|
Glad to hear that there will be 2v2 ladder and possibly more. It does suck that there's issues, but to be honest I've had so much fun playing this game again as well as having a lot of friends back that I haven't cared too much about it.
|
there needs to be a 2v2 channel just like iccup where all the peruvians can shit talk then dodge games
|
I feel conflicted. No ETA, not sure how long these things will take.
|
On August 17 2017 05:59 CobaltBlu wrote:This is Blizz update on the situation with the ladder. https://us.battle.net/forums/en/starcraft/topic/20758537891Show nested quote +Greetings Executors, Cerebrates, and Commanders,
Thanks to everyone playing the new matchmaker; there are definite problems, but we have priority fixes incoming. Thank you also for the input to help source the bugs and your patience while we get things sorted.
We want to shed some light on the situation and talk about next steps:
Known Issues The system designed to verify game results is disposing of matches it should not Leaderboards do not match Season stats (caused by above) Navigating away from the Chat Channel disconnects queued players from matchmaking Matches are sometimes made against ghost players (because they navigated away from Chat) Sometimes Leaderboards slightly exaggerate a player's points (who isn't happy about having their rating pumped up by order of magnitude of a thousand?)
Things In Motion We're honing in on the cause of match results not being applied - this will be a server fix that we will announce, but won't require a client update A server deploy will also fix the exaggerated score issue We have a client fix in test for disconnects from matchmaking We will be resetting the Season when these issues are resolved
Hot Topics Will there be 2v2 or larger matchmaking? Yes. Timeline is dependent on getting current implementation of 1s stable and confidence in the rating system
Turn rate? We are evaluating changing the turn rate, but do not have an official stance yet. Long term we would like to create a system that can adjust turn rate based on latency between players. Emphasis on long term.
Cheers, Classic Games Quote
I wonder when this fix will happen. Note the part about resetting the season when it does happen.
So maybe there's not much point to be playing a lot right now
|
We've waited over 10 years for something like this lol, a little bit more time to make the system and game in a stable condition won't hurt any of us, sure it sucks but meh...it is better than we no Remastered. =p
|
there's plenty of point in playing now if you haven't played bw in months... or years... gotta be fresh for that reset :|
|
On August 17 2017 07:04 GGzerG wrote: We've waited over 10 years for something like this lol, a little bit more time to make the system and game in a stable condition won't hurt any of us, sure it sucks but meh...it is better than we no Remastered. =p It is the same as any release day WoW expansion or any new game from Blizz.
Anyone who didnt expect this doesnt play many Blizzard games
|
nice to see Blizzard on top of it fairly quickly. Blizzard has had issues with the release of some much bigger titles so i'm not exactly shocked this has happened. Furthermore , giving some context ... its a $15 downloadable game localized in ~13 languages offering miniscule profits to Blizz.
the nice thing is .. with 3rd party ladders out there Blizzard has competition and this forces them to raise their game.
|
On August 17 2017 07:15 JimmyJRaynor wrote: nice to see Blizzard on top of it fairly quickly. Blizzard has had issues with the release of some much bigger titles so i'm not exactly shocked this has happened. Furthermore , giving some context ... its a $15 downloadable game localized in ~13 languages offering miniscule profits to Blizz.
the nice thing is .. with 3rd party ladders out there Blizzard has competition and this forces them to raise their game.
Seems like -- for the time being -- blizzard has completely won. Fish had TWO players on it for a couple hours earlier today, and only 500 on it right now. Whereas the korean server has almost 3k.
Good. Fish were always a bunch of racist and corrupt assholes. B====D ~~~~~
User was warned for this post
|
On August 17 2017 07:34 Dazed. wrote:Show nested quote +On August 17 2017 07:15 JimmyJRaynor wrote: nice to see Blizzard on top of it fairly quickly. Blizzard has had issues with the release of some much bigger titles so i'm not exactly shocked this has happened. Furthermore , giving some context ... its a $15 downloadable game localized in ~13 languages offering miniscule profits to Blizz.
the nice thing is .. with 3rd party ladders out there Blizzard has competition and this forces them to raise their game.
Seems like -- for the time being -- blizzard has completely won. Fish had TWO players on it for a couple hours earlier today, and only 500 on it right now. Whereas the korean server has almost 3k. Good. Fish were always a bunch of racist and corrupt assholes. B====D ~~~~~
fish had 2 players online at 4pm - 4:10pm for a server reset, before that there was nearly 2k playing before 5am korean time
|
On August 17 2017 07:39 castleeMg wrote:Show nested quote +On August 17 2017 07:34 Dazed. wrote:On August 17 2017 07:15 JimmyJRaynor wrote: nice to see Blizzard on top of it fairly quickly. Blizzard has had issues with the release of some much bigger titles so i'm not exactly shocked this has happened. Furthermore , giving some context ... its a $15 downloadable game localized in ~13 languages offering miniscule profits to Blizz.
the nice thing is .. with 3rd party ladders out there Blizzard has competition and this forces them to raise their game.
