|
On August 03 2011 11:13 Fatalize wrote:Show nested quote +On August 03 2011 11:11 MrCon wrote:On August 03 2011 11:09 Fatalize wrote:On August 03 2011 11:08 Zath.erin wrote:On August 03 2011 11:05 integrity wrote: i think it is funny that mass phoenix beats mass hydra.
hydra are so bad even against the units they are suppose to counter I don't think Hydra are meant to counter a unit that does extra damage vs light. You would have to be kind of dense to think that. In mass numbers you need something that is armored and hits air or else AoE. - Mutas are awful against archons / pheonix - Corruptors are awful against anything So what do you do ? Mass fungal ? just snipe infestors and you're fine. Corruptors are awful against everything bu phoenix, and the point is how to counter phoenixes. Corruptors also allow guardians which rape the ground army that kiwi had. Corruptors take supply for nothing. You get rid of the phoenix but you have 40 supply of useless corruptors. Exact same problem as the protoss collossus deathball basically. Corruptor is the worst unit of the game, even blizzard game designer said that it's bad.
That is an idiotic way of thinking about it. You cancel out like 20 Phoenixes, that is no small investment and Chargelot Archon WITHOUT Phoenix is weaker than with Phoenix and is MUCH easier to deal with just with a regular Roach army
|
really like demus marine favor in his recent matches
|
Demuslim really likes his marines.
|
On August 03 2011 11:15 Crazypyro1 wrote:Show nested quote +On August 03 2011 11:13 bennyaus wrote:On August 03 2011 11:11 MrCon wrote:On August 03 2011 11:09 Fatalize wrote:On August 03 2011 11:08 Zath.erin wrote:On August 03 2011 11:05 integrity wrote: i think it is funny that mass phoenix beats mass hydra.
hydra are so bad even against the units they are suppose to counter I don't think Hydra are meant to counter a unit that does extra damage vs light. You would have to be kind of dense to think that. In mass numbers you need something that is armored and hits air or else AoE. - Mutas are awful against archons / pheonix - Corruptors are awful against anything So what do you do ? Mass fungal ? just snipe infestors and you're fine. Corruptors are awful against everything bu phoenix, and the point is how to counter phoenixes. Corruptors also allow guardians which rape the ground army that kiwi had. Corrupters are awful against everything? What game do you play. They are amazing vs Phoenix/Carriers (in small numbers)/Vikings/Battlecruisers. This reminds me of an earlier SOTG where Painuser was saying how good Zealots were and Inc/Tyler argued against him saying they're worthless. Lo and behold, Chargelots are like the central unit of the PvT metagame right now. People need to try these things before saying they're worthless. He meant corrupters are awful against everything else in the PvZ matchup. No one uses carriers and as soon as the phoenixes die, you realize you have 40 food sitting around in the air while you get raped by archon/zealot.
You realise that you have killed 40 food of his army though? and that 40 food can turn into Broodlords which hard counter Zealot/Archon.
|
But PainUser, Blue flame hellions are not that good~~~!!
|
Kiwi's push the second demu moved out and salvaged bunkers, what horrible coincidence
|
I want that.
The now standard ghost openings should have prevented a complete face smash engagement.
|
=( chargelot timing attack
|
Canada2485 Posts
|
Thanks Kiwikaki, I know what to do in PvT now
|
|
Did anyone actually think Demuslim could beat Kiwikaki ?_?
|
|
lol Nice pick EG. nice pick..
|
Kiwi, hide yo builds, hide yo strats and hide you tactics cuz I be stealin all of dat k?
Seriously. His PvZ was fucking MANLY.
|
Methinks EG needs to rethink its roster.
|
On August 03 2011 11:15 SafeAsCheese wrote: But PainUser, Blue flame hellions are not that good~~~!!
You don't know anything about this game then
|
On August 03 2011 11:16 shawster wrote: who saw that coming lol
A lot of people?
|
EG never really had a chance :/
|
GG Spades and Reign. Disappointing showing by EG.
|
|
|
|