|
On February 11 2016 15:02 GargamelxD wrote: people voting ls eh
lynchbait will be lynch bait even behind a smurf
going to figure out his alignment This is kind of how I felt, but I do think the points against bhaal are valid.
Why do you think he is lynchbait?
|
he could be SL maybe, either that or ls
either way i think goldrom is VA and i want to kill him with fire
##Vote 77Goldrom
|
On February 11 2016 15:57 GargamelxD wrote: he could be SL maybe, either that or ls
either way i think goldrom is VA and i want to kill him with fire
##Vote 77Goldrom
|
On February 11 2016 16:32 saitamaofonepunch wrote:Show nested quote +On February 11 2016 15:57 GargamelxD wrote: he could be SL maybe, either that or ls
either way i think goldrom is VA and i want to kill him with fire
##Vote 77Goldrom
expand on gargamel and rom are bad and then this post
|
On February 11 2016 16:50 GargamelxD wrote:Show nested quote +On February 11 2016 16:32 saitamaofonepunch wrote:On February 11 2016 15:57 GargamelxD wrote: he could be SL maybe, either that or ls
either way i think goldrom is VA and i want to kill him with fire
##Vote 77Goldrom expand on gargamel and rom are bad and then this post Both of your types of lurking were meh
And then you voted the other lurker for a reason that came from the same wild blue sky as Boros
|
his vt claim is just as bad and unnecessary and the late to the party stuff is also suspicious, all the justification stands in contrast to what he says afterwards, regardless of his identity.
|
And Bhaals opinion of him doesnt make any sense (his opinion of me and not-opinion on rom). what he said about me he could say about rom and yet he thinks im more likely mafia.
so i guess after realizing that im willing to vote both, and its not LS
|
What makes people give unholy a free pass so far, at least compared to Gold, etc?
|
On February 11 2016 19:45 GargamelxD wrote: And Bhaals opinion of him doesnt make any sense (his opinion of me and not-opinion on rom). what he said about me he could say about rom and yet he thinks im more likely mafia.
so i guess after realizing that im willing to vote both, and its not LS
Actually what he said about you could also be said about unholy, not Gold
On February 11 2016 14:10 Bhaal LoM wrote:Like if any of the lurkers are scum prob is Gargame I didn't care for this post from him: Show nested quote +On February 10 2016 12:26 GargamelxD wrote: cant really take any posts seriously so far, no analysis possible becouse it still seems like standard banter He didn't try to analyze anything at all and he havne't posted anything since that post and it kind of worrisome. But his other content seems meh. Idk if it warrants a vote because sometimes townies are well lurkers.
On February 10 2016 19:51 unholyflare wrote: I don't make anything of the arguments that have gone on. I'll return later in case something interesting happened.
Bhaal, why be suspicious of Garga and not unholy when they basically made the same exact post (which made you find Garga suspicious)?
@Garga: Your focus right now is on the "relative" lurkers. What about the more active players? Is there some active scum running around we can't seem to notice?
|
i dont see any issues with unholy as he just postponed his actual play which i also did, and his entrance wasnt as awkward as roms. he actually took interest into what was happening and gave a bit of his opinion on smurf hunting.
in rom you have a guy who apologizes for being late, claims his role, asks about the latest news and in the next post acts like he doesnt care.
|
Okay just woke up.
On February 11 2016 21:41 keanuisgod wrote:Show nested quote +On February 11 2016 19:45 GargamelxD wrote: And Bhaals opinion of him doesnt make any sense (his opinion of me and not-opinion on rom). what he said about me he could say about rom and yet he thinks im more likely mafia.
so i guess after realizing that im willing to vote both, and its not LS Actually what he said about you could also be said about unholy, not Gold Show nested quote +On February 11 2016 14:10 Bhaal LoM wrote:Like if any of the lurkers are scum prob is Gargame I didn't care for this post from him: On February 10 2016 12:26 GargamelxD wrote: cant really take any posts seriously so far, no analysis possible becouse it still seems like standard banter He didn't try to analyze anything at all and he havne't posted anything since that post and it kind of worrisome. But his other content seems meh. Idk if it warrants a vote because sometimes townies are well lurkers. Show nested quote +On February 10 2016 19:51 unholyflare wrote: I don't make anything of the arguments that have gone on. I'll return later in case something interesting happened. Bhaal, why be suspicious of Garga and not unholy when they basically made the same exact post (which made you find Garga suspicious)? @Garga: Your focus right now is on the "relative" lurkers. What about the more active players? Is there some active scum running around we can't seem to notice? I will admit that prior to your post I didn't check unholyflare's filter probably NAI I guess.
|
Bhaal, And 77gold? You didn't check his filter either? Doesn't this quote from you imply that you compared all of the lurkers, garg(lurker that point in time), 77goldrom, and unholy?
Like if any of the lurkers are scum prob is Gargame
|
back and reading from page 8-9.
for saita's posts top of page 8 - not necessarily. and I also came to a different conclusion on nnn - he did smurfhunting but he's going about it with a purpose, and he made that clear. I'm reading filters and if I can tell you are using smurfhunting to actually advance the game for town, you're going to get a townread most likely. if you want to use other methods to do the same, that's fine too. scum don't necessarily need to blend in with the given conversation you mentioned either especially if it becomes obvious they are posting just to post when you are reading filters.
not taking a stance can be scummy - you could very well be hedging. and the posts in question were in the thick of conversation with nnn/warlock. that was the other thing I looked at before making that conclusion.
|
On February 11 2016 22:36 nnn_thekushmountains wrote:Bhaal, And 77gold? You didn't check his filter either? Doesn't this quote from you imply that you compared all of the lurkers, garg(lurker that point in time), 77goldrom, and unholy? I did check gold's filter and I thought his content was meh.
|
On February 11 2016 22:40 Bhaal LoM wrote:Show nested quote +On February 11 2016 22:36 nnn_thekushmountains wrote:Bhaal, And 77gold? You didn't check his filter either? Doesn't this quote from you imply that you compared all of the lurkers, garg(lurker that point in time), 77goldrom, and unholy? Like if any of the lurkers are scum prob is Gargame I did check gold's filter and I thought his content was meh.