Seems like -- for the time being -- blizzard has completely won. Fish had TWO players on it for a couple hours earlier today, and only 500 on it right now. Whereas the korean server has almost 3k. Good. Fish were always a bunch of racist and corrupt assholes. B====D ~~~~~ fish had 2 players online at 4pm - 4:10pm for a server reset, before that there was nearly 2k playing before 5am korean time Something like 13k on the korean server last night before i slept. Assuming things keep as they are, fish is dead.
|
Can someone define the term "turn rate" for me in this context? It's a way of measuring input delay or what?
|
United States12181 Posts
On August 17 2017 08:20 Jonoman92 wrote: Can someone define the term "turn rate" for me in this context? It's a way of measuring input delay or what?
I believe "turn rate" refers to number of updates per second from each client.
The more frequent the updates, the more granular the level of control, and the more responsive the game feels.
|
Not really fond on the fact that turn rate is a long term goal. I don't think they understand how important this is to Koreans. I'm just glad that I can get quick games against equally skilled opponents, which was a rarity on iccup. I do like the fact that their goal is to do a dynamic turn rate, that's the perfect solution imo.
|
Yeah I was happy to see that is a goal, even if it's not immediate. I have been playing with 8 turn rate and don't have a problem with it (obviously I prefer 12). I do think that they should add a 10 turn rate and put that as ladder default. I think 12 might have too much lag from certain regions.
|
On August 17 2017 03:19 Endymion wrote:Show nested quote +On August 17 2017 01:43 Foxxan wrote:On August 16 2017 23:08 Foxxan wrote: Thats an issue. But another issue is the lag, i feel there is a small lag like every game... I thought this network was supposed to be smooth as fuck with lan latency....
Also what is 8turn rate? They added a delay in starcraft remastered??? Why did they do that then? To disguise the bat network?
Ok i think i know what it is. Yeah thats complete shit. I thought network was gonna be micro-smooth. Someone just told me after he lost his mutas in pvz "why cant i micro my mutas, isnt this suppose to be starcraft remastered", i get it now. I thought it was normal lag but it must be the huge delay instead.. Holy fuck. Cant believe blizz do this. turn rate 8 is equal to playing without AH on iccup, while TR 12 is what #w is on fish's 1.16.1 server... tr 16 is meant to be even CLOSER to true lan lat, but you need to be very close in proximity for it to not lag. my go to for fish is TR 12 games, then setting lat to high. seems to work well. Okay. I see. All i know is it feels like lag, and is a big issue if you ask me. Cant say what iccup felt like though since when i played there i always had a huge delay no matter what.
|
People like to bellyache but it really does sound like Blizzard is doing what they can. I'm sure the team is crazy small.
|
On August 17 2017 10:38 blade55555 wrote: Yeah I was happy to see that is a goal, even if it's not immediate. I have been playing with 8 turn rate and don't have a problem with it (obviously I prefer 12). I do think that they should add a 10 turn rate and put that as ladder default. I think 12 might have too much lag from certain regions. you can still set it to Extra High Latency while in the game
but you can't set it to Extra Low - so 8 being the default is bad
|
On August 17 2017 15:02 iopq wrote:Show nested quote +On August 17 2017 10:38 blade55555 wrote: Yeah I was happy to see that is a goal, even if it's not immediate. I have been playing with 8 turn rate and don't have a problem with it (obviously I prefer 12). I do think that they should add a 10 turn rate and put that as ladder default. I think 12 might have too much lag from certain regions. you can still set it to Extra High Latency while in the game but you can't set it to Extra Low - so 8 being the default is bad
I'm pretty sure turn rate setting is different from low high extra high latency. Afaik the game combines both settings for the final network setting. Turn rate used to be fixed for single player, lan and online play so people created plugins to allow players to change it. So putting it on extra high latency in matchmaking will still keep the turn rate at 8. Meaning that if say 16 was the default, putting the ingame slider to extra high latency wouldn't really help as much with the lag anymore.
|
this shit is ridiculous, im actually starting to get mad.
I literally never find games, i wait FOREVER.
I can't alt tab because the game doesn't even notify you if you found a game if you are alt tabbed.
I'd like to play fish or w/e but I can't because every single game is solid red bars.
what a waste of my time this is
|
|
|
|