|
On February 08 2014 17:07 geript wrote: Actually, instead of answering that VE, tell me if you plan to approach Cora using the GERIPT IN THE GAME (tm) approach to Cora. That's the best option imo. I don't know what this means, but Cora is feeling fine to me for now. Inquisitive enough and active enough to not lynch for me.
|
11589 Posts
On February 08 2014 18:51 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On February 08 2014 18:40 yamato77 wrote: Was my post unclear? There's literally no good way to tell Slam's alignment early on. He's established that he will play incoherently as both alignments. Voting analysis is the best way to tell his intentions. I think voting analysis is going to be especially helpful in this setup in general. Plus I filtered you and looked for Alak instead of Slam. -.- Okay, you made me feels better for now. But to clarify, you would categorize everything Slam has done so far as trolling and non-alignment indicative? He said "this is going to be me this game" or something like that. It's "categorically indecipherable" Slam. Not "posts are in plain English" Slam.
His Cora vote was trolling, and the rest of it is incomprehensible Spamaslam.
|
|
11589 Posts
RE: Cora
Didn't care for this bit:
On February 08 2014 12:25 Corazon wrote:Show nested quote +On February 08 2014 11:59 VisceraEyes wrote:Well there is no "hook" for Alak to have to "get off" since he hasn't even been give a few hours. I think it is null for now Cora. It doesn't even feel scummy to you or you wouldn't be asking, you would be telling us. Alright, I will give it a break. I just thought the conversation about Geript was going nowhere, so I wanted to throw it out there. @Oats: 4 people in this game are scum. When I figure out who is scum, I'll let you know babycakes
Shoots down Oats for Oats' dumb "who is scum?" question, then
On February 08 2014 16:22 Corazon wrote: Geript, when do you plan on actually trying to find scum? Just curious.
Turns around and does the same stupid thing.
I, unlike you, give him no townie points for the Slam questions because it was a silly thing to ask anyway.
|
yamato, you were really good in the last nomination game if i remember correctly. I would say discussing townreads (or giving out townreads in general in a scale people usually do) helps mafia in the nomination phase, as they can more likely tell who would people vote for over who. Agreed?
|
11589 Posts
On February 08 2014 19:02 raynpelikoneet wrote: yamato, you were really good in the last nomination game if i remember correctly. I would say discussing townreads (or giving out townreads in general in a scale people usually do) helps mafia in the nomination phase, as they can more likely tell who would people vote for over who. Agreed? I said this last game and got yelled at for it, but yeah, I agree. Town should be quiet during the dawn about ANY reads, really.
|
Morning Rayn. I was just about to head to bed. Listing townreads as detrimental. That's interesting, I'd have to think about that. I'm not quite sure it makes a real difference either way as people don't usually 'pocket' scum reads. I should probably listen to that podcast again.
@VE it was about your plan on how to handle me from your QT with BH.
|
On February 08 2014 19:03 yamato77 wrote:Show nested quote +On February 08 2014 19:02 raynpelikoneet wrote: yamato, you were really good in the last nomination game if i remember correctly. I would say discussing townreads (or giving out townreads in general in a scale people usually do) helps mafia in the nomination phase, as they can more likely tell who would people vote for over who. Agreed? I said this last game and got yelled at for it, but yeah, I agree. Town should be quiet during the dawn about ANY reads, really. Fuck no. That's the question he's referring to. I remember this specifically from the podcast; I think you and Mocsta were all for it. It's dumb. That's another 24 hours we have to scumhunt and the nomination day is short. Fuck that plan and you're scummy for supporting it.
|
11589 Posts
On February 08 2014 19:10 geript wrote:Show nested quote +On February 08 2014 19:03 yamato77 wrote:On February 08 2014 19:02 raynpelikoneet wrote: yamato, you were really good in the last nomination game if i remember correctly. I would say discussing townreads (or giving out townreads in general in a scale people usually do) helps mafia in the nomination phase, as they can more likely tell who would people vote for over who. Agreed? I said this last game and got yelled at for it, but yeah, I agree. Town should be quiet during the dawn about ANY reads, really. Fuck no. That's the question he's referring to. I remember this specifically from the podcast; I think you and Mocsta were all for it. It's dumb. That's another 24 hours we have to scumhunt and the nomination day is short. Fuck that plan and you're scummy for supporting it. No, it's smart play. There's no reason to let scum have any more information about your reads after the flip. Nomination days are literally the least useful days for scumhunting anyway.
|
I was trying to say that telling "this dude is town" for no reason as people tend to do in other games is not as "useful" as it is in normal games.