Are you going to do stuff on your own, or do you want to be directed with questions?
|
On February 11 2016 22:46 nnn_thekushmountains wrote:Show nested quote +On February 11 2016 22:40 Bhaal LoM wrote:On February 11 2016 22:36 nnn_thekushmountains wrote:Bhaal, And 77gold? You didn't check his filter either? Doesn't this quote from you imply that you compared all of the lurkers, garg(lurker that point in time), 77goldrom, and unholy? Like if any of the lurkers are scum prob is Gargame I did check gold's filter and I thought his content was meh. Are you going to do stuff on your own, or do you want to be directed with questions? I more a person who needs direction I will be honest with that :\
|
On February 11 2016 22:49 Bhaal LoM wrote:Show nested quote +On February 11 2016 22:46 nnn_thekushmountains wrote:On February 11 2016 22:40 Bhaal LoM wrote:On February 11 2016 22:36 nnn_thekushmountains wrote:Bhaal, And 77gold? You didn't check his filter either? Doesn't this quote from you imply that you compared all of the lurkers, garg(lurker that point in time), 77goldrom, and unholy? Like if any of the lurkers are scum prob is Gargame I did check gold's filter and I thought his content was meh. Are you going to do stuff on your own, or do you want to be directed with questions? I more a person who needs direction I will be honest with that :\ Do you still want to lynch gargamel after his recent activity? Who do you want to lynch and why?
|
On February 11 2016 22:54 nnn_thekushmountains wrote:Show nested quote +On February 11 2016 22:49 Bhaal LoM wrote:On February 11 2016 22:46 nnn_thekushmountains wrote:On February 11 2016 22:40 Bhaal LoM wrote:On February 11 2016 22:36 nnn_thekushmountains wrote:Bhaal, And 77gold? You didn't check his filter either? Doesn't this quote from you imply that you compared all of the lurkers, garg(lurker that point in time), 77goldrom, and unholy? Like if any of the lurkers are scum prob is Gargame I did check gold's filter and I thought his content was meh. Are you going to do stuff on your own, or do you want to be directed with questions? I more a person who needs direction I will be honest with that :\ Do you still want to lynch gargamel after his recent activity? Who do you want to lynch and why? garg stuff from last night made him look better in my opinion. I don't want to lynch him atm unless something major comes up. On who to lynch: I don't know man to many lurkers >.< I normally hunt better when we got a lot of content(I was always a good late game player).
|
On February 11 2016 22:59 Bhaal LoM wrote:Show nested quote +On February 11 2016 22:54 nnn_thekushmountains wrote:On February 11 2016 22:49 Bhaal LoM wrote:On February 11 2016 22:46 nnn_thekushmountains wrote:On February 11 2016 22:40 Bhaal LoM wrote:On February 11 2016 22:36 nnn_thekushmountains wrote:Bhaal, And 77gold? You didn't check his filter either? Doesn't this quote from you imply that you compared all of the lurkers, garg(lurker that point in time), 77goldrom, and unholy? Like if any of the lurkers are scum prob is Gargame I did check gold's filter and I thought his content was meh. Are you going to do stuff on your own, or do you want to be directed with questions? I more a person who needs direction I will be honest with that :\ Do you still want to lynch gargamel after his recent activity? Who do you want to lynch and why? garg stuff from last night made him look better in my opinion. I don't want to lynch him atm unless something major comes up. On who to lynch: I don't know man to many lurkers >.< I normally hunt better when we got a lot of content(I was always a good late game player).
So why not join garg in voting 77goldrom? At the very least it would get rid of a lurker.
|
On February 11 2016 23:09 nnn_thekushmountains wrote:Show nested quote +On February 11 2016 22:59 Bhaal LoM wrote:On February 11 2016 22:54 nnn_thekushmountains wrote:On February 11 2016 22:49 Bhaal LoM wrote:On February 11 2016 22:46 nnn_thekushmountains wrote:On February 11 2016 22:40 Bhaal LoM wrote:On February 11 2016 22:36 nnn_thekushmountains wrote:Bhaal, And 77gold? You didn't check his filter either? Doesn't this quote from you imply that you compared all of the lurkers, garg(lurker that point in time), 77goldrom, and unholy? Like if any of the lurkers are scum prob is Gargame I did check gold's filter and I thought his content was meh. Are you going to do stuff on your own, or do you want to be directed with questions? I more a person who needs direction I will be honest with that :\ Do you still want to lynch gargamel after his recent activity? Who do you want to lynch and why? garg stuff from last night made him look better in my opinion. I don't want to lynch him atm unless something major comes up. On who to lynch: I don't know man to many lurkers >.< I normally hunt better when we got a lot of content(I was always a good late game player). So why not join garg in voting 77goldrom? At the very least it would get rid of a lurker. Because if he flips town then we got little to no info unless you talking about the people who voted for him. Also lurking is NAI for the most part anyways.
|
|
|
|