The fact the no Blue poster have explicitly denied the changes also lends viability to the changes not completely being fake.
Epic Troll Thread: New Patch Notes (patch 1.1) - Page 5
Forum Index > Closed |
Alphaes
United States651 Posts
The fact the no Blue poster have explicitly denied the changes also lends viability to the changes not completely being fake. | ||
splcer
United States166 Posts
| ||
ROOTFayth
Canada3351 Posts
On August 15 2010 14:34 travis wrote: removing ultra "head attack" they mean the cleave? won't that make ultra suck balls vs terran ? won't this just make it harder to win zvt lol naw it's the attack when they attack buildings, they do huge damage to buildings | ||
Ndugu
United States1078 Posts
On August 15 2010 14:34 travis wrote: removing ultra "head attack" they mean the cleave? won't that make ultra suck balls vs terran ? won't this just make it harder to win zvt lol I checked the scii wiki and apparantly head attack was the name for when ultras did 70 to buildings with no AOE. They did it twice as slow as their normal attack and with no AoE... so it was actually just completely worse than their normal attack ever since they made ultras anti-armor. Seems like no one ever noticed lmao since it was originally intended to make them good versus buildings. | ||
OhJesusWOW
United Kingdom127 Posts
On August 15 2010 14:29 TitleRug wrote: In terms of this "patch", your user name is exactly how I feel. Most of it seems viable actually, except for the nest. Haha. My username is actually my verbal reaction to something really fucked up a friend of mine said. | ||
ShaperofDreams
Canada2492 Posts
| ||
Deleted User 3420
24492 Posts
then this patch actually doesnt sound too bad i don't like that greater spire build time reduction tho~ but what do i know | ||
iEchoic
United States1776 Posts
| ||
ROOTFayth
Canada3351 Posts
On August 15 2010 14:37 iEchoic wrote: I'm a T player and I would love this patch. Raven HSM buff would be excellent, although it would kind of need a speed boost as well to be effective. I'd reduce it to 100 energy lol | ||
Defeat
United States476 Posts
| ||
Medzo
United States627 Posts
On August 15 2010 14:34 travis wrote: and plz god don't make brood lords easier to get there is no good late game protoss counter for brood lord / corruptor Try some void rays! (corrupter is armored) | ||
InToTheWannaB
United States4770 Posts
| ||
Ndugu
United States1078 Posts
Yup. Void Rays have the added benefit of being great against ultralisks (and corrupters!). As soon as I scout a Hive I pump vrays lately Blink Stalkers + Zeratul do pretty well too :D | ||
heishe
Germany2284 Posts
i mean... seriously? 30dmg voidrays to buildings... loooooool | ||
ooni
Australia1498 Posts
On August 15 2010 14:34 travis wrote: removing ultra "head attack" they mean the cleave? won't that make ultra suck balls vs terran ? won't this just make it harder to win zvt lol and plz god don't make brood lords easier to get there is no good late game protoss counter for brood lord / corruptor he means the attack ultralisk does against buildings. It means ultra will cleave when attacking buildings also. Oh fantasy SC2~ | ||
HubertFelix
France631 Posts
I like a lot the solutions to warp in, void ray, marauders damages against building. The +1 regen with burrowed is a clever thing. I really hope it's not true because of the queen change.. | ||
kaji
United States35 Posts
| ||
Twinweapon
United States90 Posts
It is just not something blizzard would do. Also some of these changes are very dramatic and would change the game very very much. | ||
Ndugu
United States1078 Posts
On August 15 2010 14:47 Twinweapon wrote: This would not happened because it is a rare thing for blizzard to remove nearly half the changes they made int he beta after the game was released. It is just not something blizzard would do. Also some of these changes are very dramatic and would change the game very very much. You guys haven't played WoW, have you? XD | ||
Mellotron
United States329 Posts
But, if some of these were in fact true, i think it could be a good thing. To people saying Blizzard would never do this... practically everything new in SC2 are things that if youd never heard it before youd say it was imbalanced or untrue. Imagine somebody saying there would be a Queen or Mothership in SC2 BEFORE it was officially announced by Blizzard. First time i saw the Changeling shit out of an Overseer and bubble across the map in utter ridiculous cartoon fashion i thought it was April 1st for a second. And yet... its all there in the game. All the things that people said were "only stand-ins" and would be fixed, are still there. So while i think these patch notes are fake, saying that "Blizzard would never do this" is a bit nonsensical. | ||
| ||