![](/mirror/smilies/smile.gif)
[WCS AM] Ro32 Group H Premier Season 3 2013 - Page 3
Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
Abominous
Croatia1625 Posts
![]() | ||
InvictusRage
United States230 Posts
On October 02 2013 07:18 Waise wrote: zerg hitting a timing is "one dimensional"? does that make 95% of pvz builds one dimensional too? ![]() I prefer to think of it as being a clean build; focused, with nothing wasted. : ) | ||
CyberVoid
Brazil165 Posts
| ||
DJHelium
Sweden13480 Posts
On October 02 2013 07:18 Waise wrote: zerg hitting a timing is "one dimensional"? does that make 95% of pvz builds one dimensional too? ![]() What does one dimensional mean in SC2-terms? Not really defined imo. But just massing two units and attack seems one dimensional to me, nothing too complicated. I would compare it to something like a 7 gate or blink stalker all in. | ||
BIRDKNIFE
United States73 Posts
| ||
FrostedMiniWheats
United States30730 Posts
^ninja | ||
Squat
Sweden7978 Posts
| ||
NPF
Canada1635 Posts
On October 02 2013 07:20 DJHelium wrote: What does one dimensional mean in SC2-terms? Not really defined imo. But just massing two units and attack seems one dimensional to me, nothing too complicated. I would compare it to something like a 7 gate or blink stalker all in. I view one dimensional in SC2 as only focusing on one aspect or component, basically if you focus all your intentions on one thing (aka no multitask or no teching\economy which is focusing on 2 things). | ||
IMLyte
Canada714 Posts
| ||
Squat
Sweden7978 Posts
| ||
Jacmert
Canada1709 Posts
On October 02 2013 07:22 IMLyte wrote: We Canadians need Scarlett and Huk to advance to the Global Finals. The CANADA, CANADA, CANADA Chant must be heard all over the Globe. But we're Canadian - we only get loudly patriotic when we're hosting the 2010 Vancouver Winter Olympics ![]() But I'm ok with chanting CANADA, CANADA, CANADA politely here in this live thread. | ||
NPF
Canada1635 Posts
On October 02 2013 07:22 IMLyte wrote: We Canadians need Scarlett and Huk to advance to the Global Finals. The CANADA, CANADA, CANADA Chant must be heard all over the Anything less, I will be sad | ||
DJHelium
Sweden13480 Posts
On October 02 2013 07:21 NPF wrote: I view one dimensional in SC2 as only focusing on one aspect or component, basically if you focus all your intentions on one thing (aka no multitask or no teching\economy which is focusing on 2 things). Sounds fair! Then that was one dimensional for sure, macro up and then go. My games often are half-four dimensional, with no clear game plan ![]() | ||
Undead1993
Germany17651 Posts
On October 02 2013 07:23 Squat wrote: Incontrol swore to sing the Canadian national anthem live on stream if Scarlett advanced today. trolololol yes pls during WCS eu! :D | ||
Jacmert
Canada1709 Posts
On October 02 2013 07:23 Squat wrote: Incontrol swore to sing the Canadian national anthem live on stream if Scarlett advanced today. He totally should! I love the Canadian & US national anthems. They're fun to sing. They're also so different (the US anthem is a [war] story; and the Canadian anthem mentions God, which is kinda ironic when you think that the US is supposed to be God's country ![]() | ||
![]()
Shellshock
United States97248 Posts
0:00 ![]() ![]() | ||
Waise
3165 Posts
On October 02 2013 07:21 NPF wrote: I view one dimensional in SC2 as only focusing on one aspect or component, basically if you focus all your intentions on one thing (aka no multitask or no teching\economy which is focusing on 2 things). but you do have to tech and saturate even in timing focused builds... you're just doing it for a shorter period of time? it's not like scarlett is leaning back in her chair and smoking a cigarette while playing because her ling hydra timing didn't "require focus" just semantics, i know, but it felt like classic caster overanalysis to me ![]() | ||
Squat
Sweden7978 Posts
| ||
Waise
3165 Posts
| ||
NPF
Canada1635 Posts
Will he do the french/english version or just the pure english one. Here the link if he needs it! Source Edit: @Waise, I've been known to overanalyze and miss the forest from a branch of a tree | ||
| ||