How is this still happening? For the 4th time in a month all my fucking settings have been reset. It even opened the goddamn game in smaller-than-my-resolution window. What the fuck. So annoying.
- SD graphics look WAY WORST than original SC graphics. The blur effect doesn't improvie it by an inch. - SD graphics look WAY WORST than original SC graphics. The blur effect doesn't improvie it by an inch. - SD graphics look WAY WORST than original SC graphics. The blur effect doesn't improvie it by an inch. ///////// sori did i say it two times extra?
On April 02 2018 13:52 -visnu- wrote: - SD graphics look WAY WORST than original SC graphics. The blur effect doesn't improvie it by an inch. - SD graphics look WAY WORST than original SC graphics. The blur effect doesn't improvie it by an inch. - SD graphics look WAY WORST than original SC graphics. The blur effect doesn't improvie it by an inch. ///////// sori did i say it two times extra?
- SD graphics look WAY WORST than original SC graphics. The blur effect doesn't improvie it by an inch. - SD graphics look WAY WORST than original SC graphics. The blur effect doesn't improvie it by an inch. - SD graphics look WAY WORST than original SC graphics. The blur effect doesn't improvie it by an inch.
I will say it three times too
Why does it look worse? Maybe because they want to incline people to buy remastered... i don't know. No idea.
On April 02 2018 13:52 -visnu- wrote: - SD graphics look WAY WORST than original SC graphics. The blur effect doesn't improvie it by an inch. - SD graphics look WAY WORST than original SC graphics. The blur effect doesn't improvie it by an inch. - SD graphics look WAY WORST than original SC graphics. The blur effect doesn't improvie it by an inch. ///////// sori did i say it two times extra?
- SD graphics look WAY WORST than original SC graphics. The blur effect doesn't improvie it by an inch. - SD graphics look WAY WORST than original SC graphics. The blur effect doesn't improvie it by an inch. - SD graphics look WAY WORST than original SC graphics. The blur effect doesn't improvie it by an inch.
I will say it three times too
Why does it look worse? Maybe because they want to incline people to buy remastered... i don't know. No idea.
Can you guys give some good printscreens on how SC looked / should look like vs current situation?
I have provided feedback based on these three snapshots:
– that is optimal, how it was on old OS.. – that is how it was on on new OS with chaos luncher etc. – this is how it looks now.
im not sure what a flying drone bug is but i can tell u that drone cant fly,it was a weird bug on 1.16 aswell but is only about the shadow.
It's a rare bug where you can move a drone over cliffs and obstacle. I dunno from the top of my head how it works, but its not the same as drone bug, where the drone has no shadow.
On April 02 2018 13:52 -visnu- wrote: - SD graphics look WAY WORST than original SC graphics. The blur effect doesn't improvie it by an inch. - SD graphics look WAY WORST than original SC graphics. The blur effect doesn't improvie it by an inch. - SD graphics look WAY WORST than original SC graphics. The blur effect doesn't improvie it by an inch. ///////// sori did i say it two times extra?
- SD graphics look WAY WORST than original SC graphics. The blur effect doesn't improvie it by an inch. - SD graphics look WAY WORST than original SC graphics. The blur effect doesn't improvie it by an inch. - SD graphics look WAY WORST than original SC graphics. The blur effect doesn't improvie it by an inch.
I will say it three times too
Why does it look worse? Maybe because they want to incline people to buy remastered... i don't know. No idea.
Can you guys give some good printscreens on how SC looked / should look like vs current situation?
I have provided feedback based on these three snapshots:
Doesnt really work like that, 1080p makes it look better again. Every "Picture" has to be posted in the same quali. You would have to search with a magnifying glass anyway to find the difference
if you click on these and then download the source image, open it and zoom in on it, you can see the illustration of the lowered quality in RM SD display because of pixel interpolation (since it won't display the original graphics at the correct resolution, 1 pixel for 1 pixel or maybe 4 pixels for 1 pixel etc) if you look at health bars too you can see it clear, in health bars each square of life is not of equal width to the others in RM SD on sharpest setting (no filters) the improper position of pixel is directly visible, then on less sharp (2/4 filetered) it is closest to ogirinal with this amount of error as above (everything is slightly messed and blurred by interpolation), and then on 3/4 filtered more interpolation is added so that it is blurry and then 4/4 very blurry basically to display it clean you'd need original resolution or x2 resolution etc, so the settings in the game to make this possible are missing note that the text on RM bnet chat for example also is not displayed on the correct resolution apparently resulting in blurred text/uneven letters
PS: I got 1.16 back from Iccup for this. Amazing how slick software it is, it launches very fast and the menus respond instant! Then I launched Remastered, it took me over 5 minutes to start it xD blizz launcher force launched itself and wanted to update itself, stuck on loading of main menu and etc. And then when its fully loaded its still much slower in so many places.
Observers shouldn't lag games. If observing was actually a buffered replay viewer of the live game it would not lag for players, allow replay of previous highlights (using the existing fast forward/rewind capability), and expand beyond 4 additional slots to any number of slots. Add option to allow obs to chat with players. Solo obs is isolating Kill counter for buildings Kill counts for nukes to the nuking ghost Map editor improvements to allow any number of stackable cliffs and other features limited by old framework. Fixed location maps for team play similar to sc2 A complete overhaul of the map editor
On April 02 2018 13:52 -visnu- wrote: - SD graphics look WAY WORST than original SC graphics. The blur effect doesn't improvie it by an inch. - SD graphics look WAY WORST than original SC graphics. The blur effect doesn't improvie it by an inch. - SD graphics look WAY WORST than original SC graphics. The blur effect doesn't improvie it by an inch. ///////// sori did i say it two times extra?
- SD graphics look WAY WORST than original SC graphics. The blur effect doesn't improvie it by an inch. - SD graphics look WAY WORST than original SC graphics. The blur effect doesn't improvie it by an inch. - SD graphics look WAY WORST than original SC graphics. The blur effect doesn't improvie it by an inch.
I will say it three times too
Why does it look worse? Maybe because they want to incline people to buy remastered... i don't know. No idea.
Can you guys give some good printscreens on how SC looked / should look like vs current situation?
I have provided feedback based on these three snapshots:
You can already see right of the bat how pixely the scvs are compared to 1.16 scvs and if you turn up thr SD filter it removes the pixely look but then it becomes way blurrier than it was in 1.16. So it's either more pixely or more blurry than 1.16, and none of those looks in anyway better.
On April 02 2018 13:52 -visnu- wrote: - SD graphics look WAY WORST than original SC graphics. The blur effect doesn't improvie it by an inch. - SD graphics look WAY WORST than original SC graphics. The blur effect doesn't improvie it by an inch. - SD graphics look WAY WORST than original SC graphics. The blur effect doesn't improvie it by an inch. ///////// sori did i say it two times extra?
- SD graphics look WAY WORST than original SC graphics. The blur effect doesn't improvie it by an inch. - SD graphics look WAY WORST than original SC graphics. The blur effect doesn't improvie it by an inch. - SD graphics look WAY WORST than original SC graphics. The blur effect doesn't improvie it by an inch.
I will say it three times too
Why does it look worse? Maybe because they want to incline people to buy remastered... i don't know. No idea.
Can you guys give some good printscreens on how SC looked / should look like vs current situation?
I have provided feedback based on these three snapshots:
You can already see right of the bat how pixely the scvs are compared to 1.16 scvs and if you turn up thr SD filter it removes the pixely look but then it becomes way blurrier than it was in 1.16. So it's either more pixely or more blurry than 1.16, and none of those looks in anyway better.