Spurs 13 shots 4 on target
Dortmund 9 shots 2 on target
Clinical Spurs won
Forum Index > Sports |
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51338 Posts
Spurs 13 shots 4 on target Dortmund 9 shots 2 on target Clinical Spurs won | ||
Ysellian
Netherlands9029 Posts
On September 13 2017 07:00 nayumi wrote: Show nested quote + On September 13 2017 02:17 Ysellian wrote: On September 12 2017 21:59 Pandemona wrote: Juventus logo looks like it was made by the same guy who thought Real Madrid shirts looked good with Comic Sans font for letters and numbers... T_T Look at all the logo's and Juve's logo stand's out. I hate it, but it makes a lot of sense commercial wise. I don't think United or Real doing well commercially is due to their logos being better than other clubs mate ... So? Not quite sure what you are on about. Juventus are doing something distinctly different from every other club, how is there not a commercial opportunity here for them? Here an article about it: http://www.underconsideration.com/brandnew/archives/new_logo_and_identity_for_juventus_by_interbrand.php | ||
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51338 Posts
| ||
sharkie
Austria18008 Posts
On September 14 2017 18:31 Pandemona wrote: Because at best it becomes 2-2 for Dortmund, they still would have lost at the chances taken by Spurs! Taking chances > missing. Spurs 13 shots 4 on target Dortmund 9 shots 2 on target Clinical Spurs won Its easy to dominate a game when you are ahead 3-1... Spurs only played good the last 30min... You should watch games instead of using stats blindly | ||
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51338 Posts
Dortmund were good first half, still were behind though? Second half were still in control of the ball but without hurting Lloris. Spurs were the opposite, exploiting the defense and poor keeping. This is how it works at the elite level, you can have the ball, but if you do nothing with it you are going to have a bad time! Yes 1 goal wrongly ruled out and should been 2-2 at the break, but the other was a correct decision. This is the champions league, if you can't take your chances or make your 60%(!) possession count you are going to have a bad time. | ||
sharkie
Austria18008 Posts
| ||
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51338 Posts
| ||
sharkie
Austria18008 Posts
Please don't discuss a game you didn't watch at all... Highlights on sky sports != full game | ||
Liquid`Drone
Norway28267 Posts
| ||
city42
1656 Posts
On September 14 2017 18:00 sharkie wrote: Show nested quote + On September 14 2017 17:55 Pandemona wrote: Pretty sure both teams were bad. Spurs for playing a bit niavly at the start of the game, but bought it back being very clinical and deserving the victory. Dortmund just same old problem right, failure taking chances in big games? Now getting out of this group is very hard for Dortmund, they have to better every result of Spurs from now or beat Spurs at home with more than plus 2 goals or they are finishing 3rd in that group! Dortmund took their chances and scored goals. The ref just decided not to allow them. How does that make Spurs deserve their victory? What do you mean by "them?" There was one wrongly disallowed goal. The first one was the correct decision as Aubameyang tried to play the ball and he was well offside. Obviously the second should have counted, but how many other chances did Dortmund create in the second half? Aside from the goal and the wrongly disallowed goal, they had one other shot on target in 90 minutes. You're making it sound like Barca vs. Chelsea 2012, when in reality it was a pretty even match. | ||
Dingodile
4123 Posts
| ||
city42
1656 Posts
On September 14 2017 22:53 Dingodile wrote: Tottenham's 3rd goal happened immediately after the wrongfully disallowed goal. Again, how many other chances did Dortmund create in the second half? From this thread you'd think 4-1 Dortmund would have been a fair scoreline. | ||
sharkie
Austria18008 Posts
On September 14 2017 22:49 Liquid`Drone wrote: Meh, if you lose 1-3 and one goal was wrongly disallowed then it's kinda meaningless to whine about referee, imo. Of course the game could have ended up playing out differently, but it's not a robbery by the ref or whatever. I honestly got the impression, from a couple posts on the previous page, that the referee got like 3 clinical situations wrong, because that's what in my mind would've justified the complains. Why should it be meaningless? Are you saying that teams play the same way when the scoreline is 2-2 or 2-1? I hardly doubt you want to say that. On September 14 2017 22:59 city42 wrote: Show nested quote + On September 14 2017 22:53 Dingodile wrote: Tottenham's 3rd goal happened immediately after the wrongfully disallowed goal. Again, how many other chances did Dortmund create in the second half? From this thread you'd think 4-1 Dortmund would have been a fair scoreline. Dortmund play differently when the scoreline would be 2-2. After a 3-1 in group stage all you do is to stop conceding more goals. Is this your first football season? | ||
Dante08
Singapore4101 Posts
| ||
city42
1656 Posts
Also, the disallowed goal was in the 56th minute and Kane scored in the 60th minute. | ||
sharkie
Austria18008 Posts
| ||
city42
1656 Posts
| ||
Liquid`Drone
Norway28267 Posts
On September 14 2017 23:00 sharkie wrote: Show nested quote + On September 14 2017 22:49 Liquid`Drone wrote: Meh, if you lose 1-3 and one goal was wrongly disallowed then it's kinda meaningless to whine about referee, imo. Of course the game could have ended up playing out differently, but it's not a robbery by the ref or whatever. I honestly got the impression, from a couple posts on the previous page, that the referee got like 3 clinical situations wrong, because that's what in my mind would've justified the complains. Why should it be meaningless? Are you saying that teams play the same way when the scoreline is 2-2 or 2-1? I hardly doubt you want to say that. I said 'of course the game could have ended up playing out differently'. But you don't know that. I think it's just as likely that Spurs would have scored a 3-2 goal after Dortmund scored a 2-2 goal as that they would not have scored a 3-2 goal. Maybe if Spurs was only up by 1 goal after the 3-2, they'd keep pushing for more goals to secure the win and they'd win 4-2 instead. When people whine the way you have been about the referee, I expect it to have been a) really abysmal refereeing and/or b) directly changing the result. From what I'm reading, this was one mistake (granted, a significant one) and only indirectly changing the result. If the 2-2 goal was disallowed in the 88th minute, fair enough. But here, Dortmund still had 35 minutes left to play. They weren't desperate to go totally gung ho. Third Tottenham goal might very well have happened even if it was 2-2 instead of 2-1. And if Spurs was so bad, surely Dortmund should have created far more dangerous chances. | ||
evilfatsh1t
Australia8526 Posts
| ||
Liquid`Drone
Norway28267 Posts
| ||
| ||
Next event in 1h 30m
[ Submit Event ] |
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Britney 55852 Dota 2Calm 8201 Bisu 3050 Mini 868 ZerO 758 EffOrt 704 Hyuk 576 BeSt 493 ggaemo 414 Light 347 [ Show more ] Counter-Strike Other Games singsing2393 B2W.Neo1058 Liquid`RaSZi1000 Beastyqt938 XaKoH 267 ArmadaUGS187 ToD170 Liquid`VortiX119 NuckleDu79 KnowMe2 Organizations |
ESL Open Cup
ESL Open Cup
WardiTV Korean Royale
Kung Fu Cup
H.4.0.S
GSL Code S
herO vs Reynor
soO vs GuMiho
World Team League
Korean StarCraft League
Replay Cast
World Team League
[ Show More ] Chat StarLeague
H.4.0.S
BSL
Chat StarLeague
Sparkling Tuna Cup
World Team League
BSL
ForJumy Cup
|
|