GSL Super Tournament #2 (2018) bracket released - Page 2
Forum Index > SC2 General |
FrostedMiniWheats
United States30730 Posts
| ||
Elentos
55454 Posts
| ||
Fango
United Kingdom8808 Posts
Also there's no way Rogue or Maru would deny sOs a blizzcon spot right? I really think this comes down to soO vs sOs for it. | ||
Cricketer12
United States13835 Posts
On September 19 2018 21:46 Fango wrote: If soO goes through Bunny, Dark, and Classic, he can make the finals. Then poviding sOs doesn't make said final, soO will get the spot. Also there's no way Rogue or Maru would deny sOs a blizzcon spot right? I really think this comes down to soO vs sOs for it. There is. What you suggest is basically match-fixing, the ultimate crime in sports. | ||
Clazziquai10
Singapore1949 Posts
| ||
Charoisaur
Germany15616 Posts
On September 19 2018 23:48 Cricketer12 wrote: There is. What you suggest is basically match-fixing, the ultimate crime in sports. which obviously no Starcraft player would ever do | ||
Fango
United Kingdom8808 Posts
On September 19 2018 23:48 Cricketer12 wrote: There is. What you suggest is basically match-fixing, the ultimate crime in sports. Throwing for money = matchfixing. Choosing to not play at 100% or doing intentionally inferior strategies is not against the rules. | ||
Tempest
United States147 Posts
Bunny magically wins both of his TvZ matchups so that Classic can make it to grand finals without playing a PvZ. After which he will lose to Maru/Rogue or defeat Stats. Long shot I know, but im sticking to it. | ||
ZigguratOfUr
Iraq16955 Posts
On September 19 2018 23:57 Fango wrote: Throwing for money = matchfixing. Choosing to not play at 100% or doing intentionally inferior strategies is not against the rules. Not at all. It's matchfixing regardless of whether you're playing poorly to help a teammate or to get an easier playoff opponent or any other reason. It's definitely against the rules. That being said the community doesn't consider this form of matchfixing that harshly, it's hard to prove, and people haven't ever been punished even in cases where it's blatantly obvious (Stork for example threw like 4 tiebreak games at WCG to try to avoid another Korean in the playoffs). | ||
deacon.frost
Czech Republic12116 Posts
On September 19 2018 23:48 Cricketer12 wrote: There is. What you suggest is basically match-fixing, the ultimate crime in sports. Team strategy is match fixing? Is match fixing when Maru swaps people around so his team mates have easier groups(or at least think so )? It all comes down what the team strategy is and how the rest of the games happens. But in the end - it's inside the team. Unless somebody from the team would talk nobody will know. Look at Life, nobody knew he was match fixing ;-) | ||
Fango
United Kingdom8808 Posts
On September 20 2018 00:11 ZigguratOfUr wrote: Not at all. It's matchfixing regardless of whether you're playing poorly to help a teammate or to get an easier playoff opponent or any other reason. It's definitely against the rules. That being said the community doesn't consider this form of matchfixing that harshly, it's hard to prove, and people haven't ever been punished even in cases where it's blatantly obvious (Stork for example threw like 4 tiebreak games at WCG to try to avoid another Korean in the playoffs). Choosing to do an inferior build isn't matchfixing. Usually they'll still try to win the game, they're just less likely to. Some players have said they value entertaining over winning and do this often. And in round robin groups once players are already guaranteed to win the group, they'll sometimes do stupid builds. It's not fixing unless they intentionally arrange to lose the game. And even if they did it's impossible to prove usually. | ||
Poopi
France12467 Posts
Would not be match fix. | ||
swissman777
1106 Posts
| ||
swissman777
1106 Posts
On September 20 2018 00:24 Fango wrote: Choosing to do an inferior build isn't matchfixing. Usually they'll still try to win the game, they're just less likely to. Some players have said they value entertaining over winning and do this often. And in round robin groups once players are already guaranteed to win the group, they'll sometimes do stupid builds. It's not fixing unless they intentionally arrange to lose the game. And even if they did it's impossible to prove usually. It's also intentionally losing the game to obtain money or some sort of return. I think you can intentionally lose and proving that by itself is not enough | ||
FrostedMiniWheats
United States30730 Posts
On September 20 2018 00:40 swissman777 wrote: Damn, what's up with the best jin air players and their brackets? sOs better play the games of his life to beat maru/rogue Maru sucks in these and after Rogue's series against Neeb I'm not so sure in Rogue's ZvP anymore. Think sOs is gonna be fine. | ||
fishjie
United States1519 Posts
go soo!!!!!!!!! | ||
Fango
United Kingdom8808 Posts
On September 20 2018 00:40 swissman777 wrote: Damn, what's up with the best jin air players and their brackets? sOs better play the games of his life to beat maru/rogue Maru and Rogue never normally go 100% in events like this. Whereas sOs has a very good reason to. | ||
Nakajin
Canada8773 Posts
Trap got a shitty draw. | ||
Elentos
55454 Posts
On September 20 2018 00:00 Tempest wrote: Bold prediction of the week: Bunny magically wins both of his TvZ matchups so that Classic can make it to grand finals without playing a PvZ. After which he will lose to Maru/Rogue or defeat Stats. Long shot I know, but im sticking to it. First Classic is gonna have to survive getting proxied every game. | ||
Tempest
United States147 Posts
On September 20 2018 01:22 Elentos wrote: First Classic is gonna have to survive getting proxied every game. I have a mildly biased opinion that Classic's PvT is the best PvT in the world. I also feel that Maru is the main threat with and best user of said proxy playstyle, and that's why I predict Classic to go down to Maru if he faces him in the finals. TY is no slouch though, and if he has adopted Proxy as his bread and butter go-to for every game now, you may be right. | ||
| ||