On February 17 2006 00:40 Chibi[OWNS] wrote:
funny how you make a topic then ban the main person who would have contributed to it
funny how you make a topic then ban the main person who would have contributed to it
contribute like this?
Forum Index > Closed |
BroOd
Austin10831 Posts
On February 17 2006 00:40 Chibi[OWNS] wrote: funny how you make a topic then ban the main person who would have contributed to it contribute like this? | ||
MoltkeWarding
5195 Posts
| ||
jacen
Austria3644 Posts
the moment he starts specific hatethreads against moderators hes down the drain for me. | ||
Mynock
4492 Posts
On February 17 2006 00:14 MoltkeWarding wrote: Show nested quote + On February 16 2006 23:59 HnR)Insane wrote: That's because people like FakeSteve come off as entertaining, whereas people who constantly talk about standards of behaviour, the converted, and how liking more liberal people is bad end up coming off as pompous asses. Edit: not directed at mods btw, I mostly agree with what Twisted said, moderation-wise. True. Although being a pompous ass is only a fault when one has nothing to be pompous about. In all other cases pompousness is honesty. Seriously though, I'd be interested to hear about fakesteve's entertainment value. It's about as entertaining as the dialogue of an average b.net spam channel. Nothing personal against fakesteve. I see this will eventually come down to Steve's paint threads and then one could use Hot Bid's checklist with a checked "Get a blog ffs!" line or something along those lines... But thing is, a lot of people on these forums like Steve's style... or something... and the way his insults are promoted, and all of that is undebatable. What is debatable tho is how low a form of entertainment that presents. My stance on this is obvious. -Mynock | ||
Mynock
4492 Posts
Since the characters are often so charming, I wonder if characters would, in different situations, have fallen in love with each other. I will start by saying that - Anne Elliot is the only woman who appears to meet Darcy's (rather high) standards of what a truly accomplished woman should be. I don't think he would have be violently in love with her, but he might have admired her. Her family (though embarrasing) was near his level. He might have let himself fall in love. And perhaps they could have been happy together. But only if there was no prospect of Frederick Wentworth. Amusing college paper anyone? http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=35406 At first, Laurie couldn't decide which kind of tea she wanted. The camomile, which used to be her favorite for lazy evenings at home, now reminded her too much of Carl, who once said, in happier times, that he liked camomile. But she felt she must now, at all costs, keep her mind off Carl. His possessiveness was suffocating, and if she thought about him too much her asthma started acting up again. So camomile was out of the question. -Mynock | ||
a-game
Canada5085 Posts
On February 16 2006 15:17 Liquid`Drone wrote: no our job is to moderate the forums, not to elevate ourselves to a level where we're allowed to post in a different manner from everyone else. the best way to show what is proper behaviour is to behave properly. it's not about it being a democracy, it's about being consistent. i'm more in favour of drone's style of moderation | ||
Pistasj
Norway272 Posts
It got me thinking. I don't see why threads have to be closed if they don't break the rules. Would they not dissappear by themselves when they loose interest? I'm just speaking generally because I have seen this in many forums. A mod comes in and decides a thread needs to be closed because he does not find it interesting. About tl.net I think the mods are great. Only thing is I want to point out is that there are alot of racist comments. I think that kinda stuff can scare some people away. So maybe give a warnig to people doing it if it's not already done. | ||
CuddlyCuteKitten
Sweden2355 Posts
That includes the mods, and the rules. Nothing should be cut in stone and I really loved the arbitrary judgments when rekrul still put the fear of god into the hearts of the newbies. So PLEASE don't start over moderating the site to much, I have other communities for that. (Perhaps ban more idiots in the strategy section though.) | ||
mrmin123
Korea (South)2971 Posts
On February 17 2006 00:27 shasin wrote: ... we're all adults here ... If only that were true. | ||
PockyPocky
Canada305 Posts
and has a really weird deep obsession with posting on teamliquid forums notice how all his replies to everything are 10 pages long.. i mean where does he get all the time for this, its like he's writing a book... maybe because its so full of shit that's why he can write so much.. anyways, hate the guy, glad you got rid of him | ||
