothetical discussion kind of explains to me why I am not a big fan of Superman.
I'll just sit and hope the dystopian future lawman Judge Dredd makes a cinematic return soon. That or the Neuromancer adaptation sees the light of day.
Also, wtf, the Stallon Dredd made a 20 million dollar profit, the latest one lost round about the same (thus far). Oh this strange world we live in
|
It all depends on who the director is Batman vs Superman has plenty of comic book cred: dark knight returns by Frank Miller and others I cant recall if pulled off well it will be sick!
|
|
|
|