Hey, look what he said!
Edit: TotalBiscuit that is, hehe.
Forum Index > SC2 General |
Nostradameus
Sweden9 Posts
Hey, look what he said! Edit: TotalBiscuit that is, hehe. | ||
dogmeatstew
Canada574 Posts
This page says its a disambiguation of cheese so it'll probably help. | ||
TimeSpiral
United States1010 Posts
Cheese is essentially anything that is not considered "orthodox play." By virtue of not being orthodox it usually enjoys/relies the tactical benefit of surprise. Most of the time when a one refers to a play as "cheese" or "all-in," they are simply saying, "my goodness that play is obnoxious to the point of being infuriating." imo, there is no point in defining it. It is one of those terms you should probably just avoid, much like the term all-in. Using, obsessing, or attempting to define either term is not going to help you win games. | ||
Slago
Canada726 Posts
| ||
Dragar
United Kingdom971 Posts
| ||
Baarn
United States2702 Posts
| ||
Anomandaris
Afghanistan440 Posts
| ||
ThE_OsToJiY
Canada1167 Posts
| ||
Styxyts
Netherlands16 Posts
| ||
Waxangel
United States32556 Posts
| ||
turdburgler
England6749 Posts
atleast thats what most people on forums seem to claim pointless overused meaningless term is pointless overused and meaningless | ||
CScythe
Canada810 Posts
| ||
Leeoku
1617 Posts
| ||
abominare
United States1216 Posts
| ||
Randomaccount#77123
United States5003 Posts
| ||
HiredGoonThug
United States72 Posts
6pool, hope I don't get scouted first. 14 nexus, hope he isn't roach rushing/2raxing Proxy anything, hope he didn't make antiair/detection/scout it/went early pool or gate or rax. For builds like 3gate sentry expand its more like, if I control properly and fend him off I'm way ahead, but if we trade armies then we're about even | ||
Dagon
Romania264 Posts
On April 16 2011 02:04 DukeEsquire wrote: Cheese is just an insult losers use to justify losing a game to something they didn't expect. Pretty much this! I come from a GO background and there îs "cheese" in GO aswell.. It has the name "hamete" or "trick-play" and îs defined by a move that has many good-looking answers, but all of them lead to disasturous (sp?) possitions.. This kind of "style" îs frowned upon amongst most amateurs, however, professionals use it all the time, and they never complain.. They just study harder in order to defeat it.. So, I would define cheese in Sc as "a strategy prepared ahead of time that tries to trick the opponent into making a mistake (be that poor scouting patterns in the form of proxy, inticing the opponent into a bad play, such as nexus cancel into 4gate, etc.)". Just my 2cents.. | ||
Nightmarjoo
United States3359 Posts
So, an all-in could be cheese in the sense that you're gambling on your attack to win. But if you know 100% your all-in can't possibly fail, then it wouldn't be cheese. So yeah I'd consider lifting to gold a form of cheese. | ||
jinorazi
Korea (South)4948 Posts
lets look at the prime example of a cheese rush that came about, boxer's is earliest that i can remember. i remember the commentators going crazy yelling "cheeju lushi!" as boxer pulls all his scvs and rushes with 2 marines with more marines rallied. as mentioned, its high risk(early scout) (DEPENDING ON SITUATION!!!! 2 marine scv rush is 100% safe against aggressive hatch builds, this applies to any early rush like 10gate, 6pool, etc.) so it isn't risky in certain situations. BUNKER RUSH IS NOT CHEESE. its only a form of early harass, that can end games if not dealt with properly. Fast expand is not cheese. it is simply, fast expand, the pros and cons should be obvious. just because it isn't standard, does not mean it needs to be labeled as something else. call it unorthodox but its never "standard or cheese". cheese should be used to define something that is very early game, like 2 marine +scv, 6 pool, cannon rush. if prepared, should be easy to hold off. many good players can transition out of a cheese rush as long as they've done sufficient damage to each other. to add, "all-in" should be defined close to its usage in poker. you know you're obviously losing, therefore "all-in", give everything you got in hopes to come up on top. for example, 2port banshee is not an all-in, however, if that fails and you're far behind, you decide to pump out extra marines/banshee instead of building CC to expand, bring all your scvs to attack/repair and hope to win. - this is all in. there is no "all-in" build, "all-in" is situational. i guess there could be a "all-in" build if you're already set on leaving the game if the planned strat doesn't work as you planned. | ||
humanimal
United States151 Posts
| ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Calm 2604 Dota 2Mini 336 Hyuk 247 firebathero 220 ZZZero.O 216 Bonyth 77 Mind 38 Rock 24 Terrorterran 14 ajuk12(nOOB) 11 Counter-Strike Other Games tarik_tv3692 Grubby2303 Liquid`RaSZi1811 summit1g765 Mlord387 Hui .232 NuckleDu137 ToD130 nookyyy 112 Mew2King89 KnowMe81 Trikslyr81 Organizations Other Games StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War
StarCraft 2 • printf 90 StarCraft: Brood War• StrangeGG 61 • Legendk 15 • CSOeSports9 • Dystopia_ 1 • IndyKCrew • Poblha • Migwel • Laughngamez YouTube • LaughNgamez Trovo • Kozan • Gussbus • intothetv • aXEnki • AfreecaTV YouTube Dota 2 League of Legends Other Games |
Chat StarLeague
Afreeca Global
Cure vs Stats
Creator vs Solar
StarsWar
Chat StarLeague
BSL
Dewalt vs Zhanhun
ForJumy Cup
Chat StarLeague
Kung Fu Cup
H.4.0.S
GSL Code S
Cure vs Rogue
Stats vs Dark
[ Show More ] World Team League
Korean StarCraft League
Online Event
World Team League
|
|