x2fst
1272 Posts
Ill still miss him though, the drama he creates is great entertainment. Fakesteve 2 week ban is good, he posts too much crap, he was getting a little out of control and thats a warning to him. But he didnt need to be permabanned like mitsy did. If he doesnt come back this forum wont suffer much though, his contributions are not as great as some of you think. Whoever those people were who said that fakesteve doesnt care about teamlqiuid.... LOL, no one who posts that much doesnt care. | ||
tiffany
3664 Posts
i mod gotfrag forums and trust me, this forum is up on mount sinai compared to that. TLnet is one of the best sites and forums i have ever been a part of, and that is something that i have realized with time, as well as with poor experiences with other forums. here is my suggestion though: yes you do have the ten commandments, and yes common sense really should play a large role in whether a user should come or go. however i think not only should the regular contributors be let a little leeway, but as well as the newer members that have not yet caught on to the TLnet status quo. yeah, lots of mistakes are made by probes, drones, and scvs, but perma-banning may be a little harsh. a week ban at most for the first strike - give them a chance to reflect and mature so that they can possibly become contributors after the abeyance. nonetheless, this community is still very close, the mods deserve all the respect, and rules are rules. rarely have i seen a mod make a ban mistake, so i do not think there needs to be much change as it is. | ||
DV8
United States1623 Posts
| ||
Manifesto7
Osaka26979 Posts
On February 17 2006 00:40 Chibi[OWNS] wrote: funny how you make a topic then ban the main person who would have contributed to it Actually, he was banned and then I made the topic. Not the other way around. But tell me what you feel Chibi. | ||
Mynock
4492 Posts
On February 17 2006 02:21 tiffany wrote:yeah, lots of mistakes are made by probes, drones, and scvs, but perma-banning may be a little harsh. a week ban at most for the first strike - give them a chance to reflect and mature so that they can possibly become contributors after the abeyance. I agree with that: I think not banning people permanently, and instead giving them a sort of "warning" by issuing a 1 week ban then a 2 or 3 week one for the next time before a permanent one is dealt would be a step towards both sides of the argument. Those who think more bans should be executed would get it their way since then more people could be put on ice for a shorter while without any serious consequences, and people like Drone would also have their "consistency", since then a pretty strict and straighforward attitude from the mods would be easy to uphold. -Mynock | ||
Chibi[OWNS]
United Kingdom10597 Posts
| ||
alphaentity
United States525 Posts
I read the forums regularly, but I don't post that much. Although I felt he was wrong or I disagreed with him sometimes, this mitsy guy inspired alot of interesting discussion. I believe bans should be limited to ppl who spam or post illegal things. If a guy is a dick, the community will ignore him, theres no point in silencing his opinions. | ||
RiSE
United States3182 Posts
but nobody does it better than Steve | ||
Liquid`Drone
Norway28273 Posts
I've never objected less to a tempban | ||
to miss the mark
Bosnia-Herzegovina1381 Posts
On February 17 2006 03:19 RiSE wrote: I personally believe this site is better off without Steve. Hell, even HE believes it'd be better off without him. He openly admits his sole purpose at this site is to troll, spam and make 1 liners. but nobody does it better than Steve Casper put up a good fight. | ||
| ||
Next event in 1h 54m
[ Submit Event ] |
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 Counter-Strike Heroes of the Storm Other Games Organizations StarCraft 2 Other Games StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War
StarCraft 2 • davetesta80 StarCraft: Brood War• musti20045 35 • practicex 25 • intothetv • Kozan • Poblha • Migwel • Laughngamez YouTube • AfreecaTV YouTube • aXEnki • LaughNgamez Trovo • IndyKCrew • Gussbus Dota 2 League of Legends Other Games |
OSC
StarsWar
Maru vs Spirit
ShoWTimE vs GuMiho
Firefly vs herO
Oliveira vs SKillous
Chat StarLeague
H.4.0.S
Chat StarLeague
Afreeca Global
Cure vs Stats
Creator vs Solar
StarsWar
Chat StarLeague
BSL
Dewalt vs Zhanhun
ForJumy Cup
[ Show More ] Chat StarLeague
H.4.0.S
GSL Code S
Cure vs Rogue
Stats vs Dark
|
|