VE and geript what's it exactly you think is wrong with yamato? I certainly do not argee with the inactvity comment, you might wanna elaborate on that geript.
|
On February 08 2014 19:12 yamato77 wrote:Show nested quote +On February 08 2014 19:10 geript wrote:On February 08 2014 19:03 yamato77 wrote:On February 08 2014 19:02 raynpelikoneet wrote: yamato, you were really good in the last nomination game if i remember correctly. I would say discussing townreads (or giving out townreads in general in a scale people usually do) helps mafia in the nomination phase, as they can more likely tell who would people vote for over who. Agreed? I said this last game and got yelled at for it, but yeah, I agree. Town should be quiet during the dawn about ANY reads, really. Fuck no. That's the question he's referring to. I remember this specifically from the podcast; I think you and Mocsta were all for it. It's dumb. That's another 24 hours we have to scumhunt and the nomination day is short. Fuck that plan and you're scummy for supporting it. No, it's smart play. There's no reason to let scum have any more information about your reads after the flip. Nomination days are literally the least useful days for scumhunting anyway. No... the plan was scum favored and scum helped push it. Ask VE.
|
11589 Posts
On February 08 2014 19:15 geript wrote:Show nested quote +On February 08 2014 19:12 yamato77 wrote:On February 08 2014 19:10 geript wrote:On February 08 2014 19:03 yamato77 wrote:On February 08 2014 19:02 raynpelikoneet wrote: yamato, you were really good in the last nomination game if i remember correctly. I would say discussing townreads (or giving out townreads in general in a scale people usually do) helps mafia in the nomination phase, as they can more likely tell who would people vote for over who. Agreed? I said this last game and got yelled at for it, but yeah, I agree. Town should be quiet during the dawn about ANY reads, really. Fuck no. That's the question he's referring to. I remember this specifically from the podcast; I think you and Mocsta were all for it. It's dumb. That's another 24 hours we have to scumhunt and the nomination day is short. Fuck that plan and you're scummy for supporting it. No, it's smart play. There's no reason to let scum have any more information about your reads after the flip. Nomination days are literally the least useful days for scumhunting anyway. No... the plan was scum favored and scum helped push it. Ask VE. Whatever dude.
|
On February 08 2014 18:53 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On February 08 2014 17:07 geript wrote: Actually, instead of answering that VE, tell me if you plan to approach Cora using the GERIPT IN THE GAME (tm) approach to Cora. That's the best option imo. I don't know what this means, but Cora is feeling fine to me for now. Inquisitive enough and active enough to not lynch for me. Do you think asking about Slam's vote or geript's scumhunting strategy counts as inquisitive?
|
On February 08 2014 19:12 raynpelikoneet wrote: VE and geript what's it exactly you think is wrong with yamato? I certainly do not argee with the inactvity comment, you might wanna elaborate on that geript. My perception of yam is as a pretty active/posty type player in the early game. So a quick fucking off has weird feels. I'll talk to you more in the morning, I'm struggle to stay awake.
|
yamato has already posted ~10posts less than he did in all GoT game on D1. Not to mention that game had a house election on N0 so there was a shitton more to talk about on D1. He has also posted more than in the whole Sicilian game (which had the posting limit so i don't even get why you bring that game up in the first place) so i would really like you to show me where you are basing this argument.
|
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 08 2014 18:51 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On February 08 2014 18:40 yamato77 wrote: Was my post unclear? There's literally no good way to tell Slam's alignment early on. He's established that he will play incoherently as both alignments. Voting analysis is the best way to tell his intentions. I think voting analysis is going to be especially helpful in this setup in general. Plus I filtered you and looked for Alak instead of Slam. -.- Okay, you made me feels better for now. But to clarify, you would categorize everything Slam has done so far as trolling and non-alignment indicative? Even given the massive amount of bussing that went on last Nomination?
|
Hey marv who'd you lynch now?
|
On February 08 2014 19:32 raynpelikoneet wrote: yamato has already posted ~10posts less than he did in all GoT game on D1. Not to mention that game had a house election on N0 so there was a shitton more to talk about on D1. He has also posted more than in the whole Sicilian game (which had the posting limit so i don't even get why you bring that game up in the first place) so i would really like you to show me where you are basing this argument. Looks like I was just misremembering. I only remembered this post: On February 08 2014 12:52 yamato77 wrote: Does anyone actually have anything useful to say or can I ignore this thread for ~24 hours? Thinking he popped in and then fucked off. Guess I'm going to have to start taking notes since reading and playing lol doesn't work
|
On February 08 2014 11:40 Corazon wrote: I'm curious as to why Slam threw a troll vote on me and then ran off. Do you guys think this is part of Slam's personality or a way to get him off the hook for inactivity early in the game? (I'm asking this because while I have a rough idea of Slam's playstyle, I don't know if these troll votes are what he does).
Phoneposting Catching this strikes me---wtf 'off the hook' like an hour into the game? And then VE being all smiley about it---VE why did YOU let Cora off the hook for this especially considering how easily he backed down from an obviously dumb comment
Something about this interaction man
|
On February 08 2014 15:23 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On February 08 2014 14:51 geript wrote: Oats you going to delurk. You just joined TS. sorry bro, just got home and ate lunch. You gonna be serious now? Oats seems concerned about Geripts vote on him but at the same time he's right that geripts play doesn't seem to be serious?
Trolly and yet interspersed with real (but not good) play Dunno
Risen totes town though Feels
|
|
|
|