|
On June 14 2010 14:12 Diminotoor wrote:Show nested quote +On June 14 2010 13:15 danl9rm wrote: but i'd still rather have cheaters snuffed out 1000x more than LAN.
there's no point in being good at a game when cheaters run rampant. Hate to burst your bubble bro but hackers will find a way to implement hacks on SC2 within a very short period of time. The new Bnet2.0 only makes it more difficult. This won't even come close to touching the skill level of some of the most popular hack-makers out there who often times are far more intelligent than the programmers the company has working for them.
how did you get the secred IQ tests where this was proven?
by the way: I dont care if some people hack at all. they are having 100 times less fun than me
I also think that there never will be alot of hackers. because a) most people dont like it and b) if there are then its easyer to find out (finding popular hacks and making solutions against it is easyer).
so... just dont think too much about cheaters! theire not worth it.
|
even if blizzard doesnt implement lan someone somewhere is gonna find a way to hack it and enable lan anyway
|
"Blizzard staff will be present at tournaments to assist."
talk about securing profits by spending them.
|
On June 14 2010 14:24 waffling1 wrote:talk about securing profits by spending them. I think contacting some trusted people over at the venues would be a much better idea. For example, Chill would be the "associate" in Canada.
|
So just a few days ago the main complaint for anti-Blizzard people was that they're doing nothing to support esports at all. Now that theres a rumor they're giving special attention to esports like people wanted, all the anti-Blizzard people are back to the no LAN for themselves thing. Quite funny really.
I think if you just continue to voice your dissatisfaction Blizzard will eventually listen, but threatening to pirate stuff while trash talking Blizzard isn't very helpful at all. Blizzard isn't a company to ignore it's player base. If theres stuff they can improve on that isn't harmful to the game, their standards, or integrity, they will do it if enough people ask for it with good reason.
As for the rumor itself, I'm super excited! A major sponsor is back to support SC2 at launch with a major tournament! I think SC2 will definitely evolve over the next few years/expansions so it'll be fun to watch the pro gamers adapt. At the very least Blizzard is doing it's best to make the transition from BW to SC2 easy for the fans, assuming BW stops sooner rather than later.
|
On June 14 2010 14:36 lolaloc wrote:Show nested quote +On June 14 2010 14:24 waffling1 wrote:"Blizzard staff will be present at tournaments to assist." talk about securing profits by spending them. I think contacting some trusted people over at the venues would be a much better idea. For example, Chill would be the "associate" in Canada.
I think they want to get their own insights, so they know what their investing in. maybe they learn a few things there
|
sc2: lan edition
seriously blizzard?
|
you guys seriously thought you would play tournaments over Bnet? It was 100% clear that there will be something like LAN for tournaments.
|
Braavos36362 Posts
3. The first OS2L will have prelimnaries from all over the world, and then the players will be gathered in Seoul for the Ro16.
Now that is exciting.
|
On June 14 2010 14:12 Diminotoor wrote:Show nested quote +On June 14 2010 13:15 danl9rm wrote: but i'd still rather have cheaters snuffed out 1000x more than LAN.
there's no point in being good at a game when cheaters run rampant. Hate to burst your bubble bro but hackers will find a way to implement hacks on SC2 within a very short period of time. The new Bnet2.0 only makes it more difficult. This won't even come close to touching the skill level of some of the most popular hack-makers out there who often times are far more intelligent than the programmers the company has working for them.
Pretty much all hacks are client based : very easy to make and nearly impossible to prevents, nothing to do with the intelligence of the developers or hackers lmao.
|
On June 14 2010 14:55 Hot_Bid wrote:Show nested quote +3. The first OS2L will have prelimnaries from all over the world, and then the players will be gathered in Seoul for the Ro16. Now that is exciting. Yeah, I am excited what would the comments be if IdrA picked orb to be in his group.
|
OS2L? O SHI--
I came a little.
OK, I lied. A lot.
|
On June 14 2010 15:12 lolaloc wrote:Show nested quote +On June 14 2010 14:55 Hot_Bid wrote:3. The first OS2L will have prelimnaries from all over the world, and then the players will be gathered in Seoul for the Ro16. Now that is exciting. Yeah, I am excited what would the comments be if IdrA picked orb to be in his group. i imagine theyd only let people who qualify into the group selection
|
On June 14 2010 07:25 Inori wrote: This is hilarious. Instead of implementing a literally must-have features of a multi-player game, they are going to milk big money for the priviledge of using it. How greedy can you get.
Look. It isn't open distribution, its for tourney organizers only. How much do you think they're charging OSL for this? 100,000$?
lol. My guess is they just give it for a registration fee (to ensure its serious, and the prlly wont lose sleep over the money lol) for approved tournaments.
It doesn't even specify pricing, if any. Calm down kids.
btw guys:
If they were looking for shot term success, they wouldn't be investing into Esports. Its unlikely blizzard will see any serious profits from the sectors until after serious investment.
On June 14 2010 09:07 xtfftc wrote: If this turns out to be true, how would Activision expect us to believe that the reason behind not including LAN is that "that functionality's not there"? Nobody said this lol.
You guys realize that playing on iCCup is piracy just the same as this, right?
no isn't. Its only piracy if you don't own the game.
|
Oh Idra. Every single one of your post makes me laugh
|
pretty sure idra isn't a top 5 american player
|
On June 14 2010 15:27 Half wrote:Show nested quote +On June 14 2010 07:25 Inori wrote: This is hilarious. Instead of implementing a literally must-have features of a multi-player game, they are going to milk big money for the priviledge of using it. How greedy can you get. Look. It isn't open distribution, its for tourney organizers only. How much do you think they're charging OSL for this? 100,000$? lol. My guess is they just give it for a registration fee (to ensure its serious, and the prlly wont lose sleep over the money lol) for approved tournaments. It doesn't even specify pricing, if any. Calm down kids.
Well the armored truck service that drives the server around indiana has to get paid along with the private army that will guard the software with their life at LAN events.
|
Show nested quote + God, I hope they found a way to prevent this from getting leaked and Pirated...
This is impossible.
Skype Premium Edition. Or even WoW lol, private servers kind of suck. You can have pirated Starcraft 2 with everything broken and 300 ms.
|
On June 14 2010 15:17 IdrA wrote:Show nested quote +On June 14 2010 15:12 lolaloc wrote:On June 14 2010 14:55 Hot_Bid wrote:3. The first OS2L will have prelimnaries from all over the world, and then the players will be gathered in Seoul for the Ro16. Now that is exciting. Yeah, I am excited what would the comments be if IdrA picked orb to be in his group. i imagine theyd only let people who qualify into the group selection
ahahaa orbs a good guy, fun to watch, fun to listen to, but assuming he makes a worldwide star league is quite a stretch at this point lol
|
Roffles
Pitcairn19291 Posts
On June 14 2010 15:17 IdrA wrote:Show nested quote +On June 14 2010 15:12 lolaloc wrote:On June 14 2010 14:55 Hot_Bid wrote:3. The first OS2L will have prelimnaries from all over the world, and then the players will be gathered in Seoul for the Ro16. Now that is exciting. Yeah, I am excited what would the comments be if IdrA picked orb to be in his group. i imagine theyd only let people who qualify into the group selection Am I the only one who found this funny?
|
|
|
|