20 Years for a Youtube Prank? - Page 28
Forum Index > General Forum |
OSM.OneManArmy
United States509 Posts
| ||
Uldridge
Belgium4257 Posts
| ||
Acid~
Thailand442 Posts
| ||
Engore
United States1916 Posts
He probably won't get jail time at all. Probation, registered sex offender which will more or less ruin his life. I agree its dumb that 20 years is the max for a crime like this, infact its stupid that the police can even charge him but you also think that he does get his day in court. Edit: And listening to mainstream news in America is bad anyways. They only discuss bad things and scare the community so ya best to not ever put much thought to that kind of stuff. | ||
Subversion
South Africa3627 Posts
yes it was a stupid prank, but come on, 20 years? you shouldn't take away someone's whole life over this | ||
Mafs
Canada458 Posts
On April 14 2011 11:26 Wolf wrote: Found an update: http://hypervocal.com/news/2011/update-youtube-musician-evan-emory-sentenced-to-60-days-in-jail/ Thanks. I find it funny how someone can get a shorter murder sentence then someone can get a child molestation charge. Apparently killing people is better then molesting children according to the justice system. | ||
zTz
United States476 Posts
On April 14 2011 11:54 Mafs wrote: Thanks. I find it funny how someone can get a shorter murder sentence then someone can get a child molestation charge. Apparently killing people is better then molesting children according to the justice system. dont forget, marijuana also carries 25 to life sentances... go figure | ||
CursOr
United States6335 Posts
Naive parents LOVE to throw around terms like that when it comes to their kids. 5 years. 10 years. 20 years. All WAY too much. You're talking about ruining this guys life. I would say a token sentence of 6 months or less, classes, and some probation would be fine. I challenge anyone who thinks 20 years is legitimate sentence for this to even do 2 weeks in COUNTY jail. Let alone federal fucking prison. Man these people are stupid. This is why America has the highest incarceration rate in the world. Naive people throw around 5-10 year sentences and think its lenient. That is what makes me the most angry about this story. To state the obvious, yes he was wrong and should be made example of so others know its wrong- but lets not ruin a mans life. | ||
coolpants
United Kingdom29 Posts
| ||
Wolf
Korea (South)3289 Posts
| ||
Uldridge
Belgium4257 Posts
On April 14 2011 12:15 Wolf wrote: Interview about it: + Show Spoiler + http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P5Dsz2Sea48 LMAO, looking for predator stuff for something so innocent. God I hate paranoid parents. | ||
theBOOCH
United States832 Posts
| ||
fly
United States8 Posts
| ||
Ryuu314
United States12679 Posts
On April 14 2011 11:55 zTz wrote: dont forget, marijuana also carries 25 to life sentances... go figure Wait really? I'm pretty sure in California at least, if you're caught with weed you don't even have it go on your record... On April 14 2011 12:21 theBOOCH wrote: This is stupid, but 60 days isn't unreasonable either. It really depends on what the content of the video was, I guess. If it could have been used as child porn, that's o e thing, but if it's just a bunch of kids that look like theyre into some weird sex shit, that's a little different. Still, if I was a parent or a teacher, or even one of those kids ten years down the road, I would be pissed that someone played me like that. 60 days is a lot dude. Imagine if you had to go to jail for 2 months during school. You'd be so screwed...in all honestly I think they should just fine the kid, put him on probation, make him do community service, write ASSHOLE on his record and be done with it. | ||
Duoma
United States396 Posts
| ||
holdthephone
United States523 Posts
Though, all that had to be said was a simple, "hey could please take that off youtube?" seeing as the guy is obviously not a pedo and was just trying to be funny without fully thinking things through. I'm scared to become a parent myself, it seems all completely lose their sense of rationality at some point. | ||
Faze.
Canada285 Posts
Some rapists actually got away with less jail time than that. GG society, nice cheese. | ||
DragonDefonce
United States790 Posts
Also, if I watched it, does that make me guilty of watching child pornography? Get real.... | ||
thehitman
1105 Posts
Having said that I think the penalty is too harsh, he should be sentenced for 3-4 months for being a moron, but 20 years is as moronic as him pretending to sing sexual songs to children. | ||
Navillus
United States1188 Posts
On April 14 2011 11:57 cursor wrote: Anyone who has done time knows that 20 years is retarded. Even most people who haven't done time know this... Naive parents LOVE to throw around terms like that when it comes to their kids. 5 years. 10 years. 20 years. All WAY too much. You're talking about ruining this guys life. I would say a token sentence of 6 months or less, classes, and some probation would be fine. I challenge anyone who thinks 20 years is legitimate sentence for this to even do 2 weeks in COUNTY jail. Let alone federal fucking prison. Man these people are stupid. This is why America has the highest incarceration rate in the world. Naive people throw around 5-10 year sentences and think its lenient. That is what makes me the most angry about this story. To state the obvious, yes he was wrong and should be made example of so others know its wrong- but lets not ruin a mans life. I absolutely agree, except I don't think he should do any time in jail for this, also one of the worst things in our (I'm American) legal system is the sex offender system, two thirds of registered offenders are nonviolent meaning they got put there for something like an 18 year old having sex with a 16 year old (or something much less) and then they can be put on the list for life if not a very long time, and then their life is fucked. Seriously the number of restrictions people pile on to the sex offender system every time some bad thing happens because it makes legislators look "tough on crime" is ridiculous, they destroy the lives of the non-harmful people and make it so anyone involved with a sex crime won't have a shot at a second chance. | ||
| ||