https://streamable.com/ijv9
NHL '15-'16 - Mike Richards, possession superstar - Page 19
Forum Index > Sports |
Jinxed
United States6450 Posts
https://streamable.com/ijv9 | ||
Flaccid
8821 Posts
https://streamable.com/ijv9 | ||
Flaccid
8821 Posts
| ||
RenSC2
United States977 Posts
Good god did 44 misplay that one. If someone goes 1 vs 2, that weak side D should come over and take his head off, leaving the strong side D with cleanup duty. Instead he meekly poked at the puck and got walked while his partner expected help on the body, not the puck. Sure, it was a great play by McDavid, but a clear botch by the defense. | ||
QuanticHawk
United States32009 Posts
| ||
Orcasgt24
Canada3238 Posts
On February 03 2016 15:00 RenSC2 wrote: Good god did 44 misplay that one. If someone goes 1 vs 2, that weak side D should come over and take his head off, leaving the strong side D with cleanup duty. Instead he meekly poked at the puck and got walked while his partner expected help on the body, not the puck. Sure, it was a great play by McDavid, but a clear botch by the defense. 99% of high sex appeal goals are because defense fucked up in someway. Thats was so beautiful though. I think its absolutely hilarious people are talking Calder. He missed too much time and there is no reason to think Panarin, Larkin or Eichel will slow down. | ||
Jer99
Canada8157 Posts
| ||
sharkeyanti
United States1273 Posts
| ||
Flaccid
8821 Posts
| ||
QuanticHawk
United States32009 Posts
On February 03 2016 23:53 Jer99 wrote: The 1% is that ovi goal where he's lying back on the ice looking like he's a mobius strip and somehow dragfucks the puck into the net yup and dragfuck is a fantastic term, thank you for introducing it to me. even with the fuck up goddamn those handsssssss i wish there was a livefeed of flaccid watching that | ||
Flaccid
8821 Posts
| ||
QuanticHawk
United States32009 Posts
remember the better times mike you still got this under your belt | ||
Flaccid
8821 Posts
| ||
zev318
Canada4305 Posts
| ||
Jinxed
United States6450 Posts
| ||
Orcasgt24
Canada3238 Posts
On February 04 2016 07:33 Jinxed wrote: Deserved. Probably will be appealed, but that's just standard procedure. If he had gotten checked for a concussion or anything like that then maybe 10 would have been okay, but because he chose not to then it almost has to be 20. I think 20 is because of how much pressure the ref union put on the NHL. As the rules are written I think it was a 10 game offence | ||
QuanticHawk
United States32009 Posts
| ||
QuanticHawk
United States32009 Posts
I'd be really surprised if it was rescinded because he lit him up like you would a player in front of then net and the league and arbitrator probably aren't keen on setting thenprecedent that concussion basically means free for all | ||
| ||
QuanticHawk
United States32009 Posts
| ||
| ||